Explore related knowledge and questions →

Question 24630: Support Coverage Is Separate from Accidental Equality at One Point

On this page
  1. Original question and givens
  2. Definition and scope
  3. Step-by-step derivation
  4. Reverse checks
  5. Result
  6. This question review and source binding

Return to catalogue page 124

← Question derivation index · Original question batch

R0048-24630 · q-20261015-advance-20261113-r03-analytic-ordinary-generating-function-0030

Original question and givens

Use finite_support_coefficients=[5, 10, 15] in increasing index order and the complete law a_n=0 after the list. Canonical answers trim trailing zero coefficients, without changing the original shared parameters. This is a complete finite-support law, not an unknown sequence observed only through a prefix. Use x=1/3, cutoff=2. Give (finite_support_coefficients, x, cutoff, term_rows, finite_sum, complete_support_included, certificate).

  • G001 — Use finite_support_coefficients=[5, 10, 15] in increasing index order and the complete law a_n=0 after the list. Canonical answers trim trailing zero coefficients, without changing the original shared parameters. This is a complete finite-support law, not an unknown sequence observed only through a prefix. Use x=1/3, cutoff=2. Give (finite_support_coefficients, x, cutoff, term_rows, finite_sum, complete_support_included, certificate).

Definition and scope

Use the original question domain, assumptions and cited MKO definitions. This item has second-context mathematical and bilingual review, with the model, answer and every arithmetic step independently recomputed from the original parameters; the source question remains a candidate.

Step-by-step derivation

S001 · implies

Before

source roles = [ogf-finite-partial-sum]

After

derived = [[finite_support_coefficients, x, cutoff, term_rows, finite_sum, complete_support_included, certificate]]

Conditions: none

List the full source field order without JavaScript,keeping original data,Boolean flags,mathematical objects and nonclaims distinct.

Step identifiers and dependencies

Rule: source_ordered_fields_without_JS · Uses: G001

S002 · implies

Before

source roles = [[5, 10, 15]]

After

derived = [[5, 10, 15], a_n=0 for EVERY n beyond this finite list]

Conditions: none

Trim only canonical trailing zeros without changing inputs,retaining at least one coefficient.This defines the entire sequence with its zero tail,not an observed prefix or the EGF coefficient a_n/n!.

Step identifiers and dependencies

Rule: OGF_complete_finite_support_zero_tail_NOT_unknown_prefix · Uses: G001, S001

S003 · implies

Before

(1/3)^0

After

OGF ORIGINAL x power0 = 1

Conditions: none

Evaluate the finite nonnegative-integer power exactly; exponent0 uses the polynomial multiplicative identity.

Step identifiers and dependencies

Rule: integer_power · Uses: G001, S002

S004 · calculation

Before

OGF term0 coefficient times power := mul(5, 1)

After

OGF term0 coefficient times power = 5

Conditions: none

Substitute original roles and established intermediates exactly,checking nonzero denominators without floats.

Step identifiers and dependencies

Rule: exact_rational_arithmetic · Uses: G001, S003

S005 · calculation

Before

OGF partial sum through0 := sum(0, 5)

After

OGF partial sum through0 = 5

Conditions: none

Substitute original roles and established intermediates exactly,checking nonzero denominators without floats.

Step identifiers and dependencies

Rule: exact_rational_arithmetic · Uses: G001, S004

S006 · implies

Before

(1/3)^1

After

OGF ORIGINAL x power1 = 1/3

Conditions: none

Evaluate the finite nonnegative-integer power exactly; exponent0 uses the polynomial multiplicative identity.

Step identifiers and dependencies

Rule: integer_power · Uses: G001, S005

S007 · calculation

Before

OGF term1 coefficient times power := mul(10, 1/3)

After

OGF term1 coefficient times power = 10/3

Conditions: none

Substitute original roles and established intermediates exactly,checking nonzero denominators without floats.

Step identifiers and dependencies

Rule: exact_rational_arithmetic · Uses: G001, S006

S008 · calculation

Before

OGF partial sum through1 := sum(5, 10/3)

After

OGF partial sum through1 = 25/3

Conditions: none

Substitute original roles and established intermediates exactly,checking nonzero denominators without floats.

