Explore related knowledge and questions →

Question 27417: Zero, Composite Bases, Negative Inputs and Cancellation Need Distinct Conventions

On this page
  1. Original question and givens
  2. Definition and scope
  3. Step-by-step derivation
  4. Reverse checks
  5. Result
  6. This question review and source binding

Return to catalogue page 138

← Question derivation index · Original question batch

R0053-27417 · q-20261015-advance-20261118-r05-p-adic-valuation-integers-0092

Original question and givens

Use mode=zero_convention, base p=11, integer a=0. Give (mode, p, integer_a, valuation, convention).

  • G001 — Use mode=zero_convention, base p=11, integer a=0. Give (mode, p, integer_a, valuation, convention).

Definition and scope

Use the original question domain, assumptions and cited MKO definitions. This item has second-context mathematical and bilingual review, with the model, answer and every arithmetic step independently recomputed from the original parameters; the source question remains a candidate.

Step-by-step derivation

S001 · implies

Before

source roles = [pval-boundary]

After

derived = [[mode, p, integer_a, valuation, convention]]

Conditions: none

List the complete source field order and mode-specific roles without JavaScript or answer-shape inference;No,undefined and infinity retain their distinct meanings.

Step identifiers and dependencies

Rule: source_ordered_fields_without_JS · Uses: G001

S002 · implies

Before

source roles = [Valuation boundary ORIGINAL zero, 11, 0]

After

derived = [infinity, 0, 0, []]

Conditions: none

Zero is divisible by every power of p,so has no highest finite exponent.Use the single serializable infinity sentinel,not numeric0 or an undefined error.

Step identifiers and dependencies

Rule: Valuation_zero_SINGLE_infinity_convention · Uses: G001, S001

Reverse checks

  • S002 · premise_and_result_audit — Reverse-check the complete original data,step operands and premises;finite checks,conditional named-theorem use and general formal proof remain distinct.
  • S001 · premise_and_result_audit — Reverse-check the complete original data,step operands and premises;finite checks,conditional named-theorem use and general formal proof remain distinct.

Result

(zero_convention, 11, 0, infinity, single_serializable_zero_convention)

The full substitutions and premise checks give the original answer; source identity,format and status are unchanged.

This question review and source binding

Review date: 2026-10-26

Original questions, answers, step expressions, numeric ASTs and historical records are retained. Source candidate labels remain historical and are not overwritten as formal proof.

Source hashes and review receipts
  • input commit: 0f7be61e2c22317a4075561dc822c87d881a50db
  • original question SHA-256: a2e9c43f46ac688109490114aa2fbad671be8a9652c1d47fb23d0ae8be8f3a6b
  • candidate record SHA-256: f0823d29a200ef305d40da3c329c1963809748623d4666692323dbbc2e1efef3
  • semantic review receipt SHA-256: 1b7a62514347b82518305d5feb4369a52d7d44c442a0f2b131e9eb3cd7b45f62
  • question-first witness SHA-256: 79dc2a1077081f3ea2a03f75e32778163bf05e814cdf4c29ed86e567295f9ee1
  • Lean: NOT_RUN · human review: NOT_PERFORMED
Same-source full JSON