Explore related knowledge and questions →

Question 22727: Negative Indices Are Outside This Catalan Domain

On this page
  1. Original question and givens
  2. Definition and scope
  3. Step-by-step derivation
  4. Reverse checks
  5. Result
  6. This question review and source binding

Return to catalogue page 114

← Question derivation index · Original question batch

R0044-22727 · q-20261014-advance-20261111-r05-catalan-numbers-0077

Original question and givens

Use negative integer n=-2. Give (n, in_domain, value_or_null, boundary).

  • G001 — Use negative integer n=-2. Give (n, in_domain, value_or_null, boundary).

Definition and scope

Use the original question domain, assumptions and cited MKO definitions. This item has second-context mathematical and bilingual review, with the model, answer and every arithmetic step independently recomputed from the original parameters; the source question remains a candidate.

Step-by-step derivation

S001 · implies

Before

source operation=catalan-negative-index-boundary;original snapshot and mathematics retained

After

explicit ordered source output fields=[n, in_domain, value_or_null, boundary]

Conditions: none

Keep the historical interface marker and list ordered source fields without JavaScript.Tags are not additional evidence;fixed No markers retain their scope.The ordering helper supplies protocol order,not mathematical correctness.

Step identifiers and dependencies

Rule: source_ordered_interface_explicit_without_javascript · Uses: G001

S002 · implies

Before

ORIGINAL negative n=-2

After

in_domain=No;value_or_null=null;this declared sequence startsC0=1,not a negative-index extension

Conditions: none

This sequence starts at natural index0.Negative indices remain null without silently adopting an extension or shifting C0 to C1.

Step identifiers and dependencies

Rule: catalan_negative_outside_zero_based_natural_domain · Uses: G001, S001

Reverse checks

  • S002 · premise_and_result_audit — Check against the original data and this step's premises; a one-way implication is not an equivalence.
  • S001 · premise_and_result_audit — Check against the original data and this step's premises; a one-way implication is not an equivalence.

Result

(-2, No, null, Catalan_domain_is_natural_numbers_including_zero)

The full substitutions and premise checks give the original answer; source identity,format and status are unchanged.

This question review and source binding

Review date: 2026-10-26

Original questions, answers, step expressions, numeric ASTs and historical records are retained. Source candidate labels remain historical and are not overwritten as formal proof.

Source hashes and review receipts
  • input commit: 0f7be61e2c22317a4075561dc822c87d881a50db
  • original question SHA-256: da03eda4af4c71adcf0c4a77671f69f7592f910c77be1667a926f3c248571b05
  • candidate record SHA-256: 6fd1f3dd031ba1ce18843577e54f280c2af5bfc01fd76a4b83860fa1c499cd4b
  • semantic review receipt SHA-256: 89b8e810eced1a69dbfef28d4b112e829edf156c7905a86e39a3f4958cd75e81
  • question-first witness SHA-256: b2e8b769c463242f05172564ae96e310403eae151e1ec30bcb50be3ffe12cfc7
  • Lean: NOT_RUN · human review: NOT_PERFORMED
Same-source full JSON