# Question 21045: A Strict Epsilon Tail Needs the First Passing Index, Including Equality Boundaries

[Return to catalogue page 106](https://ocme.evemisslab.com/en/questions/page/106/)

[← Question derivation index](https://ocme.evemisslab.com/en/questions/) · [Original question batch](https://ocme.evemisslab.com/en/practice/batch-20261014-advance-20261108-r02-monotone-sequence-convergence-theorem-foundations/#q-20261014-advance-20261108-r02-monotone-sequence-convergence-theorem-0070)

This teaching derivation has second-context AI mathematical and bilingual semantic review, limited to the model and assumptions stated in this question. It has no human review or new Lean proof and does not promote the original question or MKO to Canonical truth.

R0041-21045 · q-20261014-advance-20261108-r02-monotone-sequence-convergence-theorem-0070



## Original question and givens

Use the whole real sequence a_n=L+c/(n+shift) for every n≥0, with L=20/21, positive c=20 and positive integer shift=2. The denominator shift is distinct from the theorem's supremum/infimum bound. The entire symbolic family, not a displayed finite prefix, supplies monotonicity and the corresponding bound. Direction=decreasing, positive epsilon=1/29. Give (direction, limit, epsilon, N, value_at_N, strict_tail_certificate, certificate).


- G001 — Use the whole real sequence a_n=L+c/(n+shift) for every n≥0, with L=20/21, positive c=20 and positive integer shift=2. The denominator shift is distinct from the theorem's supremum/infimum bound. The entire symbolic family, not a displayed finite prefix, supplies monotonicity and the corresponding bound. Direction=decreasing, positive epsilon=1/29. Give (direction, limit, epsilon, N, value_at_N, strict_tail_certificate, certificate).





## Definition and scope

Use the original question domain, assumptions and cited MKO definitions. This item has second-context mathematical and bilingual review, with the model, answer and every arithmetic step independently recomputed from the original parameters; the source question remains a candidate.


- [mko-monotone-sequence-convergence-theorem](https://ocme.evemisslab.com/en/mko/mko-monotone-sequence-convergence-theorem/)





## Step-by-step derivation

S001 · impliesBefore

source operation=monoseq-epsilon-witness;original snapshot and mathematics retained

After

explicit ordered source output fields=[direction, limit, epsilon, N, value_at_N, strict_tail_certificate, certificate]

Conditions: none

Retain the historical interface marker while listing ordered output fields without JavaScript.Fields and tags are not extra mathematical evidence;fixed No markers retain their claim scope.

Step identifiers and dependenciesRule: source_ordered_interface_explicit_without_javascript · Uses: G001





S002 · impliesBefore

ORIGINAL direction=decreasing,L=20/21,c=20>0,shift=2>=1;WHOLE a_n=L+(1)c/(n+shift) for ALL n>=0

After

for EVERY n>=0,a_(n+1)-a_n=(-1)*(20)/((n+2)*(n+1+2));positive denominator;all a_n strictly above L=20/21

Conditions: none

Subtract adjacent symbolic terms using a common denominator.Positivity fixes the sign and gives upper bound L in the increasing case or lower bound L in the decreasing case.This holds for all n,allows negative L,and is not a three-term sample proof.

Step identifiers and dependenciesRule: monoseq_whole_symbolic_monotonicity_and_matching_bound · Uses: G001, S001





S003 · impliesBefore

WHOLE decreasing law with ORIGINAL L=20/21,c=20,shift=2

After

for ANY epsilon>0 choose natural N with N+2>20/epsilon;ALL n>=N have |a_n-L|<epsilon;L is infimum but NOT attained because c/(n+shift)>0

Conditions: none

The Archimedean choice controls every later term.Any smaller upper bound or larger lower bound is broken by a term sufficiently close to L,so L is the sup/inf.In the general monotone theorem,sup−epsilon is not an upper bound,which supplies a term;monotonicity then traps the tail.The decreasing proof is dual.

Step identifiers and dependenciesRule: monoseq_sup_inf_limit_proof_and_nonattainment · Uses: G001, S002





S004 · calculationBefore

monoseq c over epsilon := div(20, 1/29)

After

monoseq c over epsilon = 580

Conditions: none

Substitute the original roles and established intermediates exactly,retaining order,signs and quantified conditions.

Step identifiers and dependenciesRule: exact_rational_arithmetic · Uses: G001, S003





S005 · calculationBefore

monoseq index multiple := mul(1, 579)

After

monoseq index multiple = 579

Conditions: none

Substitute the original roles and established intermediates exactly,retaining order,signs and quantified conditions.

Step identifiers and dependenciesRule: exact_rational_arithmetic · Uses: G001, S004





S006 · calculationBefore

monoseq actual source index := sum(0, 579)

After

monoseq actual source index = 579

Conditions: none

Substitute the original roles and established intermediates exactly,retaining order,signs and quantified conditions.

Step identifiers and dependenciesRule: exact_rational_arithmetic · Uses: G001, S005





S007 · calculationBefore

monoseq witness denominator := sum(579, 2)

After

monoseq witness denominator = 581

Conditions: none

Substitute the original roles and established intermediates exactly,retaining order,signs and quantified conditions.

Step identifiers and dependenciesRule: exact_rational_arithmetic · Uses: G001, S006





S008 · calculationBefore

monoseq witness distance := div(20, 581)

After

monoseq witness distance = 20/581

Conditions: none

Substitute the original roles and established intermediates exactly,retaining order,signs and quantified conditions.

