Use the complete finite topology=[[], [0], [0, 2], [0, 2, 3], [0, 2, 3, 4], [0, 1, 2, 3, 4]] on the same carrier Fin(5)={0,…,4}. Every subset is an increasing duplicate-free carrier list. First check the unique empty/whole opens and all union/intersection closure obligations; finite topology suffices for exhaustive closure checks. Complements refer to this carrier. No metric is silently supplied. Subset=[2, 3], point=1. Give (point,interior,in_interior?,topology_relative_interior).
G001 — Use the complete finite topology=[[], [0], [0, 2], [0, 2, 3], [0, 2, 3, 4], [0, 1, 2, 3, 4]] on the same carrier Fin(5)={0,…,4}. Every subset is an increasing duplicate-free carrier list. First check the unique empty/whole opens and all union/intersection closure obligations; finite topology suffices for exhaustive closure checks. Complements refer to this carrier. No metric is silently supplied. Subset=[2, 3], point=1. Give (point,interior,in_interior?,topology_relative_interior).
Definition and scope
Use the original question domain, assumptions and cited MKO definitions. This item has second-context mathematical and bilingual review, with the model, answer and every arithmetic step independently recomputed from the original parameters; the source question remains a candidate.
unique empty/whole opens=Yes;ordered open pairs checked=36;first union failure=null;first intersection failure=null
Conditions: none
Each subset is increasing and duplicate-free.The topology has unique empty/whole opens and closure under every binary union/intersection.Finitely many distinct opens reduce arbitrary unions to finite ones,handled by binary closure and the empty set.No metric is supplied.Keep original topology order.
S009 · premise_and_result_audit — Check against the original data and this step's premises; a one-way implication is not an equivalence.
S008 · premise_and_result_audit — Check against the original data and this step's premises; a one-way implication is not an equivalence.
S007 · premise_and_result_audit — Check against the original data and this step's premises; a one-way implication is not an equivalence.
S006 · premise_and_result_audit — Check against the original data and this step's premises; a one-way implication is not an equivalence.
S005 · premise_and_result_audit — Check against the original data and this step's premises; a one-way implication is not an equivalence.
S004 · premise_and_result_audit — Check against the original data and this step's premises; a one-way implication is not an equivalence.
S003 · premise_and_result_audit — Check against the original data and this step's premises; a one-way implication is not an equivalence.
S002 · premise_and_result_audit — Check against the original data and this step's premises; a one-way implication is not an equivalence.
S001 · premise_and_result_audit — Check against the original data and this step's premises; a one-way implication is not an equivalence.
Result
(1, [], No, topology_relative_interior)
The full substitutions and premise checks give the original answer; source identity,format and status are unchanged.
This question review and source binding
Review date: 2026-10-26
Original questions, answers, step expressions, numeric ASTs and historical records are retained. Source candidate labels remain historical and are not overwritten as formal proof.