# Question 27099: An Affine Error on the Whole Unit Interval Has an Exact Attained Supremum

[Return to catalogue page 136](https://ocme.evemisslab.com/en/questions/page/136/)

[← Question derivation index](https://ocme.evemisslab.com/en/questions/) · [Original question batch](https://ocme.evemisslab.com/en/practice/batch-20261015-advance-20261117-r03-uniform-limit-continuity-theorem-foundations/#q-20261015-advance-20261117-r03-uniform-limit-continuity-theorem-0024)

This teaching derivation has second-context AI mathematical and bilingual semantic review, limited to the model and assumptions stated in this question. It has no human review or new Lean proof and does not promote the original question or MKO to Canonical truth.

R0053-27099 · q-20261015-advance-20261117-r03-uniform-limit-continuity-theorem-0024



## Original question and givens

On [0,1] let f(x)=m*x+b and f_n(x)=f(x)+E*x/(n+1), with exact m=-1,b=24,E=24>0,n=24≥1. Give (base_slope, base_intercept, error_scale, n, function_description, sup_error, attainment_statement, uniform_certificate).


- G001 — On [0,1] let f(x)=m*x+b and f_n(x)=f(x)+E*x/(n+1), with exact m=-1,b=24,E=24>0,n=24≥1. Give (base_slope, base_intercept, error_scale, n, function_description, sup_error, attainment_statement, uniform_certificate).





## Definition and scope

Use the original question domain, assumptions and cited MKO definitions. This item has second-context mathematical and bilingual review, with the model, answer and every arithmetic step independently recomputed from the original parameters; the source question remains a candidate.


- [mko-uniform-limit-continuity-theorem](https://ocme.evemisslab.com/en/mko/mko-uniform-limit-continuity-theorem/)





## Step-by-step derivation

S001 · impliesBefore

source roles = [uniform-sup-certificate]

After

derived = [[base_slope, base_intercept, error_scale, n, function_description, sup_error, attainment_statement, uniform_certificate]]

Conditions: none

List the complete source field order and mode-specific roles without JavaScript or answer-shape inference;No,undefined and infinity retain their distinct meanings.

Step identifiers and dependenciesRule: source_ordered_fields_without_JS · Uses: G001





S002 · calculationBefore

Uniform ORIGINAL error over n plus one := div(24, 25)

After

Uniform ORIGINAL error over n plus one = 24/25

Conditions: none

Substitute original roles and established intermediates exactly;no approximation,slot substitution or internally consistent changed operand.

Step identifiers and dependenciesRule: exact_rational_arithmetic · Uses: G001, S001





S003 · impliesBefore

source roles = [-1, 24, 24, 24]

After

derived = [f(x)=base_slope*x+base_intercept, f_n(x)-f(x)=(24)*x/25, 24/25, EVERY x in[0,1]:0<=x<=1;attain at x=1, Yes]

Conditions: none

The given affine law covers the WHOLE[0,1],not sampled points.Subtraction cancels the same base.With E>0,the absolute error is E*x/(n+1)<=E/(n+1) for every x,and x=1 attains it.Hence this is the exact supremum;the affine terms and limit are continuous.

Step identifiers and dependenciesRule: Uniform_WHOLE_affine_difference_absolute_bound_and_attainment · Uses: G001, S002









## Reverse checks


- S003 · premise_and_result_audit — Reverse-check the complete original data,step operands and premises;finite checks,conditional named-theorem use and general formal proof remain distinct.
- S002 · premise_and_result_audit — Recompute Uniform ORIGINAL error over n plus one with exact rational arithmetic, not rounded decimals.
- S001 · premise_and_result_audit — Reverse-check the complete original data,step operands and premises;finite checks,conditional named-theorem use and general formal proof remain distinct.





## Result

(-1, 24, 24, 24, f_n(x)=-1x+24+24x/25, 24/25, sup_on_[0,1]_attained_at_x=1, Yes)

The full substitutions and premise checks give the original answer; source identity,format and status are unchanged.





## This question review and source binding

Review date: 2026-10-26

Original questions, answers, step expressions, numeric ASTs and historical records are retained. Source candidate labels remain historical and are not overwritten as formal proof.

Source hashes and review receipts
- input commit: 0f7be61e2c22317a4075561dc822c87d881a50db
- original question SHA-256: 84b82143b74d79af964389e1117f48bdb8cf787ce165c2f643c716dba1b56155
- candidate record SHA-256: d6fc7e919451ee83f9780d2afb595524d0c29dcd85b8e60e955f483530e3bd4b
- semantic review receipt SHA-256: 1b7a62514347b82518305d5feb4369a52d7d44c442a0f2b131e9eb3cd7b45f62
- question-first witness SHA-256: 79dc2a1077081f3ea2a03f75e32778163bf05e814cdf4c29ed86e567295f9ee1
- Lean: NOT_RUN · human review: NOT_PERFORMED

[Same-source full JSON](https://ocme.evemisslab.com/data/question-derivations/questions/q-20261015-advance-20261117-r03-uniform-limit-continuity-theorem-0024.json)