# Question 27691: Outside-Scope Inputs Are Not General Strong-Law Counterexamples

[Return to catalogue page 139](https://ocme.evemisslab.com/en/questions/page/139/)

[← Question derivation index](https://ocme.evemisslab.com/en/questions/) · [Original question batch](https://ocme.evemisslab.com/en/practice/batch-20261015-advance-20261118-r02-strong-law-large-numbers-finite-valued-iid-foundations/#q-20261015-advance-20261118-r02-strong-law-large-numbers-finite-valued-iid-0091)

This teaching derivation has second-context AI mathematical and bilingual semantic review, limited to the model and assumptions stated in this question. It has no human review or new Lean proof and does not promote the original question or MKO to Canonical truth.

R0054-27691 · q-20261015-advance-20261118-r02-strong-law-large-numbers-finite-valued-iid-0091



## Original question and givens

Use mode=wrong_target, complete model={"values":[-2,-1],"probabilities":[[2,5],[3,5]],"target":17}. Give (mode, common_mean, proposed_target, target_equals_common_mean, proposed_target_claim, boundary).


- G001 — Use mode=wrong_target, complete model={"values":[-2,-1],"probabilities":[[2,5],[3,5]],"target":17}. Give (mode, common_mean, proposed_target, target_equals_common_mean, proposed_target_claim, boundary).





## Definition and scope

Use the original question domain, assumptions and cited MKO definitions. This item has second-context mathematical and bilingual review, with the model, answer and every arithmetic step independently recomputed from the original parameters; the source question remains a candidate.


- [mko-strong-law-large-numbers-finite-valued-iid](https://ocme.evemisslab.com/en/mko/mko-strong-law-large-numbers-finite-valued-iid/)





## Step-by-step derivation

S001 · impliesBefore

source roles = [slln-scope-boundary]

After

derived = [[mode, common_mean, proposed_target, target_equals_common_mean, proposed_target_claim, boundary]]

Conditions: none

List the complete operation/mode field order without JavaScript or answer-shape inference;Boolean,string,null and an unclaimed result remain distinct.

Step identifiers and dependenciesRule: source_ordered_fields_without_JS · Uses: G001





S002 · calculationBefore

SLLN boundary target law ORIGINAL mass sum0 := sum(0, 2/5)

After

SLLN boundary target law ORIGINAL mass sum0 = 2/5

Conditions: none

Substitute original roles and established intermediates exactly,not approximations or internally consistent changed operands;extra teaching algebra adds no source-domain gate.

Step identifiers and dependenciesRule: exact_rational_arithmetic · Uses: G001, S001





S003 · calculationBefore

SLLN boundary target law ORIGINAL mass sum1 := sum(2/5, 3/5)

After

SLLN boundary target law ORIGINAL mass sum1 = 1

Conditions: none

Substitute original roles and established intermediates exactly,not approximations or internally consistent changed operands;extra teaching algebra adds no source-domain gate.

Step identifiers and dependenciesRule: exact_rational_arithmetic · Uses: G001, S002





S004 · calculationBefore

SLLN boundary target law ORIGINAL weighted value0 := mul(-2, 2/5)

After

SLLN boundary target law ORIGINAL weighted value0 = -4/5

Conditions: none

Substitute original roles and established intermediates exactly,not approximations or internally consistent changed operands;extra teaching algebra adds no source-domain gate.

Step identifiers and dependenciesRule: exact_rational_arithmetic · Uses: G001, S003





S005 · calculationBefore

SLLN boundary target law ORIGINAL mean sum0 := sum(0, -4/5)

After

SLLN boundary target law ORIGINAL mean sum0 = -4/5

Conditions: none

Substitute original roles and established intermediates exactly,not approximations or internally consistent changed operands;extra teaching algebra adds no source-domain gate.

Step identifiers and dependenciesRule: exact_rational_arithmetic · Uses: G001, S004





S006 · calculationBefore

SLLN boundary target law exact unbounded value square0 := mul(-2, -2)

After

SLLN boundary target law exact unbounded value square0 = 4

Conditions: none

Substitute original roles and established intermediates exactly,not approximations or internally consistent changed operands;extra teaching algebra adds no source-domain gate.

