Explore related knowledge and questions →

Question 23040: Order Zero Is the Original Function; Later Orders Need the Recursive Chain

On this page
  1. Original question and givens
  2. Definition and scope
  3. Step-by-step derivation
  4. Reverse checks
  5. Result
  6. This question review and source binding

Return to catalogue page 116

← Question derivation index · Original question batch

R0045-23040 · q-20261014-advance-20261111-r02-higher-order-derivative-0015

Original question and givens

Use original low-to-high coefficients=[15, 30, 45, 60, 75, 90] for f(t)=sum coefficients[k]*t^k and derivative order=0≥0. f^(0)=f and each further order differentiates the preceding function. The declared degree bound is coefficient-list length minus1; trailing zeros would make it an upper bound rather than a minimal degree. Give (declared_degree_bound, order, nonnegative_order, order_convention, polynomial_chain_certificate).

  • G001 — Use original low-to-high coefficients=[15, 30, 45, 60, 75, 90] for f(t)=sum coefficients[k]*t^k and derivative order=0≥0. f^(0)=f and each further order differentiates the preceding function. The declared degree bound is coefficient-list length minus1; trailing zeros would make it an upper bound rather than a minimal degree. Give (declared_degree_bound, order, nonnegative_order, order_convention, polynomial_chain_certificate).

Definition and scope

Use the original question domain, assumptions and cited MKO definitions. This item has second-context mathematical and bilingual review, with the model, answer and every arithmetic step independently recomputed from the original parameters; the source question remains a candidate.

Step-by-step derivation

S001 · implies

Before

source operation=higher-order-qualification;original snapshot and mathematics retained

After

explicit ordered source output fields=[declared_degree_bound, order, nonnegative_order, order_convention, polynomial_chain_certificate]

Conditions: none

Retain the historical interface marker while listing source fields without JavaScript.Tags and No retain their claim scope;source-protocol ordering is not a mathematical proof.

Step identifiers and dependencies

Rule: source_ordered_interface_explicit_without_javascript · Uses: G001

S002 · implies

Before

ORIGINAL low-to-high coefficients=[15, 30, 45, 60, 75, 90];declared order=0

After

declared degree BOUND=5=ORIGINAL length-1;initialize derivative order0 with the UNTRIMMED original list

Conditions: none

Length minus1 is the declared bound;do not trim trailing zeros.Order0 is the original function.The monomial rule and finite sums justify each polynomial derivative,not an infinite extrapolation for arbitrary functions.

Step identifiers and dependencies

Rule: higher_ORIGINAL_low_to_high_coefficients_degree_BOUND_order0 · Uses: G001, S001

S003 · implies

Before

ORIGINAL coefficients=[15, 30, 45, 60, 75, 90];order=0;declared degree bound=5

After

final derivative coefficients=[15, 30, 45, 60, 75, 90];for each original power k>=order multiplier=k*(k-1)*...*(k-order+1);lower powers vanish

Conditions: none

Repeated differentiation gives the falling factorial in original coefficient order;orders above the declared bound vanish.This gives no analyticity claim for arbitrary differentiable functions and does not turn a trailing-zero bound into the minimal degree.

Step identifiers and dependencies

Rule: higher_falling_factorial_rule_all_orders_polynomial_only · Uses: G001, S002

Reverse checks

  • S003 · premise_and_result_audit — Check against the original data and this step's premises; a one-way implication is not an equivalence.
  • S002 · premise_and_result_audit — Check against the original data and this step's premises; a one-way implication is not an equivalence.
  • S001 · premise_and_result_audit — Check against the original data and this step's premises; a one-way implication is not an equivalence.

Result

(5, 0, Yes, f_zero_equals_f, Yes)

The full substitutions and premise checks give the original answer; source identity,format and status are unchanged.

This question review and source binding

Review date: 2026-10-26

Original questions, answers, step expressions, numeric ASTs and historical records are retained. Source candidate labels remain historical and are not overwritten as formal proof.

Source hashes and review receipts
  • input commit: 0f7be61e2c22317a4075561dc822c87d881a50db
  • original question SHA-256: ebf3a54a2445392747462277ff791bc06ff5cf7a68a90717ba17287cd71feacb
  • candidate record SHA-256: 88b1b68ccf55b78c84a409e54201c9fb2d412529f50392448d988cae3b097297
  • semantic review receipt SHA-256: 357d7ad7a6726b2a757558d3b9586a408ade06526cc023da093719c292704438
  • question-first witness SHA-256: 99cefe17e98c7a74321801cf72df6d02fc95b6a6b78aa335accb7e11ed467b2a
  • Lean: NOT_RUN · human review: NOT_PERFORMED
Same-source full JSON