Step identifiers and dependencies

Rule: exact_rational_arithmetic · Uses: G001, S007

S009 · implies

Before

(1/3)^2

After

OGF ORIGINAL x power2 = 1/9

Conditions: none

Evaluate the finite nonnegative-integer power exactly; exponent0 uses the polynomial multiplicative identity.

Step identifiers and dependencies

Rule: integer_power · Uses: G001, S008

S010 · calculation

Before

OGF term2 coefficient times power := mul(15, 1/9)

After

OGF term2 coefficient times power = 5/3

Conditions: none

Substitute original roles and established intermediates exactly,checking nonzero denominators without floats.

Step identifiers and dependencies

Rule: exact_rational_arithmetic · Uses: G001, S009

S011 · calculation

Before

OGF partial sum through2 := sum(25/3, 5/3)

After

OGF partial sum through2 = 10

Conditions: none

Substitute original roles and established intermediates exactly,checking nonzero denominators without floats.

Step identifiers and dependencies

Rule: exact_rational_arithmetic · Uses: G001, S010

S012 · implies

Before

source roles = [[5, 10, 15], 1/3, 2]

After

derived = [10, Yes]

Conditions: none

The coverage flag compares cutoff with the final nonzero support,not accidental point equality.At x=0 or by cancellation,a shorter sum may have the same value.

Step identifiers and dependencies

Rule: OGF_support_coverage_NOT_accidental_pointwise_equality · Uses: G001, S011

Reverse checks

  • S012 · premise_and_result_audit — Check against the original data and this step's premises; a one-way implication is not an equivalence.
  • S011 · premise_and_result_audit — Recompute OGF partial sum through2 with exact rational arithmetic, not rounded decimals.
  • S010 · premise_and_result_audit — Recompute OGF term2 coefficient times power with exact rational arithmetic, not rounded decimals.
  • S009 · premise_and_result_audit — Check against the original data and this step's premises; a one-way implication is not an equivalence.
  • S008 · premise_and_result_audit — Recompute OGF partial sum through1 with exact rational arithmetic, not rounded decimals.
  • S007 · premise_and_result_audit — Recompute OGF term1 coefficient times power with exact rational arithmetic, not rounded decimals.
  • S006 · premise_and_result_audit — Check against the original data and this step's premises; a one-way implication is not an equivalence.
  • S005 · premise_and_result_audit — Recompute OGF partial sum through0 with exact rational arithmetic, not rounded decimals.
  • S004 · premise_and_result_audit — Recompute OGF term0 coefficient times power with exact rational arithmetic, not rounded decimals.
  • S003 · premise_and_result_audit — Check against the original data and this step's premises; a one-way implication is not an equivalence.
  • S002 · premise_and_result_audit — Check against the original data and this step's premises; a one-way implication is not an equivalence.
  • S001 · premise_and_result_audit — Check against the original data and this step's premises; a one-way implication is not an equivalence.

Result

([5, 10, 15], 1/3, 2, [[0, 5, 5], [1, 10, 10/3], [2, 15, 5/3]], 10, Yes, finite_partial_sum_equals_the_full_OGF_only_after_all_nonzero_finite_support_coefficients_are_included)

The full substitutions and premise checks give the original answer; source identity,format and status are unchanged.

This question review and source binding

Review date: 2026-10-26

Original questions, answers, step expressions, numeric ASTs and historical records are retained. Source candidate labels remain historical and are not overwritten as formal proof.

Source hashes and review receipts
  • input commit: 0f7be61e2c22317a4075561dc822c87d881a50db
  • original question SHA-256: 28bcad1384ecb2140be2664cb81bc1b032e747a910bbd71fbff64ac8933cdc9a
  • candidate record SHA-256: e8a0ce431b2fa4db9b5bffe3ad8ff8120d08d60d7e052a5bd01e07c2a5893954
  • semantic review receipt SHA-256: 049a9e07e69fead88d93b34f0937b9470a06d71c1a8d097058fc83554529bdd0
  • question-first witness SHA-256: 0c71ebb418f3de347d232d159fc25e93036f4ab9166bcfb5ee5b4be86d5c55b9
  • Lean: NOT_RUN · human review: NOT_PERFORMED
Same-source full JSON