Step identifiers and dependenciesRule: exact_rational_arithmetic · Uses: G001, S005





S007 · calculationBefore

SLLN boundary target law ORIGINAL weighted square0 := mul(4, 2/5)

After

SLLN boundary target law ORIGINAL weighted square0 = 8/5

Conditions: none

Substitute original roles and established intermediates exactly,not approximations or internally consistent changed operands;extra teaching algebra adds no source-domain gate.

Step identifiers and dependenciesRule: exact_rational_arithmetic · Uses: G001, S006





S008 · calculationBefore

SLLN boundary target law ORIGINAL second moment sum0 := sum(0, 8/5)

After

SLLN boundary target law ORIGINAL second moment sum0 = 8/5

Conditions: none

Substitute original roles and established intermediates exactly,not approximations or internally consistent changed operands;extra teaching algebra adds no source-domain gate.

Step identifiers and dependenciesRule: exact_rational_arithmetic · Uses: G001, S007





S009 · calculationBefore

SLLN boundary target law ORIGINAL weighted value1 := mul(-1, 3/5)

After

SLLN boundary target law ORIGINAL weighted value1 = -3/5

Conditions: none

Substitute original roles and established intermediates exactly,not approximations or internally consistent changed operands;extra teaching algebra adds no source-domain gate.

Step identifiers and dependenciesRule: exact_rational_arithmetic · Uses: G001, S008





S010 · calculationBefore

SLLN boundary target law ORIGINAL mean sum1 := sum(-4/5, -3/5)

After

SLLN boundary target law ORIGINAL mean sum1 = -7/5

Conditions: none

Substitute original roles and established intermediates exactly,not approximations or internally consistent changed operands;extra teaching algebra adds no source-domain gate.

Step identifiers and dependenciesRule: exact_rational_arithmetic · Uses: G001, S009





S011 · calculationBefore

SLLN boundary target law exact unbounded value square1 := mul(-1, -1)

After

SLLN boundary target law exact unbounded value square1 = 1

Conditions: none

Substitute original roles and established intermediates exactly,not approximations or internally consistent changed operands;extra teaching algebra adds no source-domain gate.

Step identifiers and dependenciesRule: exact_rational_arithmetic · Uses: G001, S010





S012 · calculationBefore

SLLN boundary target law ORIGINAL weighted square1 := mul(1, 3/5)

After

SLLN boundary target law ORIGINAL weighted square1 = 3/5

Conditions: none

Substitute original roles and established intermediates exactly,not approximations or internally consistent changed operands;extra teaching algebra adds no source-domain gate.

Step identifiers and dependenciesRule: exact_rational_arithmetic · Uses: G001, S011





S013 · calculationBefore

SLLN boundary target law ORIGINAL second moment sum1 := sum(8/5, 3/5)

After

SLLN boundary target law ORIGINAL second moment sum1 = 11/5

Conditions: none

Substitute original roles and established intermediates exactly,not approximations or internally consistent changed operands;extra teaching algebra adds no source-domain gate.

Step identifiers and dependenciesRule: exact_rational_arithmetic · Uses: G001, S012





S014 · calculationBefore

SLLN boundary target law ORIGINAL mean squared := mul(-7/5, -7/5)

After

SLLN boundary target law ORIGINAL mean squared = 49/25

Conditions: none

Substitute original roles and established intermediates exactly,not approximations or internally consistent changed operands;extra teaching algebra adds no source-domain gate.

Step identifiers and dependenciesRule: exact_rational_arithmetic · Uses: G001, S013





S015 · calculationBefore

SLLN boundary target law ORIGINAL second minus mean squared := sub(11/5, 49/25)

After

SLLN boundary target law ORIGINAL second minus mean squared = 6/25

Conditions: none

Substitute original roles and established intermediates exactly,not approximations or internally consistent changed operands;extra teaching algebra adds no source-domain gate.

Step identifiers and dependenciesRule: exact_rational_arithmetic · Uses: G001, S014





S016 · impliesBefore

source roles = [SLLN boundary target law, [-2, -1], [[2, 5], [3, 5]]]

After

derived = [[[-2, 2/5], [-1, 3/5]], 1, -7/5, 11/5, 6/25]

Conditions: none

Pair ORIGINAL values/probabilities before numeric sorting and retain zero-mass labels.Qualify the complete nonnegative mass1 law and its source second-minus-mean-square variance.SLLN allows variance0;do not import the CLT positive-variance condition.

