Explore related knowledge and questions →

Question 27714: Wilson Domain, Finite Testing, Fermat Comparison and the p=2 Exception Stay Separate

On this page
  1. Original question and givens
  2. Definition and scope
  3. Step-by-step derivation
  4. Reverse checks
  5. Result
  6. This question review and source binding

Return to catalogue page 139

← Question derivation index · Original question batch

R0054-27714 · q-20261015-advance-20261118-r04-wilson-theorem-0089

Original question and givens

Use mode=invalid_n and exact integer n=-13. Give (mode, n, Wilson_domain_qualified, boundary).

  • G001 — Use mode=invalid_n and exact integer n=-13. Give (mode, n, Wilson_domain_qualified, boundary).

Definition and scope

Use the original question domain, assumptions and cited MKO definitions. This item has second-context mathematical and bilingual review, with the model, answer and every arithmetic step independently recomputed from the original parameters; the source question remains a candidate.

Step-by-step derivation

S001 · implies

Before

source roles = [wilson-boundary]

After

derived = [[mode, n, Wilson_domain_qualified, boundary]]

Conditions: none

List the complete operation/mode field order without JavaScript or answer-shape inference;Boolean,string,null and an unclaimed result remain distinct.

Step identifiers and dependencies

Rule: source_ordered_fields_without_JS · Uses: G001

S002 · implies

Before

source roles = [-13]

After

derived = [No]

Conditions: none

The theorem requires modulus n>1.For n<=1 withhold domain qualification;do not compute mod0 or invent negative factorials.

Step identifiers and dependencies

Rule: Wilson_domain_n_GREATER1_no_factorial_mod_zero · Uses: G001, S001

Reverse checks

  • S002 · premise_and_result_audit — Reverse-check original data,operands,complete scope and premises;finite witnesses,conditional theorem use and formal proof remain distinct.
  • S001 · premise_and_result_audit — Reverse-check original data,operands,complete scope and premises;finite witnesses,conditional theorem use and formal proof remain distinct.

Result

(invalid_n, -13, No, Wilson_domain_requires_n>1)

The full substitutions and premise checks give the original answer; source identity,format and status are unchanged.

This question review and source binding

Review date: 2026-10-26

Original questions, answers, step expressions, numeric ASTs and historical records are retained. Source candidate labels remain historical and are not overwritten as formal proof.

Source hashes and review receipts
  • input commit: 0f7be61e2c22317a4075561dc822c87d881a50db
  • original question SHA-256: 2b6005f23d39fda01e0782e75376dfd2eb8a9d3897e3e4f3c16e300f0713ea89
  • candidate record SHA-256: cefe47e04ea7f2dd1807cb89df5b4dd83191a223bb3f7114945b561927b289e2
  • semantic review receipt SHA-256: 0a76d8e93c08bb16998a0483f3dfc0504f269fc3e1982e6cd868cab0a2856d54
  • question-first witness SHA-256: 09127b736c225714dfa0b7ceb0e6a6e66df27438b480cad8217d3c2f99ce9437
  • Lean: NOT_RUN · human review: NOT_PERFORMED
Same-source full JSON