S01 · implies
Before
\{0,1\},\quad p=(1/2,1/2)After
p_0,p_1\ge0,\quad p_0+p_1=1
Conditions: none
Rule: work · Uses: G1, work
Leaf basis: work
First validate the complete common finite marginal.
derivation-mko-strong-law-large-numbers-finite-valued-iid-01 · ocme-new142-reader-adoption-20261021
Match the named SLLN hypotheses while separating prefix audits from a.s. proof.
Infinite IID is a premise and finite-valued SLLN is a named theorem.
workG1 — On a supplied probability space, (X_i)_{i≥1} is an infinite IID sequence: every finite distinct-index joint law factors into Bernoulli(1/2) marginals. This is a whole-process premise, not inferred from finite data.bar X_n — sample meanμ — common marginal meanmko_definition · cited — Assume an explicit infinite IID process and a normalized finite common marginal law with mean mu. The strong-law conclusion is P(lim_(n→infinity) n^(-1)sum_(i=1)^n X_i=mu)=1. Exact families recalculate the marginal mean, a fixed prefix sample mean and a complete fixed-n deviation-event probability. They expressly do not certify the probability-one limit. The infinite_iid certificate token is a declared process premise, not verification of infinite independence. Zero variance is allowed. Non-IID and nonfinite support are outside this finite-valued theorem scope, not counterexamples to every SLLN; a finite prefix does not establish a limit and a different target is not the common mean. · mko-strong-law-large-numbers-finite-valued-iidwork · prerequisite — Explicit named theorem prerequisite: an infinite IID finite-valued sequence on a given probability space has sample means converging a.s. to the common mean; also assume the binomial law and continuity from above of probability.Before
\{0,1\},\quad p=(1/2,1/2)After
p_0,p_1\ge0,\quad p_0+p_1=1
Conditions: none
Rule: work · Uses: G1, work
Leaf basis: work
First validate the complete common finite marginal.
Before
\mu=0(1/2)+1(1/2)
After
\mu=1/2,\quad |X_i|\le1\text{ a.s.}Conditions: none
Rule: work · Uses: G1, S01, work
Leaf basis: work
Finite support supplies the common mean and bounded integrability.
Before
x_1,x_2,x_3,x_4=(1,0,1,1)
After
\bar x_4=3/4
Conditions: none
Rule: work · Uses: G1, S02, work
Leaf basis: work
A specified path prefix has sample mean 3/4.
Before
S_4\sim\operatorname{Binomial}(4,1/2)After
P(S_4=k)=(1,4,6,4,1)_k/16\quad(k=0,1,2,3,4)
Conditions: none
Rule: work · Uses: G1, S03, work
Leaf basis: work
Use IID to list the full fixed-n=4 law.
Before
|S_4/4-1/2|\ge1/4
After
S_4\in\{0,1,3,4\},\quad P=10/16=5/8Conditions: none
Rule: work · Uses: G1, S04, work
Leaf basis: work
The fixed-n event includes threshold equality and sums exactly four terms.
Before
\text{infinite IID common finite law}After
P\!\left(\lim_{n\to\infty}\frac1n\sum_{i=1}^{n}X_i=1/2\right)=1\quad\text{(named SLLN)}Conditions: none
Rule: work · Uses: G1, S05, work
Leaf basis: work
Apply the explicit finite-valued SLLN: infinite IID, finite support and common mean are supplied.
Before
P(\lim_n\bar X_n=1/2)=1
After
\bar X_n\to1/2\quad\text{almost surely}Conditions: none
Rule: work · Uses: G1, S06, work
Leaf basis: work
A probability-one convergence event gives the a.s. conclusion, not every abstract path.
Before
X_i\equiv c\text{ a.s.}\quad\text{(boundary)}After
\bar X_n=c\text{ a.s. for every }nConditions: none
Rule: work · Uses: G1, S07, work
Leaf basis: work
A zero-variance finite law still qualifies; the strong law does not need CLT nondegeneracy.
No substeps in this guide.
S08 · premise_audit · G1, S07, work — Nonfinite support is outside this slice, not a claim that every general strong law fails.S07 · premise_audit · G1, S06, work — The all-ones event E is the intersection over m≥1 of measurable events{X1 through Xm all equal1}. Each finite-prefix event has probability 2^(-m); continuity from above gives P(E)=lim2^(-m)=0, without treating sample points as paths or singletons.S06 · premise_audit · G1, S05, work — The value 5/8 is not the limit-event probability; the limit uses the named theorem.S05 · premise_audit · G1, S04, work — k=2 is excluded while k=1,3 are included.S04 · premise_audit · G1, S03, work — The five lattice points exhaust the possible sums.S03 · premise_audit · G1, S02, work — A prefix value different from mean 1/2 is no contradiction.S02 · premise_audit · G1, S01, work — Boundedness concerns every i under the common law.S01 · premise_audit · G1, work — This alone does not construct an infinite joint process.Keep finite-law validation separate from the infinite IID premise.
Do not interchange fixed-n deviation5/8 with probability 1 of a limit event.
reject — A limit does not require equality at finite n.reject — Constant IID sequences satisfy this finite-valued strong law.reject — It is only outside this slice; other strong laws have different hypotheses.By the named SLLN the mean tends a.s. to 1/2; fixed-n=4 deviation probability 5/8 neither proves nor refutes that limit.
3 declared checks for this guide; only the listed expressions are covered.
b1b2f1dcf8c50d67a93fe52d95f8eef7b3abba9fbdda8ad449130122c4fb072fb2338389ae3e3f6902e49ee7a1976ed50d7d5044da6d2c78524cf0fe83d2656b7f968e993ea5d1eb189113dbdbc2977b902653d6SCOPED_LEAD_AND_BILINGUAL_CONTEXT_REVIEWSame-source full JSON (formulas, ASTs, controls and revision log)