Explore related knowledge and questions →
← Question derivation index · Original question batch
R0049-25025 · q-20261015-advance-20261114-r06-linear-program-standard-form-0100
Use mode=greater_equal, coefficients=[25, -26, 1], rhs=27. The fixed target convention is maximize/≤/nonnegative. Give (mode, coefficients, rhs, negated_coefficients, negated_rhs, certificate).
G001 — Use mode=greater_equal, coefficients=[25, -26, 1], rhs=27. The fixed target convention is maximize/≤/nonnegative. Give (mode, coefficients, rhs, negated_coefficients, negated_rhs, certificate).Use the original question domain, assumptions and cited MKO definitions. This item has second-context mathematical and bilingual review, with the model, answer and every arithmetic step independently recomputed from the original parameters; the source question remains a candidate.
Before
source roles = [lp-standard-convention-boundary]
After
derived = [[mode, coefficients, rhs, negated_coefficients, negated_rhs, certificate]]
Conditions: none
List the full source field order without JavaScript.LP boundary modes all have6 fields but select different roles from the original mode,not answer shape.
Rule: source_ordered_fields_without_JS · Uses: G001
Before
LP convention coefficient0 negation := mul(-1, 25)
After
LP convention coefficient0 negation = -25
Conditions: none
Substitute original roles and established intermediates exactly,without rounding or substituting a single observation.
Rule: exact_rational_arithmetic · Uses: G001, S001
Before
LP convention coefficient1 negation := mul(-1, -26)
After
LP convention coefficient1 negation = 26
Conditions: none
Substitute original roles and established intermediates exactly,without rounding or substituting a single observation.
Rule: exact_rational_arithmetic · Uses: G001, S002
Before
LP convention coefficient2 negation := mul(-1, 1)
After
LP convention coefficient2 negation = -1
Conditions: none
Substitute original roles and established intermediates exactly,without rounding or substituting a single observation.
Rule: exact_rational_arithmetic · Uses: G001, S003
Before
LP convention RHS negation := mul(-1, 27)
After
LP convention RHS negation = -27
Conditions: none
Substitute original roles and established intermediates exactly,without rounding or substituting a single observation.
Rule: exact_rational_arithmetic · Uses: G001, S004
Before
source roles = [greater_equal, [25, -26, 1], 27]
After
derived = [greater_equal, [25, -26, 1], 27, [-25, 26, -1], -27, multiply_constraint_by_minus_one_to_obtain_less_equal]
Conditions: none
Multiplying a >=constraint by−1 reverses its sign;equality is two opposite <=constraints;minimizing cTx is maximizing(−c)Tx with negated value.For minimize,rhs0 is only an unused-field sentinel.Conversion preserves pointwise constraints/objectives,not feasibility,boundedness,existence of an optimum or duality;no b>=0 assumption.
Rule: LP_original_mode_roles_and_GENERAL_equivalent_conversion · Uses: G001, S005
S006 · premise_and_result_audit — Check against the original data and this step's premises; a one-way implication is not an equivalence.S005 · premise_and_result_audit — Recompute LP convention RHS negation with exact rational arithmetic, not rounded decimals.S004 · premise_and_result_audit — Recompute LP convention coefficient2 negation with exact rational arithmetic, not rounded decimals.S003 · premise_and_result_audit — Recompute LP convention coefficient1 negation with exact rational arithmetic, not rounded decimals.S002 · premise_and_result_audit — Recompute LP convention coefficient0 negation with exact rational arithmetic, not rounded decimals.S001 · premise_and_result_audit — Check against the original data and this step's premises; a one-way implication is not an equivalence.(greater_equal, [25, -26, 1], 27, [-25, 26, -1], -27, multiply_constraint_by_minus_one_to_obtain_less_equal)
The full substitutions and premise checks give the original answer; source identity,format and status are unchanged.
Review date: 2026-10-26
Original questions, answers, step expressions, numeric ASTs and historical records are retained. Source candidate labels remain historical and are not overwritten as formal proof.
input commit: 0f7be61e2c22317a4075561dc822c87d881a50dboriginal question SHA-256: 382225eb56cf5ca49d746a6d679d2a76b20a9fef70ce422dd5afbde278288c53candidate record SHA-256: d1b919a60d39dacc31f684ce5f9c161a96629b165ec1c2504ea6479b54b0a53dsemantic review receipt SHA-256: 6212b8b0b3b273f3a514e26ebd17d7e81219c56a8f47e40047ee2b6bf01d1ba3question-first witness SHA-256: f32a23d5e1b66c7794c60def58741bcdfacff24f3cdfc9bc48109c8f71543cf3Lean: NOT_RUN · human review: NOT_PERFORMED