Explore related knowledge and questions →

Question 23813: The Positive and Negative Endpoints Can Have Different Status under the Same Radius

On this page
  1. Original question and givens
  2. Definition and scope
  3. Step-by-step derivation
  4. Reverse checks
  5. Result
  6. This question review and source binding

Return to catalogue page 120

← Question derivation index · Original question batch

R0046-23813 · q-20261014-advance-20261112-r05-power-series-radius-of-convergence-0063

Original question and givens

Use a_n=3^(−n)/(n+1)^0 for every n≥0 and center=0, with radius R=3>0 and decay_power in {0,1,2}. Give (coefficient_law, center, radius, decay_power, positive_endpoint_status, negative_endpoint_status, separate_endpoint_certificate, boundary).

  • G001 — Use a_n=3^(−n)/(n+1)^0 for every n≥0 and center=0, with radius R=3>0 and decay_power in {0,1,2}. Give (coefficient_law, center, radius, decay_power, positive_endpoint_status, negative_endpoint_status, separate_endpoint_certificate, boundary).

Definition and scope

Use the original question domain, assumptions and cited MKO definitions. This item has second-context mathematical and bilingual review, with the model, answer and every arithmetic step independently recomputed from the original parameters; the source question remains a candidate.

Step-by-step derivation

S001 · implies

Before

source operation=radius-endpoint-independent;original snapshot and mathematics retained

After

explicit ordered source output fields=[coefficient_law, center, radius, decay_power, positive_endpoint_status, negative_endpoint_status, separate_endpoint_certificate, boundary]

Conditions: none

Keep the source snapshot while listing ordered fields without JavaScript.Radius uses its original mode to select6 or11 fields without padding;distinguish nonclaims from actual negations.

Step identifiers and dependencies

Rule: source_ordered_interface_explicit_without_javascript · Uses: G001

S002 · implies

Before

ORIGINAL center=0;R=3>0;power=0;WHOLE a_n=R^(-n)/(n+1)^power for EVERY n>=0

After

coefficient ratio tends1/R,so radius=3;at c+R terms=1/(n+1)^0;at c-R terms=(-1)^n/(n+1)^0

Conditions: none

The whole law gives the ratio limit and radius;substitute at each endpoint separately,not a root-test limit guessed from a prefix.

Step identifiers and dependencies

Rule: radius_ENDPOINT_whole_coefficient_law_same_radius · Uses: G001, S001

S003 · implies

Before

ORIGINAL endpoint power=0;positive endpoint=c+R,negative endpoint=c-R

After

positive_endpoint_status=divergence;negative_endpoint_status=divergence_terms_do_not_tend_to_zero;separate_endpoint_certificate=Yes

Conditions: none

For p0,terms fail to tend to0 at either endpoint.For p1,the positive harmonic series diverges while the alternating series converges conditionally.For p2,both converge absolutely by the p-series test.The radius alone determines none of these endpoint outcomes.

Step identifiers and dependencies

Rule: radius_TWO_endpoints_separate_term_pseries_alternating_tests · Uses: G001, S002

Reverse checks

  • S003 · premise_and_result_audit — Check against the original data and this step's premises; a one-way implication is not an equivalence.
  • S002 · premise_and_result_audit — Check against the original data and this step's premises; a one-way implication is not an equivalence.
  • S001 · premise_and_result_audit — Check against the original data and this step's premises; a one-way implication is not an equivalence.

Result

(a_n=3^(-n)/(n+1)^0_for_every_n>=0, 0, 3, 0, divergence, divergence_terms_do_not_tend_to_zero, Yes, same_radius_does_not_determine_either_endpoint)

The full substitutions and premise checks give the original answer; source identity,format and status are unchanged.

This question review and source binding

Review date: 2026-10-26

Original questions, answers, step expressions, numeric ASTs and historical records are retained. Source candidate labels remain historical and are not overwritten as formal proof.

Source hashes and review receipts
  • input commit: 0f7be61e2c22317a4075561dc822c87d881a50db
  • original question SHA-256: 0001f5acdb52cabb32983874ede0131174a695761c2c357f3a82c9248688c66f
  • candidate record SHA-256: c8610d77a4e4738ff38b985ded2fa71229b2ec0e3e6419fe53ab58a9fb7f4475
  • semantic review receipt SHA-256: a7c0d888ade6d307703c4222c4137c78c0d2448babdcba2fa3446fe6fdd343c1
  • question-first witness SHA-256: c9571f97a37d503ad6a61034cc00108543a05c37ef246d1c4962f55136a3de02
  • Lean: NOT_RUN · human review: NOT_PERFORMED
Same-source full JSON