Explore related knowledge and questions →

Question 16354: A Maximal Matching May Still Have Smaller Cardinality than Another Matching

On this page
  1. Original question and givens
  2. Definition and scope
  3. Step-by-step derivation
  4. Reverse checks
  5. Result
  6. This question review and source binding

Return to catalogue page 82

← Question derivation index · Original question batch

R0031-16354 · q-20261014-advance-20261101-r05-graph-matching-0054

Original question and givens

Use the complete finite undirected loop-free simple graph on Fin(6)={0,…,5} with canonical edges=[[0, 1], [0, 2], [0, 3], [2, 3]], endpoints increasing and the edge list lexicographically sorted. The source rejects noncanonical or duplicate edges. Select original edge indexes matching=[0, 3], sorted increasingly with duplicates forbidden. A matching has pairwise disjoint endpoints; the empty matching is allowed. Keep matching validity, maximality, maximum cardinality and perfect coverage distinct. Give (valid_matching?,addable_edge_indexes,maximal?,maximal_not_necessarily_maximum). List unselected original edges with both endpoints unmatched, in original index order.

  • G001 — Use the complete finite undirected loop-free simple graph on Fin(6)={0,…,5} with canonical edges=[[0, 1], [0, 2], [0, 3], [2, 3]], endpoints increasing and the edge list lexicographically sorted. The source rejects noncanonical or duplicate edges. Select original edge indexes matching=[0, 3], sorted increasingly with duplicates forbidden. A matching has pairwise disjoint endpoints; the empty matching is allowed. Keep matching validity, maximality, maximum cardinality and perfect coverage distinct. Give (valid_matching?,addable_edge_indexes,maximal?,maximal_not_necessarily_maximum). List unselected original edges with both endpoints unmatched, in original index order.

Definition and scope

Use the original question domain, assumptions and cited MKO definitions. This item has second-context mathematical and bilingual review, with the model, answer and every arithmetic step independently recomputed from the original parameters; the source question remains a candidate.

Step-by-step derivation

S001 · implies

Before

complete original carrier Fin(6);original edge list=[[0, 1], [0, 2], [0, 3], [2, 3]]

After

input ALREADY has increasing endpoints and lexicographic edge order;loop-free unique edges=Yes;whole carrier=[0, 1, 2, 3, 4, 5]

Conditions: none

This family requires an already canonical input,not silent normalization of unsorted or reversed duplicate edges.Do not reuse the previous round's normalization guard.Edge indices bind to this original graph,and the complete carrier retains isolates.

Step identifiers and dependencies

Rule: matching_original_canonical_graph_not_silent_normalization · Uses: G001

S002 · implies

Before

matching:raw original-edge indices=[0, 3];original canonical edges=[[0, 1], [0, 2], [0, 3], [2, 3]]

After

sorted duplicate-free selected indices=[0, 3];selected edges=[[0, 1], [2, 3]]

Conditions: none

Sort the selected indices but reject duplicates and select only original edges.The empty matching is allowed.Do not invent edges from endpoint sets or confuse edge indices with vertex labels.

Step identifiers and dependencies

Rule: matching_selected_original_edge_indexes_not_new_edges · Uses: G001, S001

S003 · calculation

Before

matching edge0 endpoint0 incidence := sum(0, 1)

After

matching edge0 endpoint0 incidence = 1

Conditions: none

Compute exactly from original field roles and established intermediates,retaining denominators,signs,indices and the complete carrier.

Step identifiers and dependencies

Rule: exact_rational_arithmetic · Uses: G001, S002

S004 · calculation

Before

matching edge0 endpoint1 incidence := sum(0, 1)

After

matching edge0 endpoint1 incidence = 1

Conditions: none

Compute exactly from original field roles and established intermediates,retaining denominators,signs,indices and the complete carrier.

Step identifiers and dependencies

Rule: exact_rational_arithmetic · Uses: G001, S003

S005 · implies

Before

matching:selected original edge index=0;edge=[0, 1]

After

cumulative endpoint counts in first-seen order=[[0, 1], [1, 1]]

Conditions: none

Increment both endpoints of each selected edge.A count above1 is an endpoint conflict.Keep first-seen endpoint order instead of inventing a numerical sort for the conflict output.

Step identifiers and dependencies

Rule: matching_every_selected_edge_endpoint_incidence · Uses: G001, S004

S006 · calculation

Before

matching edge3 endpoint2 incidence := sum(0, 1)

After

matching edge3 endpoint2 incidence = 1

Conditions: none

Compute exactly from original field roles and established intermediates,retaining denominators,signs,indices and the complete carrier.

Step identifiers and dependencies

Rule: exact_rational_arithmetic · Uses: G001, S005

S007 · calculation

Before

matching edge3 endpoint3 incidence := sum(0, 1)

After

matching edge3 endpoint3 incidence = 1

Conditions: none

Compute exactly from original field roles and established intermediates,retaining denominators,signs,indices and the complete carrier.

Step identifiers and dependencies

Rule: exact_rational_arithmetic · Uses: G001, S006

S008 · implies

Before

matching:selected original edge index=3;edge=[2, 3]

After

cumulative endpoint counts in first-seen order=[[0, 1], [1, 1], [2, 1], [3, 1]]

Conditions: none

Increment both endpoints of each selected edge.A count above1 is an endpoint conflict.Keep first-seen endpoint order instead of inventing a numerical sort for the conflict output.

