Explore related knowledge and questions →

Question 21069: Missing Premise Certificates Are Not Negated Properties of an Unknown Continuation

On this page
  1. Original question and givens
  2. Definition and scope
  3. Step-by-step derivation
  4. Reverse checks
  5. Result
  6. This question review and source binding

Return to catalogue page 106

← Question derivation index · Original question batch

R0041-21069 · q-20261014-advance-20261108-r02-monotone-sequence-convergence-theorem-0094

Original question and givens

Boundary mode=monotone_unbounded, displayed prefix_length=21. For monotone_unbounded the declared full example is a_n=n; for bounded_nonmonotone it is a_n=(−1)^n, both on n≥0. finite_prefix_only supplies only a length, not a whole sequence. Give (mode, prefix_or_length, monotone_premise_certified, relevant_bound_certified, theorem_applicability_certified, boundary).

  • G001 — Boundary mode=monotone_unbounded, displayed prefix_length=21. For monotone_unbounded the declared full example is a_n=n; for bounded_nonmonotone it is a_n=(−1)^n, both on n≥0. finite_prefix_only supplies only a length, not a whole sequence. Give (mode, prefix_or_length, monotone_premise_certified, relevant_bound_certified, theorem_applicability_certified, boundary).

Definition and scope

Use the original question domain, assumptions and cited MKO definitions. This item has second-context mathematical and bilingual review, with the model, answer and every arithmetic step independently recomputed from the original parameters; the source question remains a candidate.

Step-by-step derivation

S001 · implies

Before

source operation=monoseq-hypothesis-boundary;original snapshot and mathematics retained

After

explicit ordered source output fields=[mode, prefix_or_length, monotone_premise_certified, relevant_bound_certified, theorem_applicability_certified, boundary]

Conditions: none

Retain the historical interface marker while listing ordered output fields without JavaScript.Fields and tags are not extra mathematical evidence;fixed No markers retain their claim scope.

Step identifiers and dependencies

Rule: source_ordered_interface_explicit_without_javascript · Uses: G001

S002 · implies

Before

ORIGINAL mode=monotone_unbounded;displayed prefix length=21;prefix_or_length=[0, 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17, 18, 19, 20]

After

declared WHOLE a_n=n:adjacent difference1>0;for ANY real bound B choose natural n>B,so not bounded above and not a finite-limit sequence

Conditions: none

Distinguish a whole-sequence formula from a finite length.In the first two cases,monotonicity,bounds and divergence follow from the declared infinite law and explicit witnesses,not the displayed prefix.

Step identifiers and dependencies

Rule: monoseq_boundary_whole_law_not_observed_prefix · Uses: G001, S001

S003 · implies

Before

ORIGINAL boundary mode=monotone_unbounded;actual certificate flags=(Yes, No, No)

After

monotone convergence theorem not certified here;convergence in GENERAL does NOT imply monotonicity;unknown continuation not declared divergent

Conditions: none

Monotonicity and the matching bound are sufficient for this theorem,not necessary for every convergent sequence.A finite-prefix No does not make all extensions divergent;the specified alternating example has its own even/odd divergence witness.

Step identifiers and dependencies

Rule: monoseq_hypotheses_sufficient_not_convergence_necessity · Uses: G001, S002

Reverse checks

  • S003 · premise_and_result_audit — Check against the original data and this step's premises; a one-way implication is not an equivalence.
  • S002 · premise_and_result_audit — Check against the original data and this step's premises; a one-way implication is not an equivalence.
  • S001 · premise_and_result_audit — Check against the original data and this step's premises; a one-way implication is not an equivalence.

Result

(monotone_unbounded, [0, 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17, 18, 19, 20], Yes, No, No, monotone_without_bound_not_covered)

The full substitutions and premise checks give the original answer; source identity,format and status are unchanged.

This question review and source binding

Review date: 2026-10-26

Original questions, answers, step expressions, numeric ASTs and historical records are retained. Source candidate labels remain historical and are not overwritten as formal proof.

Source hashes and review receipts
  • input commit: 0f7be61e2c22317a4075561dc822c87d881a50db
  • original question SHA-256: 1fa649cd28bb3360288a5c5598c8f630d4cbe4e4ac4efb68afd5921ed8ff39e7
  • candidate record SHA-256: 62f0b492ac83dd20e3e2975d954e5fbaf77fbfb0c3a6f814eb2dce344a73b0f3
  • semantic review receipt SHA-256: 8f134403487694af4c70d2e00ec84bab542043ef4b3c54517c04f3c409c0262a
  • question-first witness SHA-256: ad772845088ed8e99f87f90d4264b05ea97be35775305a02011af5ee35f0f4ce
  • Lean: NOT_RUN · human review: NOT_PERFORMED
Same-source full JSON