OCMEBilingual mathematics & derivations繁體中文

Explore related knowledge and questions →

Question 27411: Zero, Composite Bases, Negative Inputs and Cancellation Need Distinct Conventions

On this page
  1. Original question and givens
  2. Definition and scope
  3. Step-by-step derivation
  4. Reverse checks
  5. Result
  6. This question review and source binding

Return to catalogue page 138

← Question derivation index · Original question batch

R0053-27411 · q-20261015-advance-20261118-r05-p-adic-valuation-integers-0086

Original question and givens

Use mode=negative_normalization, base p=5, integer a=-55. Give (mode, p, integer_a, absolute_a, valuation, negative_integer_valid, scope).

  • G001 — Use mode=negative_normalization, base p=5, integer a=-55. Give (mode, p, integer_a, absolute_a, valuation, negative_integer_valid, scope).

Definition and scope

Use the original question domain, assumptions and cited MKO definitions. This item has second-context mathematical and bilingual review, with the model, answer and every arithmetic step independently recomputed from the original parameters; the source question remains a candidate.

Step-by-step derivation

S001 · implies

Before

source roles = [pval-boundary]

After

derived = [[mode, p, integer_a, absolute_a, valuation, negative_integer_valid, scope]]

Conditions: none

List the complete source field order and mode-specific roles without JavaScript or answer-shape inference;No,undefined and infinity retain their distinct meanings.

Step identifiers and dependencies

Rule: source_ordered_fields_without_JS · Uses: G001

S002 · calculation

Before

Valuation boundary ORIGINAL negative ORIGINAL division step1 := div(55, 5)

After

Valuation boundary ORIGINAL negative ORIGINAL division step1 = 11

Conditions: none

Substitute original roles and established intermediates exactly;no approximation,slot substitution or internally consistent changed operand.

Step identifiers and dependencies

Rule: exact_rational_arithmetic · Uses: G001, S001

S003 · calculation

Before

Valuation boundary ORIGINAL negative dividing prime power1 := mul(1, 5)

After

Valuation boundary ORIGINAL negative dividing prime power1 = 5

Conditions: none

Substitute original roles and established intermediates exactly;no approximation,slot substitution or internally consistent changed operand.

Step identifiers and dependencies

Rule: exact_rational_arithmetic · Uses: G001, S002

S004 · implies

Before

source roles = [Valuation boundary ORIGINAL negative, 5, 55, 55, 1]

After

derived = [11, 5, 0, Yes]

Conditions: none

Divide only when the current unit is divisible by p.Each step preserves |a|=p^k*unit and strictly decreases the positive unit,so it terminates.Derived integers do not inherit the raw-input1e6 cap.

Step identifiers and dependencies

Rule: Valuation_EACH_division_source_remainder_and_factor_invariant · Uses: G001, S003

S005 · calculation

Before

Valuation boundary ORIGINAL negative terminal factorization product := mul(5, 11)

After

Valuation boundary ORIGINAL negative terminal factorization product = 55

Conditions: none

Substitute original roles and established intermediates exactly;no approximation,slot substitution or internally consistent changed operand.

Step identifiers and dependencies

Rule: exact_rational_arithmetic · Uses: G001, S004

S006 · implies

Before

source roles = [Valuation boundary ORIGINAL negative, 5, -55, 55, 1, 11, [5]]

After

derived = [55, 1, Yes, Yes]

Conditions: none

At termination p does not divide the unit,so p^(k+1) does not divide |a| and k is maximal.A sign does not affect divisibility;the factorization is for |a|,not negative a equalling a positive product.

Step identifiers and dependencies

Rule: Valuation_terminal_NONdivisible_unit_highest_power · Uses: G001, S005

Reverse checks

  • S006 · premise_and_result_audit — Reverse-check the complete original data,step operands and premises;finite checks,conditional named-theorem use and general formal proof remain distinct.
  • S005 · premise_and_result_audit — Recompute Valuation boundary ORIGINAL negative terminal factorization product with exact rational arithmetic, not rounded decimals.
  • S004 · premise_and_result_audit — Reverse-check the complete original data,step operands and premises;finite checks,conditional named-theorem use and general formal proof remain distinct.
  • S003 · premise_and_result_audit — Recompute Valuation boundary ORIGINAL negative dividing prime power1 with exact rational arithmetic, not rounded decimals.
  • S002 · premise_and_result_audit — Recompute Valuation boundary ORIGINAL negative ORIGINAL division step1 with exact rational arithmetic, not rounded decimals.
  • S001 · premise_and_result_audit — Reverse-check the complete original data,step operands and premises;finite checks,conditional named-theorem use and general formal proof remain distinct.

Result

(negative_normalization, 5, -55, 55, 1, Yes, negative_integer_is_valid)

The full substitutions and premise checks give the original answer; source identity,format and status are unchanged.

This question review and source binding

Review date: 2026-10-26

Original questions, answers, step expressions, numeric ASTs and historical records are retained. Source candidate labels remain historical and are not overwritten as formal proof.

Source hashes and review receipts
  • input commit: 0f7be61e2c22317a4075561dc822c87d881a50db
  • original question SHA-256: 81018a7901441d21c4bf35970cc1c9aa6f544459b771f00d43766407782efffc
  • candidate record SHA-256: dc3532581879bd04770543397114a6867bf8a167d5a5c0d06b2d177a8ed517fa
  • semantic review receipt SHA-256: 1b7a62514347b82518305d5feb4369a52d7d44c442a0f2b131e9eb3cd7b45f62
  • question-first witness SHA-256: 79dc2a1077081f3ea2a03f75e32778163bf05e814cdf4c29ed86e567295f9ee1
  • Lean: NOT_RUN · human review: NOT_PERFORMED
Same-source full JSON