Explore related knowledge and questions →
← Question derivation index · Original question batch
R0054-27752 · q-20261015-advance-20261118-r04-wilson-theorem-0002
Use exact integer n=3>1. Give (n, prime, running_factorial_residues, factorial_residue, minus_one_residue, Wilson_congruence, instance_equivalence, instance_scope).
G001 — Use exact integer n=3>1. Give (n, prime, running_factorial_residues, factorial_residue, minus_one_residue, Wilson_congruence, instance_equivalence, instance_scope).Use the original question domain, assumptions and cited MKO definitions. This item has second-context mathematical and bilingual review, with the model, answer and every arithmetic step independently recomputed from the original parameters; the source question remains a candidate.
Before
source roles = [wilson-domain-factorial]
After
derived = [[n, prime, running_factorial_residues, factorial_residue, minus_one_residue, Wilson_congruence, instance_equivalence, instance_scope]]
Conditions: none
List the complete operation/mode field order without JavaScript or answer-shape inference;Boolean,string,null and an unclaimed result remain distinct.
Rule: source_ordered_fields_without_JS · Uses: G001
Before
Wilson ORIGINAL factorial ORIGINAL running factorial product1 := mul(1, 1)
After
Wilson ORIGINAL factorial ORIGINAL running factorial product1 = 1
Conditions: none
Substitute original roles and established intermediates exactly,not approximations or internally consistent changed operands;extra teaching algebra adds no source-domain gate.
Rule: exact_rational_arithmetic · Uses: G001, S001
Before
source roles = [Wilson ORIGINAL factorial, 3, 1, 1, 1]
After
derived = [0, 1, Yes, Yes]
Conditions: none
Retain the prior residue and full product at every k,then its unique Euclidean remainder in0..n-1.The invariant is value congruent to k! mod n,not an assumed last table entry.
Rule: Wilson_EACH_running_factorial_exact_Euclidean_remainder · Uses: G001, S002
Before
Wilson ORIGINAL factorial ORIGINAL running factorial product2 := mul(1, 2)
After
Wilson ORIGINAL factorial ORIGINAL running factorial product2 = 2
Conditions: none
Substitute original roles and established intermediates exactly,not approximations or internally consistent changed operands;extra teaching algebra adds no source-domain gate.
Rule: exact_rational_arithmetic · Uses: G001, S003
Before
source roles = [Wilson ORIGINAL factorial, 3, 2, 1, 2]
After
derived = [0, 2, Yes, Yes]
Conditions: none
Retain the prior residue and full product at every k,then its unique Euclidean remainder in0..n-1.The invariant is value congruent to k! mod n,not an assumed last table entry.
Rule: Wilson_EACH_running_factorial_exact_Euclidean_remainder · Uses: G001, S004
Before
source roles = [3, [[1, 1], [2, 2]]]
After
derived = [Yes, 2, 2, Yes, Yes]
Conditions: none
Qualify primality and congruence separately.Both may be False at a composite while equivalence is True.The converse has a separate argument:a proper divisor d>=2 of composite n divides both n and(n-1)!;a congruence to-1 would force d to divide1,a contradiction.This reasoning is not a single instance or finite-cutoff test.
Rule: Wilson_prime_classification_instance_flags_AND_separate_converse_reason · Uses: G001, S005
S006 · premise_and_result_audit — Reverse-check original data,operands,complete scope and premises;finite witnesses,conditional theorem use and formal proof remain distinct.S005 · premise_and_result_audit — Reverse-check original data,operands,complete scope and premises;finite witnesses,conditional theorem use and formal proof remain distinct.S004 · premise_and_result_audit — Recompute Wilson ORIGINAL factorial ORIGINAL running factorial product2 with exact rational arithmetic, not rounded decimals.S003 · premise_and_result_audit — Reverse-check original data,operands,complete scope and premises;finite witnesses,conditional theorem use and formal proof remain distinct.S002 · premise_and_result_audit — Recompute Wilson ORIGINAL factorial ORIGINAL running factorial product1 with exact rational arithmetic, not rounded decimals.S001 · premise_and_result_audit — Reverse-check original data,operands,complete scope and premises;finite witnesses,conditional theorem use and formal proof remain distinct.(3, Yes, [[1, 1], [2, 2]], 2, 2, Yes, Yes, Wilson_equivalence_instance)
The full substitutions and premise checks give the original answer; source identity,format and status are unchanged.
Review date: 2026-10-26
Original questions, answers, step expressions, numeric ASTs and historical records are retained. Source candidate labels remain historical and are not overwritten as formal proof.
input commit: 0f7be61e2c22317a4075561dc822c87d881a50dboriginal question SHA-256: 2d17f04eaff5a81c2ae29fc296476588904b59b35639c857cd74ffaebf4404fbcandidate record SHA-256: d70b31639b7646444b7093e9c0e5c7e63c3121eb042f8d252bcc35232540dc23semantic review receipt SHA-256: 0a76d8e93c08bb16998a0483f3dfc0504f269fc3e1982e6cd868cab0a2856d54question-first witness SHA-256: 09127b736c225714dfa0b7ceb0e6a6e66df27438b480cad8217d3c2f99ce9437Lean: NOT_RUN · human review: NOT_PERFORMED