Explore related knowledge and questions →

Question 15753: A Fixed Prefix Does Not Supply the All-n CDF Limit Obligation

On this page
  1. Original question and givens
  2. Definition and scope
  3. Step-by-step derivation
  4. Reverse checks
  5. Result
  6. This question review and source binding

Return to catalogue page 79

← Question derivation index · Original question batch

R0030-15753 · q-20261014-advance-20261031-r03-convergence-in-distribution-0078

Original question and givens

Use the explicit Bernoulli symbolic family with interior limit p=1/2, 0<p<1, signed c=3/20, positive shift=4, and p_n=p+c/(n+shift) for every n≥1. The whole parameter tail must stay in [0,1]. The Bernoulli CDF is 0 below 0, 1−p on [0,1), and 1 at or above 1. With this interior limit its only jumps are at 0 and 1; the definition requires CDF convergence only at its continuity points. A chosen coupling is not required, and convergence in probability, almost surely or in Lp is not inferred. Keep exact reduced rationals, omitting /1 for integers. Checked prefix_length=3. Give (p,c,shift,prefix_length,sufficient?,finite_prefix_not_convergence_certificate).

  • G001 — Use the explicit Bernoulli symbolic family with interior limit p=1/2, 0<p<1, signed c=3/20, positive shift=4, and p_n=p+c/(n+shift) for every n≥1. The whole parameter tail must stay in [0,1]. The Bernoulli CDF is 0 below 0, 1−p on [0,1), and 1 at or above 1. With this interior limit its only jumps are at 0 and 1; the definition requires CDF convergence only at its continuity points. A chosen coupling is not required, and convergence in probability, almost surely or in Lp is not inferred. Keep exact reduced rationals, omitting /1 for integers. Checked prefix_length=3. Give (p,c,shift,prefix_length,sufficient?,finite_prefix_not_convergence_certificate).

Definition and scope

Use the original question domain, assumptions and cited MKO definitions. This item has second-context mathematical and bilingual review, with the model, answer and every arithmetic step independently recomputed from the original parameters; the source question remains a candidate.

Step-by-step derivation

S001 · calculation

Before

interior Bernoulli limit mass at0 := sub(1, 1/2)

After

interior Bernoulli limit mass at0 = 1/2

Conditions: none

Compute exactly from original roles and established intermediates,retaining indices,signs,denominators and the operation's carrier.

Step identifiers and dependencies

Rule: exact_rational_arithmetic · Uses: G001

S002 · implies

Before

original limit parameter=[1, 2];reduced p=1/2;mass at0=1/2;mass at1=1/2

After

both endpoint masses positive;only limit-CDF jumps at0 and1;registered interior projection

Conditions: none

Honor the source English restriction0<p<1,so both jumps genuinely have positive mass.Although the raw oracle allows endpoint parameters,do not extend this continuity-point protocol to degenerate distributions;their jump sets require separate analysis.

Step identifiers and dependencies

Rule: Bernoulli_interior_English_guard_not_degenerate_jump_set · Uses: G001, S001

S003 · calculation

Before

Bernoulli first legal tail denominator := sum(1, 4)

After

Bernoulli first legal tail denominator = 5

Conditions: none

Compute exactly from original roles and established intermediates,retaining indices,signs,denominators and the operation's carrier.

Step identifiers and dependencies

Rule: exact_rational_arithmetic · Uses: G001, S002

S004 · calculation

Before

Bernoulli first tail signed correction := div(3/20, 5)

After

Bernoulli first tail signed correction = 3/100

Conditions: none

Compute exactly from original roles and established intermediates,retaining indices,signs,denominators and the operation's carrier.

Step identifiers and dependencies

Rule: exact_rational_arithmetic · Uses: G001, S003

S005 · calculation

Before

Bernoulli first legal parameter := sum(1/2, 3/100)

After

Bernoulli first legal parameter = 53/100

Conditions: none

Compute exactly from original roles and established intermediates,retaining indices,signs,denominators and the operation's carrier.

Step identifiers and dependencies

Rule: exact_rational_arithmetic · Uses: G001, S004

S006 · implies

Before

declared all-n family p_n=1/2+(3/20)/(n+4);n>=1;first parameter=53/100;limit=1/2

After

for every n>=1,lambda=(1+4)/(n+4) in(0,1];p_n=(1-lambda)*1/2+lambda*(53/100) in[0,1]

Conditions: none

The signed c may be positive,negative or zero.Every parameter is a convex combination of the first legal parameter and the limit,so their probability bounds cover the whole tail,not merely one displayed n.No chosen coupling is required for this family of distributions.

