Explore related knowledge and questions →

Question 23878: Whole Factorial Laws and Complete Shared-Prefix Tails Keep Their Different Radii

On this page
  1. Original question and givens
  2. Definition and scope
  3. Step-by-step derivation
  4. Reverse checks
  5. Result
  6. This question review and source binding

Return to catalogue page 120

← Question derivation index · Original question batch

R0046-23878 · q-20261014-advance-20261112-r05-power-series-radius-of-convergence-0078

Original question and givens

Use mode=finite_prefix, positive scale=3, source prefix_length=1, first_ratio=1/2, second_ratio=1/3. zero_radius/infinite_radius require the canonical unused-field sentinels prefix0 and ratios1. Give (mode, scale, prefix_last_index, common_zero_prefix, first_complete_law, second_complete_law, first_radius, second_radius, same_prefix, different_radii, certificate).

  • G001 — Use mode=finite_prefix, positive scale=3, source prefix_length=1, first_ratio=1/2, second_ratio=1/3. zero_radius/infinite_radius require the canonical unused-field sentinels prefix0 and ratios1. Give (mode, scale, prefix_last_index, common_zero_prefix, first_complete_law, second_complete_law, first_radius, second_radius, same_prefix, different_radii, certificate).

Definition and scope

Use the original question domain, assumptions and cited MKO definitions. This item has second-context mathematical and bilingual review, with the model, answer and every arithmetic step independently recomputed from the original parameters; the source question remains a candidate.

Step-by-step derivation

S001 · implies

Before

source operation=radius-zero-infinity-prefix-boundary;original snapshot and mathematics retained

After

explicit ordered source output fields=[mode, scale, prefix_last_index, common_zero_prefix, first_complete_law, second_complete_law, first_radius, second_radius, same_prefix, different_radii, certificate]

Conditions: none

Keep the source snapshot while listing ordered fields without JavaScript.Radius uses its original mode to select6 or11 fields without padding;distinguish nonclaims from actual negations.

Step identifiers and dependencies

Rule: source_ordered_interface_explicit_without_javascript · Uses: G001

S002 · calculation

Before

Radius ORIGINAL first complete-tail reciprocal := div(1, 1/2)

After

Radius ORIGINAL first complete-tail reciprocal = 2

Conditions: none

Substitute original roles and established intermediates exactly,without floats or treating finite tests as universal limits.

Step identifiers and dependencies

Rule: exact_rational_arithmetic · Uses: G001, S001

S003 · calculation

Before

Radius ORIGINAL second complete-tail reciprocal := div(1, 1/3)

After

Radius ORIGINAL second complete-tail reciprocal = 3

Conditions: none

Substitute original roles and established intermediates exactly,without floats or treating finite tests as universal limits.

Step identifiers and dependencies

Rule: exact_rational_arithmetic · Uses: G001, S002

S004 · implies

Before

ORIGINAL prefix_length parameter N=1;positive scale=3;distinct positive tail ratios=[1/2, 1/3]

After

COMMON zero coefficients at ALL n0..N=[0, 0];there are N+1=2 zeros;for n>N laws are scale*q^(n-N-1),first tail term scale;radii=[2, 3] DIFFER

Conditions: none

The source parameter is the last shared zero index,not list length.The complete tails have ratios q1 and q2;finite changes/shifts do not change radius.The common finite prefix does not determine an infinite tail.

Step identifiers and dependencies

Rule: radius_SHARED_prefix_LAST_index_Nplus1_not_lengthN · Uses: G001, S003

Reverse checks

  • S004 · premise_and_result_audit — Check against the original data and this step's premises; a one-way implication is not an equivalence.
  • S003 · premise_and_result_audit — Recompute Radius ORIGINAL second complete-tail reciprocal with exact rational arithmetic, not rounded decimals.
  • S002 · premise_and_result_audit — Recompute Radius ORIGINAL first complete-tail reciprocal with exact rational arithmetic, not rounded decimals.
  • S001 · premise_and_result_audit — Check against the original data and this step's premises; a one-way implication is not an equivalence.

Result

(finite_prefix, 3, 1, [0, 0], a_n=0_for_n<=1;a_n=3*(1/2)^(n-2)_for_n>1, b_n=0_for_n<=1;b_n=3*(1/3)^(n-2)_for_n>1, 2, 3, Yes, Yes, two_complete_laws_share_every_coefficient_through_the_prefix_and_have_different_radii)

The full substitutions and premise checks give the original answer; source identity,format and status are unchanged.

This question review and source binding

Review date: 2026-10-26

Original questions, answers, step expressions, numeric ASTs and historical records are retained. Source candidate labels remain historical and are not overwritten as formal proof.

Source hashes and review receipts
  • input commit: 0f7be61e2c22317a4075561dc822c87d881a50db
  • original question SHA-256: 7d64652ee8975fac21fd5b83eb64bb17e3b15b87648d0002f87bce71b82c3902
  • candidate record SHA-256: 74269f59ee83c9abe44ddbc3d256fa5bb0ed438038da21f40fdf2bf7143e6eee
  • semantic review receipt SHA-256: a7c0d888ade6d307703c4222c4137c78c0d2448babdcba2fa3446fe6fdd343c1
  • question-first witness SHA-256: c9571f97a37d503ad6a61034cc00108543a05c37ef246d1c4962f55136a3de02
  • Lean: NOT_RUN · human review: NOT_PERFORMED
Same-source full JSON