Step identifiers and dependencies

Rule: matching_every_selected_edge_endpoint_incidence · Uses: G001, S007

S009 · implies

Before

matching:final first-seen endpoint counts=[[0, 1], [1, 1], [2, 1], [3, 1]]

After

conflicting vertices first-seen=[];matched vertices sorted=[0, 1, 2, 3];matching valid=Yes

Conditions: none

Pairwise disjoint endpoints define a matching.An invalid selection may still cover many vertices.Coverage does not replace validity or prove maximality,maximum size or perfectness.

Step identifiers and dependencies

Rule: matching_validity_separate_from_coverage_or_optimality · Uses: G001, S008

S010 · implies

Before

original edge index=0;edge=[0, 1];already selected=Yes;endpoints both unmatched=No

After

directly addable original edge=No

Conditions: none

A direct extension must be an unselected original edge with both endpoints unmatched.It cannot replace selected edges.Testing every direct extension addresses maximality,not maximum cardinality.

Step identifiers and dependencies

Rule: matching_every_unselected_edge_direct_extension_test · Uses: G001, S009

S011 · implies

Before

original edge index=1;edge=[0, 2];already selected=No;endpoints both unmatched=No

After

directly addable original edge=No

Conditions: none

A direct extension must be an unselected original edge with both endpoints unmatched.It cannot replace selected edges.Testing every direct extension addresses maximality,not maximum cardinality.

Step identifiers and dependencies

Rule: matching_every_unselected_edge_direct_extension_test · Uses: G001, S010

S012 · implies

Before

original edge index=2;edge=[0, 3];already selected=No;endpoints both unmatched=No

After

directly addable original edge=No

Conditions: none

A direct extension must be an unselected original edge with both endpoints unmatched.It cannot replace selected edges.Testing every direct extension addresses maximality,not maximum cardinality.

Step identifiers and dependencies

Rule: matching_every_unselected_edge_direct_extension_test · Uses: G001, S011

S013 · implies

Before

original edge index=3;edge=[2, 3];already selected=Yes;endpoints both unmatched=No

After

directly addable original edge=No

Conditions: none

A direct extension must be an unselected original edge with both endpoints unmatched.It cannot replace selected edges.Testing every direct extension addresses maximality,not maximum cardinality.

Step identifiers and dependencies

Rule: matching_every_unselected_edge_direct_extension_test · Uses: G001, S012

S014 · implies

Before

matching valid=Yes;all directly addable original indices=[]

After

maximal=Yes;maximal_not_necessarily_maximum

Conditions: none

A valid matching with no direct extension is maximal.Replacing some edges may yield a larger matching,so maximality proves neither maximum size nor perfect coverage.

Step identifiers and dependencies

Rule: matching_maximal_not_maximum_or_perfect · Uses: G001, S013

Reverse checks

  • S014 · premise_and_result_audit — Check against the original data and this step's premises; a one-way implication is not an equivalence.
  • S013 · premise_and_result_audit — Check against the original data and this step's premises; a one-way implication is not an equivalence.
  • S012 · premise_and_result_audit — Check against the original data and this step's premises; a one-way implication is not an equivalence.
  • S011 · premise_and_result_audit — Check against the original data and this step's premises; a one-way implication is not an equivalence.
  • S010 · premise_and_result_audit — Check against the original data and this step's premises; a one-way implication is not an equivalence.
  • S009 · premise_and_result_audit — Check against the original data and this step's premises; a one-way implication is not an equivalence.
  • S008 · premise_and_result_audit — Check against the original data and this step's premises; a one-way implication is not an equivalence.
  • S007 · premise_and_result_audit — Recompute matching edge3 endpoint3 incidence with exact rational arithmetic, not rounded decimals.
  • S006 · premise_and_result_audit — Recompute matching edge3 endpoint2 incidence with exact rational arithmetic, not rounded decimals.
  • S005 · premise_and_result_audit — Check against the original data and this step's premises; a one-way implication is not an equivalence.
  • S004 · premise_and_result_audit — Recompute matching edge0 endpoint1 incidence with exact rational arithmetic, not rounded decimals.
  • S003 · premise_and_result_audit — Recompute matching edge0 endpoint0 incidence with exact rational arithmetic, not rounded decimals.
  • S002 · premise_and_result_audit — Check against the original data and this step's premises; a one-way implication is not an equivalence.
  • S001 · premise_and_result_audit — Check against the original data and this step's premises; a one-way implication is not an equivalence.

Result

(Yes, [], Yes, maximal_not_necessarily_maximum)

The full substitutions and premise checks give the original answer; source identity,format and status are unchanged.

This question review and source binding

Review date: 2026-10-26

Original questions, answers, step expressions, numeric ASTs and historical records are retained. Source candidate labels remain historical and are not overwritten as formal proof.

Source hashes and review receipts
  • input commit: 0f7be61e2c22317a4075561dc822c87d881a50db
  • original question SHA-256: 08dcf612c575d8520d38101d71a82723e5609317a88eb4a8be6ae4ee878acf51
  • candidate record SHA-256: ed679c84b010cb155edafc3d9238469bab7f3ab57b2f09cc47b246e38040148f
  • semantic review receipt SHA-256: 55bb21783e2125ecf1e67e42f83fd25bec0ccd493f911f4bb937a5e9d6f9369a
  • question-first witness SHA-256: 754ddf2a6039c5ef4aae78a538c6e9a1e9a58d4825aee194e869a27b8a4c95bb
  • Lean: NOT_RUN · human review: NOT_PERFORMED
Same-source full JSON