Explore related knowledge and questions →

Question 27918: Regular Equality Conditions Are Necessary, Not Sufficient, and Not Inequality KKT

On this page
  1. Original question and givens
  2. Definition and scope
  3. Step-by-step derivation
  4. Reverse checks
  5. Result
  6. This question review and source binding

Return to catalogue page 140

← Question derivation index · Original question batch

R0054-27918 · q-20261015-pulse-20261119-r04-0093

Original question and givens

Use mode=stationary_not_sufficient, complete model={"scale":18}. Give (mode, objective_description, constraint_description, point, stationarity_statement, stationary, actual_point_status, minimum_claim, boundary).

  • G001 — Use mode=stationary_not_sufficient, complete model={"scale":18}. Give (mode, objective_description, constraint_description, point, stationarity_statement, stationary, actual_point_status, minimum_claim, boundary).

Definition and scope

Use the original question domain, assumptions and cited MKO definitions. This item has second-context mathematical and bilingual review, with the model, answer and every arithmetic step independently recomputed from the original parameters; the source question remains a candidate.

Step-by-step derivation

S001 · implies

Before

source roles = [lagrange-boundary]

After

derived = [[mode, objective_description, constraint_description, point, stationarity_statement, stationary, actual_point_status, minimum_claim, boundary]]

Conditions: none

List the complete operation/mode field order without JavaScript or answer-shape inference;Boolean,string,null and an unclaimed result remain distinct.

Step identifiers and dependencies

Rule: source_ordered_fields_without_JS · Uses: G001

S002 · implies

Before

source roles = [18]

After

derived = [stationary_not_sufficient, f(x,y)=-18*x^2, g(x,y)=y=0, [0,0], grad_f=[0,0]=0*grad_g, Yes, strict_local_maximum_on_constraint, No, first_order_multiplier_equation_is_necessary_not_sufficient_for_a_minimum]

Conditions: none

grad g=(0,1) is nonzero and the origin is feasible;grad f there is0,so lambda0 satisfies the equation.But feasible(x,0) has f=-sx²<0=f(0,0),a strict constrained maximum.Stationarity is not sufficient for a minimum.

Step identifiers and dependencies

Rule: Lagrange_ACTUAL_regular_stationary_constrained_MAXIMUM · Uses: G001, S001

Reverse checks

  • S002 · premise_and_result_audit — Reverse-check original data,operands,complete scope and premises;finite witnesses,conditional theorem use and formal proof remain distinct.
  • S001 · premise_and_result_audit — Reverse-check original data,operands,complete scope and premises;finite witnesses,conditional theorem use and formal proof remain distinct.

Result

(stationary_not_sufficient, f(x,y)=-18*x^2, g(x,y)=y=0, [0,0], grad_f=[0,0]=0*grad_g, Yes, strict_local_maximum_on_constraint, No, first_order_multiplier_equation_is_necessary_not_sufficient_for_a_minimum)

The full substitutions and premise checks give the original answer; source identity,format and status are unchanged.

This question review and source binding

Review date: 2026-10-26

Original questions, answers, step expressions, numeric ASTs and historical records are retained. Source candidate labels remain historical and are not overwritten as formal proof.

Source hashes and review receipts
  • input commit: 0f7be61e2c22317a4075561dc822c87d881a50db
  • original question SHA-256: ed5f0381c5688dc53cec7535cb662686f73a098f09f84a9f1e09a4376b01c713
  • candidate record SHA-256: 52bf119a8fc52d795dc2689f5f079b85b20cdce3d1c9f1b95c73114d2494f075
  • semantic review receipt SHA-256: 0a76d8e93c08bb16998a0483f3dfc0504f269fc3e1982e6cd868cab0a2856d54
  • question-first witness SHA-256: 09127b736c225714dfa0b7ceb0e6a6e66df27438b480cad8217d3c2f99ce9437
  • Lean: NOT_RUN · human review: NOT_PERFORMED
Same-source full JSON