A complete six-element action on four points

On this page
  1. Goal and scope
  2. Givens and symbols
  3. Rules and sources
  4. Main derivation
  5. Substeps and lemmas
  6. Reverse audits
  7. Error controls and negative controls
  8. Result and limitations
  9. Verification and source binding

← Guide index · Original MKO

derivation-mko-finite-group-action-01 · ocme-new142-reader-adoption-20261021

Goal and scope

The explicit 24-entry table is a valid group action, but it is neither free nor transitive.

Complete Cayley/action tables and universal formulas; permutation rows alone do not qualify an action.

Givens and symbols

  • calc
  • G1 — G={e,r,r2,s,rs,r2s}, encoded respectively (0,0),(1,0),(2,0),(0,1),(1,1),(2,1), with (i,j)(k,l)=(i+(-1)^j*k mod3,j+l mod2). Points X={0,1,2,3}; (i,j) acts on x<3 by i+(-1)^j*x mod3 and fixes 3.
  • G — six-element group carrier
  • r,s — labels with r^3=e,s^2=e,sr=r^2s
  • X — four points

Rules and sources

  • calc · prerequisite — Assume exact arithmetic modulo 3 and 2, extensional finite-set equality, and definitions of groups/actions; this operation is not pre-assumed to be a group.
  • mko_definition · cited — Use one complete finite Cayley table, complete point carrier and total action table. Check e*x=x and (g*h)*x=g*(h*x) for all relevant indices. Each group element then induces a permutation, but validity alone does not certify faithful, free or transitive action. Sampled pairs are insufficient. · mko-finite-group-action

Main derivation

S01 · implies

Before

G=\{e,r,r^2,s,rs,r^2s\}

After

\begin{array}{c|cccccc}*&e&r&r^2&s&rs&r^2s\\\hline e&e&r&r^2&s&rs&r^2s\\r&r&r^2&e&rs&r^2s&s\\r^2&r^2&e&r&r^2s&s&rs\\s&s&r^2s&rs&e&r^2&r\\rs&rs&s&r^2s&r&e&r^2\\r^2s&r^2s&rs&s&r^2&r&e\\\end{array}

Conditions: none

Rule: calc · Uses: G1

Leaf basis: calc

Expand the pair formula for all 36 products; every output belongs to the same six-element carrier and no cell is missing.

S02 · implies

Before

(i,j)(k,l)=(i+(-1)^jk,j+l)\quad(\bmod(3,2))

After

((i,j)(k,l))(m,n)=(i+(-1)^jk+(-1)^{j+l}m,j+l+n)=(i,j)((k,l)(m,n));\quad e=(0,0);\quad(i,j)^{-1}=(-(-1)^ji,j)

Conditions: none

Rule: calc · Uses: G1, S01

Leaf basis: calc

Both bracketings have identical coordinates, proving associativity for all 216 triples; (0,0) is a two-sided identity and the inverse formula multiplies back on both sides.

S03 · implies

Before

X=\{0,1,2,3\}

After

\begin{array}{c|cccc}\cdot&0&1&2&3\\\hline e&0&1&2&3\\r&1&2&0&3\\r^2&2&0&1&3\\s&0&2&1&3\\rs&1&0&2&3\\r^2s&2&1&0&3\\\end{array}

Conditions: none

Rule: calc · Uses: G1, S02

Leaf basis: calc

Expand all 24 action values. For x<3, g*(h*x)=i+(-1)^j*k+(-1)^(j+l)*x=(gh)*x; both sides fix 3, and e fixes every point.

S04 · implies

Before

g^{-1}(g\cdot x)=(g^{-1}g)\cdot x=e\cdot x=x

After

x\mapsto g\cdot x\text{ has inverse }x\mapsto g^{-1}\cdot x

Conditions: none

Rule: calc · Uses: G1, S02, S03

Leaf basis: calc

The established action axioms and group inverse supply an inverse function for each row, so every g induces a permutation.

