Explore related knowledge and questions →

Question 21399: Separate Zero, Sign Units and the Positive Prime Multiset

On this page
  1. Original question and givens
  2. Definition and scope
  3. Step-by-step derivation
  4. Reverse checks
  5. Result
  6. This question review and source binding

Return to catalogue page 107

← Question derivation index · Original question batch

R0041-21399 · q-20261014-advance-20261108-r06-unique-prime-factorization-0099

Original question and givens

Use original bounded integer n=-534. Give (n, ordinary_positive_form_claim, sign_unit, absolute_prime_multiset, boundary).

  • G001 — Use original bounded integer n=-534. Give (n, ordinary_positive_form_claim, sign_unit, absolute_prime_multiset, boundary).

Definition and scope

Use the original question domain, assumptions and cited MKO definitions. This item has second-context mathematical and bilingual review, with the model, answer and every arithmetic step independently recomputed from the original parameters; the source question remains a candidate.

Step-by-step derivation

S001 · implies

Before

source operation=upf-unit-sign-boundary;original snapshot and mathematics retained

After

explicit ordered source output fields=[n, ordinary_positive_form_claim, sign_unit, absolute_prime_multiset, boundary]

Conditions: none

Retain the historical interface marker while listing ordered output fields without JavaScript.Fields and tags are not extra mathematical evidence;fixed No markers retain their claim scope.

Step identifiers and dependencies

Rule: source_ordered_interface_explicit_without_javascript · Uses: G001

S002 · implies

Before

ORIGINAL positive integer absolute magnitude=534>1

After

initialize remaining=n,prime multiset empty;invariant product(extracted)*remaining=n;every smaller trial divisor has been exhausted

Conditions: none

Divide only by an actual divisor and exhaust smaller candidates,which justifies primality of each extracted divisor without assuming n is prime.

Step identifiers and dependencies

Rule: upf_factorization_remaining_product_invariant · Uses: G001, S001

S003 · calculation

Before

upf extract divisor2 occurrence0 := div(534, 2)

After

upf extract divisor2 occurrence0 = 267

Conditions: none

Substitute the original roles and established intermediates exactly,retaining order,signs and quantified conditions.

Step identifiers and dependencies

Rule: exact_rational_arithmetic · Uses: G001, S002

S004 · implies

Before

next divisor=2;previous remaining=534;all smaller divisors exhausted

After

extracted multiplicity=1;next remaining=267;remaining modulo2=1;extracted multiset=[2]

Conditions: none

Exhaust every multiplicity before advancing.The stopping test concerns the current remainder,and the final prime remainder must not be omitted.

Step identifiers and dependencies

Rule: upf_complete_trial_division_remaining_invariant · Uses: G001, S003

S005 · calculation

Before

upf extract divisor3 occurrence1 := div(267, 3)

After

upf extract divisor3 occurrence1 = 89

Conditions: none

Substitute the original roles and established intermediates exactly,retaining order,signs and quantified conditions.

Step identifiers and dependencies

Rule: exact_rational_arithmetic · Uses: G001, S004

S006 · implies

Before

next divisor=3;previous remaining=267;all smaller divisors exhausted

After

extracted multiplicity=1;next remaining=89;remaining modulo3=2;extracted multiset=[2, 3]

Conditions: none

Exhaust every multiplicity before advancing.The stopping test concerns the current remainder,and the final prime remainder must not be omitted.

Step identifiers and dependencies

Rule: upf_complete_trial_division_remaining_invariant · Uses: G001, S005

S007 · implies

Before

next divisor=4;previous remaining=89;all smaller divisors exhausted

After

extracted multiplicity=0;next remaining=89;remaining modulo4=1;extracted multiset=[2, 3]

Conditions: none

Exhaust every multiplicity before advancing.The stopping test concerns the current remainder,and the final prime remainder must not be omitted.

Step identifiers and dependencies

Rule: upf_complete_trial_division_remaining_invariant · Uses: G001, S006

S008 · implies

Before

next divisor=5;previous remaining=89;all smaller divisors exhausted

After

extracted multiplicity=0;next remaining=89;remaining modulo5=4;extracted multiset=[2, 3]

Conditions: none

Exhaust every multiplicity before advancing.The stopping test concerns the current remainder,and the final prime remainder must not be omitted.

Step identifiers and dependencies

Rule: upf_complete_trial_division_remaining_invariant · Uses: G001, S007

S009 · implies

Before

next divisor=6;previous remaining=89;all smaller divisors exhausted

After

extracted multiplicity=0;next remaining=89;remaining modulo6=5;extracted multiset=[2, 3]

Conditions: none

Exhaust every multiplicity before advancing.The stopping test concerns the current remainder,and the final prime remainder must not be omitted.

Step identifiers and dependencies

Rule: upf_complete_trial_division_remaining_invariant · Uses: G001, S008

S010 · implies

Before

next divisor=7;previous remaining=89;all smaller divisors exhausted

After

extracted multiplicity=0;next remaining=89;remaining modulo7=5;extracted multiset=[2, 3]

Conditions: none

Exhaust every multiplicity before advancing.The stopping test concerns the current remainder,and the final prime remainder must not be omitted.

Step identifiers and dependencies

Rule: upf_complete_trial_division_remaining_invariant · Uses: G001, S009

S011 · implies

Before

next divisor=8;previous remaining=89;all smaller divisors exhausted

After

extracted multiplicity=0;next remaining=89;remaining modulo8=1;extracted multiset=[2, 3]

Conditions: none

Exhaust every multiplicity before advancing.The stopping test concerns the current remainder,and the final prime remainder must not be omitted.