Step identifiers and dependencies

Rule: Bernoulli_whole_signed_parameter_tail_convex_combination · Uses: G001, S005

S007 · calculation

Before

Bernoulli last inspected prefix denominator := sum(3, 4)

After

Bernoulli last inspected prefix denominator = 7

Conditions: none

Compute exactly from original roles and established intermediates,retaining indices,signs,denominators and the operation's carrier.

Step identifiers and dependencies

Rule: exact_rational_arithmetic · Uses: G001, S006

S008 · calculation

Before

Bernoulli last inspected prefix correction := div(3/20, 7)

After

Bernoulli last inspected prefix correction = 3/140

Conditions: none

Compute exactly from original roles and established intermediates,retaining indices,signs,denominators and the operation's carrier.

Step identifiers and dependencies

Rule: exact_rational_arithmetic · Uses: G001, S007

S009 · calculation

Before

Bernoulli last inspected prefix parameter := sum(1/2, 3/140)

After

Bernoulli last inspected prefix parameter = 73/140

Conditions: none

Compute exactly from original roles and established intermediates,retaining indices,signs,denominators and the operation's carrier.

Step identifiers and dependencies

Rule: exact_rational_arithmetic · Uses: G001, S008

S010 · implies

Before

inspected indices1 through3;first legal parameter=53/100;last inspected parameter=73/140

After

finite-prefix sufficiency=No;finite_prefix_not_convergence_certificate;separate declared whole-tail argument remains available

Conditions: none

A finite prefix does not constrain an unobserved infinite continuation,so this inspection alone cannot prove a CDF limit.This No does not deny convergence of the explicitly declared symbolic family;its whole-tail formula can supply a separate certificate.

Step identifiers and dependencies

Rule: convdist_finite_prefix_not_all_continuity_point_tail · Uses: G001, S009

Reverse checks

  • S010 · premise_and_result_audit — Check against the original data and this step's premises; a one-way implication is not an equivalence.
  • S009 · premise_and_result_audit — Recompute Bernoulli last inspected prefix parameter with exact rational arithmetic, not rounded decimals.
  • S008 · premise_and_result_audit — Recompute Bernoulli last inspected prefix correction with exact rational arithmetic, not rounded decimals.
  • S007 · premise_and_result_audit — Recompute Bernoulli last inspected prefix denominator with exact rational arithmetic, not rounded decimals.
  • S006 · premise_and_result_audit — Check against the original data and this step's premises; a one-way implication is not an equivalence.
  • S005 · premise_and_result_audit — Recompute Bernoulli first legal parameter with exact rational arithmetic, not rounded decimals.
  • S004 · premise_and_result_audit — Recompute Bernoulli first tail signed correction with exact rational arithmetic, not rounded decimals.
  • S003 · premise_and_result_audit — Recompute Bernoulli first legal tail denominator with exact rational arithmetic, not rounded decimals.
  • S002 · premise_and_result_audit — Check against the original data and this step's premises; a one-way implication is not an equivalence.
  • S001 · premise_and_result_audit — Recompute interior Bernoulli limit mass at0 with exact rational arithmetic, not rounded decimals.

Result

(1/2, 3/20, 4, 3, No, finite_prefix_not_convergence_certificate)

The full substitutions and premise checks give the original answer; source identity,format and status are unchanged.

This question review and source binding

Review date: 2026-10-26

Original questions, answers, step expressions, numeric ASTs and historical records are retained. Source candidate labels remain historical and are not overwritten as formal proof.

Source hashes and review receipts
  • input commit: 0f7be61e2c22317a4075561dc822c87d881a50db
  • original question SHA-256: 6c2ae259fefa073146234435a6b82dda91c27b9050451a13ec79f3e563410d9d
  • candidate record SHA-256: 9dbdc0b389637ea22e44a4b78c705df6cc56e19828c8e78d542083ff91914f78
  • semantic review receipt SHA-256: 73bc08066ffb1a81eacb2d4e288d03f522aeefd3949fa0d97da41b484ed737bc
  • question-first witness SHA-256: ac120452a208b257b8270f38351a09dcd832cdbc8d9db6b69933f83e43cc9336
  • Lean: NOT_RUN · human review: NOT_PERFORMED
Same-source full JSON