Step identifiers and dependenciesRule: SLLN_complete_ORIGINAL_numeric_value_probability_alignment_ALL_moments · Uses: G001, S015





S017 · impliesBefore

source roles = [[[-2, 2/5], [-1, 3/5]], -7/5, 17]

After

derived = [No, No]

Conditions: none

First verify the proposed target actually differs from the common mean.The SLLN target is that mean,not a substituted value.

Step identifiers and dependenciesRule: SLLN_ACTUAL_wrong_target_not_common_expectation · Uses: G001, S016









## Reverse checks


- S017 · premise_and_result_audit — Reverse-check original data,operands,complete scope and premises;finite witnesses,conditional theorem use and formal proof remain distinct.
- S016 · premise_and_result_audit — Reverse-check original data,operands,complete scope and premises;finite witnesses,conditional theorem use and formal proof remain distinct.
- S015 · premise_and_result_audit — Recompute SLLN boundary target law ORIGINAL second minus mean squared with exact rational arithmetic, not rounded decimals.
- S014 · premise_and_result_audit — Recompute SLLN boundary target law ORIGINAL mean squared with exact rational arithmetic, not rounded decimals.
- S013 · premise_and_result_audit — Recompute SLLN boundary target law ORIGINAL second moment sum1 with exact rational arithmetic, not rounded decimals.
- S012 · premise_and_result_audit — Recompute SLLN boundary target law ORIGINAL weighted square1 with exact rational arithmetic, not rounded decimals.
- S011 · premise_and_result_audit — Recompute SLLN boundary target law exact unbounded value square1 with exact rational arithmetic, not rounded decimals.
- S010 · premise_and_result_audit — Recompute SLLN boundary target law ORIGINAL mean sum1 with exact rational arithmetic, not rounded decimals.
- S009 · premise_and_result_audit — Recompute SLLN boundary target law ORIGINAL weighted value1 with exact rational arithmetic, not rounded decimals.
- S008 · premise_and_result_audit — Recompute SLLN boundary target law ORIGINAL second moment sum0 with exact rational arithmetic, not rounded decimals.
- S007 · premise_and_result_audit — Recompute SLLN boundary target law ORIGINAL weighted square0 with exact rational arithmetic, not rounded decimals.
- S006 · premise_and_result_audit — Recompute SLLN boundary target law exact unbounded value square0 with exact rational arithmetic, not rounded decimals.
- S005 · premise_and_result_audit — Recompute SLLN boundary target law ORIGINAL mean sum0 with exact rational arithmetic, not rounded decimals.
- S004 · premise_and_result_audit — Recompute SLLN boundary target law ORIGINAL weighted value0 with exact rational arithmetic, not rounded decimals.
- S003 · premise_and_result_audit — Recompute SLLN boundary target law ORIGINAL mass sum1 with exact rational arithmetic, not rounded decimals.
- S002 · premise_and_result_audit — Recompute SLLN boundary target law ORIGINAL mass sum0 with exact rational arithmetic, not rounded decimals.
- S001 · premise_and_result_audit — Reverse-check original data,operands,complete scope and premises;finite witnesses,conditional theorem use and formal proof remain distinct.





## Result

(wrong_target, -7/5, 17, No, No, SLLN_target_is_common_expectation)

The full substitutions and premise checks give the original answer; source identity,format and status are unchanged.





## This question review and source binding

Review date: 2026-10-26

Original questions, answers, step expressions, numeric ASTs and historical records are retained. Source candidate labels remain historical and are not overwritten as formal proof.

Source hashes and review receipts
- input commit: 0f7be61e2c22317a4075561dc822c87d881a50db
- original question SHA-256: dfcc259e2d3f8d361e67af54b3e329b35a1a117963313901ecdb4ea999cc0fc7
- candidate record SHA-256: 5df9096a8679e26510cec91f07af60e3fca87e113fbaf5324ab03f1eb4d85202
- semantic review receipt SHA-256: 0a76d8e93c08bb16998a0483f3dfc0504f269fc3e1982e6cd868cab0a2856d54
- question-first witness SHA-256: 09127b736c225714dfa0b7ceb0e6a6e66df27438b480cad8217d3c2f99ce9437
- Lean: NOT_RUN · human review: NOT_PERFORMED

[Same-source full JSON](https://ocme.evemisslab.com/data/question-derivations/questions/q-20261015-advance-20261118-r02-strong-law-large-numbers-finite-valued-iid-0091.json)




