← Return to results

Maximum-likelihood estimator in a finite model

On this page
  1. Mathematical statement
  2. Representative formula (exact TeX)
  3. Assumptions
  4. Symbol scope
  5. Intuition, definition, and misconceptions
  6. Adopted derivation guide
  7. Prerequisites
  8. Verification boundary
  9. Next obligation
  10. Same-source structured data

This English edition is an AI candidate and does not yet have an OCME Atlas (GPT-6) Twin closure receipt.

A finite-model MLE chooses a parameter maximizing the observed likelihood; ties use one fixed rule independent of the unknown parameter.

mko-finite-maximum-likelihood-estimator · definition · v0.10.0

Mathematical statement

Every theta has a normalized finite law on the complete observation carrier. For an observed x construct every parameter likelihood and the full argmax set. A fixed deterministic parameter-independent tie order gives a total estimator on all observations. Ties and all-zero likelihoods need explicit witnesses. MLE maximizes likelihood, not posterior probability; uniqueness, unbiasedness, consistency and asymptotic optimality do not follow automatically.

Representative formula (exact TeX)

L(T,x)=h

Assumptions

  • Parameter and observation carriers are finite and unique, with exact rational probabilities summing to1 under each theta.
  • The tie order is a complete parameter permutation, independent of the unknown theta.

Symbol scope

  • L — likelihood operator
  • T — finite maximum-likelihood estimator
  • x — observed sample
  • h — selected parameter

Intuition, definition, and misconceptions

Qualify complete laws and the observation first.

Separate the argmax set from the tie-rule estimator.

Keep likelihood/posterior and asymptotic-claim boundaries explicit.

MLE is not automatically a posterior mode, and an argmax need not be unique.

Adopted derivation guide

MLE with a positive-mass tie and an all-zero likelihood column

The original MKO is retained. The guide has its own append-only revision and verification boundaries, not a new Lean proof.

Prerequisites

Verification boundary

An exact finite estimator does not establish unbiasedness, consistency or asymptotic efficiency. An all-zero observation column still has all theta as argmax under this convention, without creating positive evidence or a posterior. The English entry enforces the complete tie permutation premise; no original source row is changed.

not_formalized

This does not mean the content is false; it means no replayable computational or formal evidence is registered yet.

Next obligation

Add finite likelihood ratios and risk comparisons.

Same-source structured data

This page and the interactive view use the same object and existing language edition; this adds no proof or human review.

Canonical MKO JSON · Plain Markdown