S01 · implies
Before
n\ge2
After
0\le a_n=(3/4)2^{-n}\le2^{-n}=b_nConditions: none
Rule: algebra · Uses: G1
Leaf basis: algebra
The coefficient 3/4 lies between zero and one, proving the same-direction comparison for every tail term.
derivation-mko-series-comparison-test-01 · ocme-new142-reader-adoption-20261021
Prove convergence using geometric upper comparison despite a finite prefix, and show divergent lower comparison.
Every nonnegative tail term after cutoff N=2 is explicit; finite-prefix signs are unrestricted.
algebraepsilonnonnegative_seriesG1 — a_0=5,a_1=-1; a_n=(3/4)*2^{-n} for n≥2; b_n=2^{-n} for n≥2.N=2 — whole-tail cutoffA_M — nonnegative-tail partial summko_definition · cited — For every sufficiently large n require0≤a_n≤b_n. Convergence of the b series implies convergence of the a series; divergence of the a series implies divergence of the b series. Exact families use geometric tails, arbitrary finite prefixes and positive constant lower bounds. Finitely many terms do not change convergence, but every tail comparison is a universal obligation. Negative terms, a reversed inequality, finitely sampled comparisons or a divergent upper bound do not supply the required test. · mko-series-comparison-testalgebra · prerequisite — Use real-field identities; division requires a nonzero denominator and multiplication by a positive number preserves inequalities.epsilon · prerequisite — Convergence requires for every positive epsilon an integer N controlling every n≥N by a strict error bound; use the Archimedean property of the reals.nonnegative_series · prerequisite — Nonnegative partial sums increase; if bounded they converge by real completeness, and if unbounded they diverge; a finite prefix only adds a fixed constant.Before
n\ge2
After
0\le a_n=(3/4)2^{-n}\le2^{-n}=b_nConditions: none
Rule: algebra · Uses: G1
Leaf basis: algebra
The coefficient 3/4 lies between zero and one, proving the same-direction comparison for every tail term.
Before
\sum_{n=2}^{M}b_nAfter
\sum_{n=2}^{M}2^{-n}=1/2-2^{-M}\to1/2Conditions: none
Rule: algebra · Uses: G1
Leaf basis: algebra
Finite geometric subtraction independently certifies convergence of the upper reference series.
Before
A_M=\sum_{n=2}^{M}a_nAfter
0\le A_M\le\sum_{n=2}^{M}b_n\le1/2Conditions: none
Rule: algebra · Uses: S01, S02
Leaf basis: algebra
Summing the nonnegative termwise bounds gives an upper bound on every tail partial sum.
Before
A_M\text{ nondecreasing and bounded above}After
\sum_{n=2}^{\infty}a_n\text{ converges}Conditions: none
Rule: nonnegative_series · Uses: S01, S03
Leaf basis: nonnegative_series
Nonnegativity gives monotonicity and the bound enables completeness, which is the actual upper-comparison proof.
Before
\sum_{n=0}^{M}a_n=5-1+(3/4)\sum_{n=2}^{M}2^{-n}After
\sum_{n=0}^{\infty}a_n=4+3/8=35/8Conditions: none
Rule: algebra · Uses: G1, S02, S04
Leaf basis: algebra
The full law also yields the exact sum; the finite prefix adds only four.
Before
c_n=1,\quad d_n=1+2^{-n}\quad(n\ge2)After
0\le c_n\le d_n,\quad\sum_{n=2}^{M}c_n=M-1Conditions: none
Rule: algebra · Uses: G1
Leaf basis: algebra
Use a separate complete nonnegative lower comparison; the constant-term sums are unbounded.
Before
\sum_{n=2}^{M}d_n\ge M-1\to\inftyAfter
\sum d_n\text{ diverges}Conditions: none
Rule: nonnegative_series · Uses: S06
Leaf basis: nonnegative_series
Divergence of the lower reference forces divergence of the larger nonnegative series.
Before
0\le u_n\le v_n\text{ eventually}After
\sum v_n\text{ convergent}\Rightarrow\sum u_n\text{ convergent};\quad\sum u_n\text{ divergent}\Rightarrow\sum v_n\text{ divergent}Conditions: \exists N\ \forall n\ge N:\ 0\le u_n\le v_n
Rule: algebra · Uses: S01, S04, S06, S07
Leaf basis: algebra
The two partial-sum arguments apply to any supplied whole-tail comparison; finitely many initial terms are removed as a fixed constant.
No substeps in this guide.
S08 · premise_audit · S01, S04, S06, S07 — This is a conditional directional argument, not an extrapolation to unverified comparisons.S07 · premise_audit · S06 — A divergent upper bound would give no such conclusion.S06 · premise_audit · G1 — The new c,d laws are distinct from the main a,b laws.S05 · premise_audit · G1, S02, S04 — Prefix signs are not treated as a tail convergence certificate.S04 · premise_audit · S01, S03 — Arbitrary negative tail terms would invalidate this monotonicity proof.S03 · premise_audit · S01, S02 — The inequality covers every M≥2, not a finite grid.S02 · premise_audit · G1 — Reference convergence is not guessed from the compared series.S01 · premise_audit · G1 — No nonnegative comparison is imposed on negative prefix term a_1.Use an upper reference for convergence and a lower reference for divergence.
After specifying N prove nonnegative comparison for every later term.
reject — 2^{-n}≤1/n for n≥1, but the former converges and the latter diverges.reject — Every n≥N is required.reject — The prefix is separated; the entire tail after N=2 is nonnegative.The main series converges to 35/8; the positive lower bound c_n=1 forces the d series to diverge.
1 declared checks for this guide; only the listed expressions are covered.
b1b2f1dcf8c50d67a93fe52d95f8eef7b3abba9ffd28c54d3495eae6e7b299be008c76fd110252a14dcfe00ac96ae8711826fd0afd28c54d3495eae6e7b299be008c76fd110252a14dcfe00ac96ae8711826fd0aSCOPED_LEAD_AND_BILINGUAL_CONTEXT_REVIEWSame-source full JSON (formulas, ASTs, controls and revision log)