Step identifiers and dependencies

Rule: upf_complete_trial_division_remaining_invariant · Uses: G001, S010

S012 · implies

Before

next divisor=9;previous remaining=89;all smaller divisors exhausted

After

extracted multiplicity=0;next remaining=89;remaining modulo9=8;extracted multiset=[2, 3]

Conditions: none

Exhaust every multiplicity before advancing.The stopping test concerns the current remainder,and the final prime remainder must not be omitted.

Step identifiers and dependencies

Rule: upf_complete_trial_division_remaining_invariant · Uses: G001, S011

S013 · calculation

Before

upf canonical complete product factor0 := mul(1, 2)

After

upf canonical complete product factor0 = 2

Conditions: none

Substitute the original roles and established intermediates exactly,retaining order,signs and quantified conditions.

Step identifiers and dependencies

Rule: exact_rational_arithmetic · Uses: G001, S012

S014 · calculation

Before

upf canonical complete product factor1 := mul(2, 3)

After

upf canonical complete product factor1 = 6

Conditions: none

Substitute the original roles and established intermediates exactly,retaining order,signs and quantified conditions.

Step identifiers and dependencies

Rule: exact_rational_arithmetic · Uses: G001, S013

S015 · calculation

Before

upf canonical complete product factor2 := mul(6, 89)

After

upf canonical complete product factor2 = 534

Conditions: none

Substitute the original roles and established intermediates exactly,retaining order,signs and quantified conditions.

Step identifiers and dependencies

Rule: exact_rational_arithmetic · Uses: G001, S014

S016 · implies

Before

exhausted trial divisors below10;terminal remaining=89;d*d>remaining;ORIGINAL n=534

After

complete increasing prime multiset=[2, 3, 89];full product=534;a composite terminal remainder would have an already tested smaller divisor

Conditions: none

If a terminal remainder greater than1 were composite,its least prime factor would already have been exhausted,a contradiction.The final entry is therefore prime.This certifies this instance;general existence follows by strong induction,recursively splitting a composite into smaller positive factors.

Step identifiers and dependencies

Rule: upf_final_prime_remainder_complete_existence_instance · Uses: G001, S015

S017 · implies

Before

ORIGINAL signed integer=-534;actual sign=-1;positive prime multiset=[2, 3, 89]

After

ordinary_positive_form_claim fixed No;zero has no finite prime product;units use empty product1;nonzero sign is separated from |n| prime factors

Conditions: none

Zero is not a finite prime product;±1 are units with an empty prime multiset.Other nonzero integers separate sign from positive factors.The fixed No is not a positivity test or a denial of factorization for a positive integer.

Step identifiers and dependencies

Rule: upf_zero_units_sign_nonclaim_not_positive_test · Uses: G001, S016

Reverse checks

  • S017 · premise_and_result_audit — Check against the original data and this step's premises; a one-way implication is not an equivalence.
  • S016 · premise_and_result_audit — Check against the original data and this step's premises; a one-way implication is not an equivalence.
  • S015 · premise_and_result_audit — Recompute upf canonical complete product factor2 with exact rational arithmetic, not rounded decimals.
  • S014 · premise_and_result_audit — Recompute upf canonical complete product factor1 with exact rational arithmetic, not rounded decimals.
  • S013 · premise_and_result_audit — Recompute upf canonical complete product factor0 with exact rational arithmetic, not rounded decimals.
  • S012 · premise_and_result_audit — Check against the original data and this step's premises; a one-way implication is not an equivalence.
  • S011 · premise_and_result_audit — Check against the original data and this step's premises; a one-way implication is not an equivalence.
  • S010 · premise_and_result_audit — Check against the original data and this step's premises; a one-way implication is not an equivalence.
  • S009 · premise_and_result_audit — Check against the original data and this step's premises; a one-way implication is not an equivalence.
  • S008 · premise_and_result_audit — Check against the original data and this step's premises; a one-way implication is not an equivalence.
  • S007 · premise_and_result_audit — Check against the original data and this step's premises; a one-way implication is not an equivalence.
  • S006 · premise_and_result_audit — Check against the original data and this step's premises; a one-way implication is not an equivalence.
  • S005 · premise_and_result_audit — Recompute upf extract divisor3 occurrence1 with exact rational arithmetic, not rounded decimals.
  • S004 · premise_and_result_audit — Check against the original data and this step's premises; a one-way implication is not an equivalence.
  • S003 · premise_and_result_audit — Recompute upf extract divisor2 occurrence0 with exact rational arithmetic, not rounded decimals.
  • S002 · premise_and_result_audit — Check against the original data and this step's premises; a one-way implication is not an equivalence.
  • S001 · premise_and_result_audit — Check against the original data and this step's premises; a one-way implication is not an equivalence.

Result

(-534, No, -1, [2, 3, 89], integer_sign_separated_from_positive_prime_multiset)

The full substitutions and premise checks give the original answer; source identity,format and status are unchanged.

This question review and source binding

Review date: 2026-10-26

Original questions, answers, step expressions, numeric ASTs and historical records are retained. Source candidate labels remain historical and are not overwritten as formal proof.

Source hashes and review receipts
  • input commit: 0f7be61e2c22317a4075561dc822c87d881a50db
  • original question SHA-256: c929cdb0c2247b15241b83616fc78e520915349acd662c328f261395a61a2581
  • candidate record SHA-256: 04ff043e4e60ceccac00060f97cd179aa76ea5d662c7805408bfccced625ef62
  • semantic review receipt SHA-256: 8f134403487694af4c70d2e00ec84bab542043ef4b3c54517c04f3c409c0262a
  • question-first witness SHA-256: ad772845088ed8e99f87f90d4264b05ea97be35775305a02011af5ee35f0f4ce
  • Lean: NOT_RUN · human review: NOT_PERFORMED
Same-source full JSON