Explore related knowledge and questions →

Question 27336: One Split or Bounded Words Cannot Resolve the Pumping Quantifiers or Prove Regularity

On this page
  1. Original question and givens
  2. Definition and scope
  3. Step-by-step derivation
  4. Reverse checks
  5. Result
  6. This question review and source binding

Return to catalogue page 137

← Question derivation index · Original question batch

R0053-27336 · q-20261015-advance-20261118-r07-pumping-lemma-regular-languages-0086

Original question and givens

Use mode=bounded_words, complete model={"alphabet":["a","b"],"max_checked_length":1}. Give (mode, alphabet, max_checked_length, checked_word_count, regularity_proof_claim, boundary).

  • G001 — Use mode=bounded_words, complete model={"alphabet":["a","b"],"max_checked_length":1}. Give (mode, alphabet, max_checked_length, checked_word_count, regularity_proof_claim, boundary).

Definition and scope

Use the original question domain, assumptions and cited MKO definitions. This item has second-context mathematical and bilingual review, with the model, answer and every arithmetic step independently recomputed from the original parameters; the source question remains a candidate.

Step-by-step derivation

S001 · implies

Before

source roles = [pump-boundary]

After

derived = [[mode, alphabet, max_checked_length, checked_word_count, regularity_proof_claim, boundary]]

Conditions: none

List the complete source field order and mode-specific roles without JavaScript or answer-shape inference;No,undefined and infinity retain their distinct meanings.

Step identifiers and dependencies

Rule: source_ordered_fields_without_JS · Uses: G001

S002 · implies

Before

source roles = [[a, b], 1]

After

derived = [[[0, 1, 1], [1, 2, 3]], 3, No]

Conditions: none

There are |A|^k words of length k;even an empty alphabet retains epsilon.The exact count covers only the declared bound and budget<=4096.Finite word checks do not prove regularity,and pumping itself is necessary,not sufficient.

Step identifiers and dependencies

Rule: Pumping_bounded_word_budget_actual_empty_alphabet_and_NO_regularity · Uses: G001, S001

Reverse checks

  • S002 · premise_and_result_audit — Reverse-check the complete original data,step operands and premises;finite checks,conditional named-theorem use and general formal proof remain distinct.
  • S001 · premise_and_result_audit — Reverse-check the complete original data,step operands and premises;finite checks,conditional named-theorem use and general formal proof remain distinct.

Result

(bounded_words, [a, b], 1, 3, No, bounded_words_do_not_prove_regular)

The full substitutions and premise checks give the original answer; source identity,format and status are unchanged.

This question review and source binding

Review date: 2026-10-26

Original questions, answers, step expressions, numeric ASTs and historical records are retained. Source candidate labels remain historical and are not overwritten as formal proof.

Source hashes and review receipts
  • input commit: 0f7be61e2c22317a4075561dc822c87d881a50db
  • original question SHA-256: c4514667d33649a9396692c2e4853d7fa115e74784c59fcc22a8dcfd56e910c4
  • candidate record SHA-256: 44de7f6bc8fb3555b760d3a64d3d8d354683fc0d4fb722241bf1863da311119d
  • semantic review receipt SHA-256: 1b7a62514347b82518305d5feb4369a52d7d44c442a0f2b131e9eb3cd7b45f62
  • question-first witness SHA-256: 79dc2a1077081f3ea2a03f75e32778163bf05e814cdf4c29ed86e567295f9ee1
  • Lean: NOT_RUN · human review: NOT_PERFORMED
Same-source full JSON