Positive integer n=2. Use the complete representative range 1≤k≤n. Give (n,coprime_residues,representatives_1_through_n), listing every k with gcd(k,n)=1 increasingly.
G001 — Positive integer n=2. Use the complete representative range 1≤k≤n. Give (n,coprime_residues,representatives_1_through_n), listing every k with gcd(k,n)=1 increasingly.
Definition and scope
Use the original question domain, assumptions and cited MKO definitions. This item has second-context mathematical and bilingual review, with the model, answer and every arithmetic step independently recomputed from the original parameters; the source question remains a candidate.
Each row gives a=q*b+r with its remainder bound.The pairs(a,b)and(b,r)have exactly the same common divisors.Repeat until the second entry is0;the last nonzero value is the gcd.This is an exact chain,not a floating-point approximation or an unexplained answer.
Test gcd=1 for every original representative1 through n exactly once.Include only qualifying representatives.For n=1 the representative is1 and gcd(1,1)=1;do not switch to a different0-through-n−1 list.
division rows[a,b,q,r] with a=q*b+r and0<=r<b=[[2, 2, 1, 0]];terminal positive gcd=2
Conditions: none
Each row gives a=q*b+r with its remainder bound.The pairs(a,b)and(b,r)have exactly the same common divisors.Repeat until the second entry is0;the last nonzero value is the gcd.This is an exact chain,not a floating-point approximation or an unexplained answer.
Test gcd=1 for every original representative1 through n exactly once.Include only qualifying representatives.For n=1 the representative is1 and gcd(1,1)=1;do not switch to a different0-through-n−1 list.
S006 · premise_and_result_audit — Check against the original data and this step's premises; a one-way implication is not an equivalence.
S005 · premise_and_result_audit — Recompute selected modulus exact coprime indicator count with exact rational arithmetic, not rounded decimals.
S004 · premise_and_result_audit — Check against the original data and this step's premises; a one-way implication is not an equivalence.
S003 · premise_and_result_audit — Check against the original data and this step's premises; a one-way implication is not an equivalence.
S002 · premise_and_result_audit — Check against the original data and this step's premises; a one-way implication is not an equivalence.
S001 · premise_and_result_audit — Check against the original data and this step's premises; a one-way implication is not an equivalence.
Result
(2, [1], representatives_1_through_n)
The full substitutions and premise checks give the original answer; source identity,format and status are unchanged.
This question review and source binding
Review date: 2026-10-26
Original questions, answers, step expressions, numeric ASTs and historical records are retained. Source candidate labels remain historical and are not overwritten as formal proof.