Step identifiers and dependenciesRule: exact_rational_arithmetic · Uses: G001, S007





S009 · calculationBefore

monoseq predecessor distance := div(20, 580)

After

monoseq predecessor distance = 1/29

Conditions: none

Substitute the original roles and established intermediates exactly,retaining order,signs and quantified conditions.

Step identifiers and dependenciesRule: exact_rational_arithmetic · Uses: G001, S008





S010 · impliesBefore

monoseq:c=20,shift=2,epsilon=1/29;index(q)=1q+0;c/epsilon=580;floor=580

After

least nonnegative witness=579;actual source index=579;distance=20/581<epsilon;predecessor distance=1/29;no predecessor evaluated when witness0

Conditions: none

Strict distance<epsilon means the denominator exceeds c/epsilon,so its integer threshold is floor(c/epsilon)+1.Round the affine index upward and clamp only the witness to0.Check the predecessor only when positive;equality still fails.

Step identifiers and dependenciesRule: tail_strict_least_index_not_equality_or_negative_predecessor · Uses: G001, S009





S011 · impliesBefore

monoseq:positive c=20,epsilon=1/29,shift=2,stride=1,offset=0;least witness=579

After

for EVERY integer q>=579,denominator=1q+0+2>=witness denominator>0,so 0<distance<=(20/581)<epsilon

Conditions: none

This is an algebraic inequality for every later index,not convergence guessed from one evaluated term.Positive increasing denominators and a fixed positive numerator control the whole tail;the predecessor check proves minimality only.

Step identifiers and dependenciesRule: tail_all_later_quantified_from_positive_denominator_growth · Uses: G001, S010





S012 · calculationBefore

monoseq at witness N denominator := sum(579, 2)

After

monoseq at witness N denominator = 581

Conditions: none

Substitute the original roles and established intermediates exactly,retaining order,signs and quantified conditions.

Step identifiers and dependenciesRule: exact_rational_arithmetic · Uses: G001, S011





S013 · calculationBefore

monoseq at witness N unsigned tail := div(20, 581)

After

monoseq at witness N unsigned tail = 20/581

Conditions: none

Substitute the original roles and established intermediates exactly,retaining order,signs and quantified conditions.

Step identifiers and dependenciesRule: exact_rational_arithmetic · Uses: G001, S012





S014 · calculationBefore

monoseq at witness N signed value := sum(20/21, 20/581)

After

monoseq at witness N signed value = 1720/1743

Conditions: none

Substitute the original roles and established intermediates exactly,retaining order,signs and quantified conditions.

Step identifiers and dependenciesRule: exact_rational_arithmetic · Uses: G001, S013









## Reverse checks


- S014 · premise_and_result_audit — Recompute monoseq at witness N signed value with exact rational arithmetic, not rounded decimals.
- S013 · premise_and_result_audit — Recompute monoseq at witness N unsigned tail with exact rational arithmetic, not rounded decimals.
- S012 · premise_and_result_audit — Recompute monoseq at witness N denominator with exact rational arithmetic, not rounded decimals.
- S011 · premise_and_result_audit — Check against the original data and this step's premises; a one-way implication is not an equivalence.
- S010 · premise_and_result_audit — Check against the original data and this step's premises; a one-way implication is not an equivalence.
- S009 · premise_and_result_audit — Recompute monoseq predecessor distance with exact rational arithmetic, not rounded decimals.
- S008 · premise_and_result_audit — Recompute monoseq witness distance with exact rational arithmetic, not rounded decimals.
- S007 · premise_and_result_audit — Recompute monoseq witness denominator with exact rational arithmetic, not rounded decimals.
- S006 · premise_and_result_audit — Recompute monoseq actual source index with exact rational arithmetic, not rounded decimals.
- S005 · premise_and_result_audit — Recompute monoseq index multiple with exact rational arithmetic, not rounded decimals.
- S004 · premise_and_result_audit — Recompute monoseq c over epsilon with exact rational arithmetic, not rounded decimals.
- S003 · premise_and_result_audit — Check against the original data and this step's premises; a one-way implication is not an equivalence.
- S002 · premise_and_result_audit — Check against the original data and this step's premises; a one-way implication is not an equivalence.
- S001 · premise_and_result_audit — Check against the original data and this step's premises; a one-way implication is not an equivalence.





## Result

(decreasing, 20/21, 1/29, 579, 1720/1743, Yes, forall_n_ge_N_by_monotone_symbolic_tail)

The full substitutions and premise checks give the original answer; source identity,format and status are unchanged.





## This question review and source binding

Review date: 2026-10-26

Original questions, answers, step expressions, numeric ASTs and historical records are retained. Source candidate labels remain historical and are not overwritten as formal proof.

Source hashes and review receipts
- input commit: 0f7be61e2c22317a4075561dc822c87d881a50db
- original question SHA-256: fd95238d02cd71dedf7c493af7fabdf4edc98ecefab6063f30b396202d82ec57
- candidate record SHA-256: 86d8da9857af70af43e4f4595307f2315a1f727ae6728ab5af0529eab5867c76
- semantic review receipt SHA-256: 8f134403487694af4c70d2e00ec84bab542043ef4b3c54517c04f3c409c0262a
- question-first witness SHA-256: ad772845088ed8e99f87f90d4264b05ea97be35775305a02011af5ee35f0f4ce
- Lean: NOT_RUN · human review: NOT_PERFORMED

[Same-source full JSON](https://ocme.evemisslab.com/data/question-derivations/questions/q-20261014-advance-20261108-r02-monotone-sequence-convergence-theorem-0070.json)




