Explore related knowledge and questions →

Question 16826: Finiteness Supplies the Universal Compactness Certificate

On this page
  1. Original question and givens
  2. Definition and scope
  3. Step-by-step derivation
  4. Reverse checks
  5. Result
  6. This question review and source binding

Return to catalogue page 85

← Question derivation index · Original question batch

R0032-16826 · q-20261014-advance-20261102-r05-compact-topological-space-0001

Original question and givens

Use the complete finite topology=[[], [0], [0, 1], [0, 1, 2], [0, 1, 2, 3], [0, 1, 2, 3, 4]] on the same carrier Fin(5)={0,…,4}. Each subset is an increasing duplicate-free carrier list. Validate the unique empty/whole opens and all finite union/intersection closure obligations first. All complements, closed sets, closures, interiors and boundaries refer to this same carrier/topology; no metric or visual boundary is silently supplied. Give (carrier_size,open_set_count,compact?,every_open_cover_is_a_subfamily_of_a_finite_topology).

  • G001 — Use the complete finite topology=[[], [0], [0, 1], [0, 1, 2], [0, 1, 2, 3], [0, 1, 2, 3, 4]] on the same carrier Fin(5)={0,…,4}. Each subset is an increasing duplicate-free carrier list. Validate the unique empty/whole opens and all finite union/intersection closure obligations first. All complements, closed sets, closures, interiors and boundaries refer to this same carrier/topology; no metric or visual boundary is silently supplied. Give (carrier_size,open_set_count,compact?,every_open_cover_is_a_subfamily_of_a_finite_topology).

Definition and scope

Use the original question domain, assumptions and cited MKO definitions. This item has second-context mathematical and bilingual review, with the model, answer and every arithmetic step independently recomputed from the original parameters; the source question remains a candidate.

Step-by-step derivation

S001 · implies

Before

same complete carrier Fin(5);original ordered complete topology=[[], [0], [0, 1], [0, 1, 2], [0, 1, 2, 3], [0, 1, 2, 3, 4]]

After

unique empty/whole opens=Yes;ordered open pairs checked=36;first union failure=null;first intersection failure=null

Conditions: none

Each subset is increasing and duplicate-free.The topology has unique empty/whole opens and closure under every binary union/intersection.Finitely many distinct opens reduce arbitrary unions to finite ones,handled by binary closure and the empty set.No metric is supplied.Keep original topology order.

Step identifiers and dependencies

Rule: topology_complete_finite_parent_all_pairs · Uses: G001

S002 · implies

Before

complete finite topology contains exactly6 distinct opens on Fin(5)

After

for ANY set-family open cover U,each member lies in this finite topology;U is finite and covers by itself

Conditions: none

Quantify over any open cover,not a test suite.Every member belongs to the supplied finite topology,so the set of distinct members is finite and already constitutes a finite subcover.

Step identifiers and dependencies

Rule: compact_every_open_cover_finite_topology_not_test_suite · Uses: G001, S001

S003 · implies

Before

same finite topology with6 distinct opens;an arbitrary INDEXED cover may repeat opens

After

select one original index per distinct open used;only finitely many choices;the representative family retains the same union

Conditions: none

An indexed cover may repeat opens infinitely,but only finitely many distinct opens occur.One original index per distinct open retains the union and gives a finite subcover.Do not confuse infinitely many indices with infinitely many distinct opens or extend this argument to arbitrary infinite spaces.

Step identifiers and dependencies

Rule: compact_indexed_duplicate_cover_finite_representatives · Uses: G001, S002

Reverse checks

  • S003 · premise_and_result_audit — Check against the original data and this step's premises; a one-way implication is not an equivalence.
  • S002 · premise_and_result_audit — Check against the original data and this step's premises; a one-way implication is not an equivalence.
  • S001 · premise_and_result_audit — Check against the original data and this step's premises; a one-way implication is not an equivalence.

Result

(5, 6, Yes, every_open_cover_is_a_subfamily_of_a_finite_topology)

The full substitutions and premise checks give the original answer; source identity,format and status are unchanged.

This question review and source binding

Review date: 2026-10-26

Original questions, answers, step expressions, numeric ASTs and historical records are retained. Source candidate labels remain historical and are not overwritten as formal proof.

Source hashes and review receipts
  • input commit: 0f7be61e2c22317a4075561dc822c87d881a50db
  • original question SHA-256: 53dbcef575b5395f28087848deb321255e6fbf709b88ab94e84426dda6e6950c
  • candidate record SHA-256: 9d8e7ec8bcbb41ee1816c9cab8fee5cb147177c18dfcb16510482b0dd1ef5607
  • semantic review receipt SHA-256: d64b4e08bda1c25dd393b7c7e4140a8734610a9b84ae47e6f0adcff7f30a0b8e
  • question-first witness SHA-256: 790fd6623c04ba52a6ffb0a95cea52b532a02b23bb9453926d2d9f7a825fdec8
  • Lean: NOT_RUN · human review: NOT_PERFORMED
Same-source full JSON