S05 · implies

Before

s\ne e,\quad s\cdot0=0

After

\text{the action is not free}

Conditions: none

Rule: calc · Uses: G1, S01, S03

Leaf basis: calc

Nonidentity s fixes point 0, directly refuting freeness.

S06 · implies

Before

g\cdot0\in\{0,1,2\}\quad\forall g\in G

After

3\notin G\cdot0\Rightarrow\text{not transitive}

Conditions: none

Rule: calc · Uses: G1, S03

Leaf basis: calc

The complete 0-column contains only 0,1,2; no g sends 0 to 3, so the action is not transitive.

S07 · implies

Before

K=\{e,u\},\ u^2=e,\quad Y=\{0,1\}

After

\begin{array}{c|cc}*&e&u\\\hline e&e&u\\u&u&e\end{array}\quad\begin{array}{c|cc}\cdot&0&1\\\hline e&0&1\\u&0&1\end{array}

Conditions: none

Rule: calc · Uses: G1, S03, S04

Leaf basis: calc

A complete C2 table and trivial action are shown: every element acts identically, so compatibility holds, but nonidentity u also acts identically and the action is not faithful.

S08 · implies

Before

e\cdot x=x,\quad(gh)\cdot x=g\cdot(h\cdot x)\text{ for all indices}

After

G\curvearrowright X\text{ is qualified; free/faithful/transitive require separate certificates}

Conditions: none

Rule: mko_definition · Uses: G1, S03, S04, S05, S06, S07

Leaf basis: mko_definition

Identity and compatibility are fully checked in the same model; extra properties cannot be added automatically.

Substeps and lemmas

No substeps in this guide.

Reverse audits

  • S08 · premise_audit · G1, S03, S04, S05, S06, S07 — S05,S06,S07 illustrate three distinct extra obligations rather than folding them into the action definition.
  • S07 · premise_audit · G1, S03, S04 — The small group's laws descend from addition modulo 2, and both sides of trivial-action compatibility are x.
  • S06 · premise_audit · G1, S03 — 3 is part of the point carrier and is fixed by all g; it cannot be removed to alter the conclusion.
  • S05 · premise_audit · G1, S01, S03 — A valid action need not be free, so this does not contradict S03.
  • S04 · premise_audit · G1, S02, S03 — Being permutations follows from the axioms; visually permutation-like rows do not prove those axioms.
  • S03 · premise_audit · G1, S02 — Every group-point pair has one value; the formula covers all 144 triples, not merely permutation rows.
  • S02 · premise_audit · G1, S01 — The sign depends only on j+l modulo 2 since (-1)^2=1; the full inverse list is e,r^2,r,s,rs,r^2s.
  • S01 · premise_audit · G1 — The six labels bind the six pairs; r^2 is not an additional seventh element.

Error controls and negative controls

Same group table

Bind every product, inverse and coset to this complete Cayley table.

Complete enumeration

Every universal finite property needs the full carrier or a universal formula, not a proper sample.

  • Permutation rows always give an action. → reject — On two points assign C3 rows e=id,r=swap,r2=id; r2*r=e but id composed with swap is not id, so compatibility fails.
  • Every valid action is free. → reject — Here s is not e yet fixes 0.
  • Every valid action is transitive or faithful. → reject — The two-point trivial C2 action in S07 is neither transitive nor faithful.

Result and limitations

The explicit 24-entry table is a valid group action, but it is neither free nor transitive.

    Verification and source binding

    0 declared checks for this guide; only the listed expressions are covered.

    • source commit: b1b2f1dcf8c50d67a93fe52d95f8eef7b3abba9f
    • adopted source SHA-256: 66876f6517e8e0f296b1b8edfb9302c71f46b693da283ac405ce212032fd0684
    • original source SHA-256: 66876f6517e8e0f296b1b8edfb9302c71f46b693da283ac405ce212032fd0684
    • Lean: NOT_RUN · independent AI: SCOPED_LEAD_AND_BILINGUAL_CONTEXT_REVIEW

    Same-source full JSON (formulas, ASTs, controls and revision log)