← Return to results

Sufficient statistic in a finite model

On this page
  1. Mathematical statement
  2. Representative formula (exact TeX)
  3. Assumptions
  4. Symbol scope
  5. Intuition, definition, and misconceptions
  6. Adopted derivation guide
  7. Prerequisites
  8. Verification boundary
  9. Next obligation
  10. Same-source structured data

This English edition is an AI candidate and does not yet have an OCME Atlas (GPT-6) Twin closure receipt.

A statistic is sufficient when the conditional sample law given its value does not depend on theta wherever that condition has positive mass.

mko-finite-sufficient-statistic · definition · v0.10.0

Mathematical statement

A statistic is a total map on the full sample carrier and its fibers form a partition. For every (theta,t) first compute P_theta(T=t). Define and calculate the exact fiber conditional law only on a positive-mass cell, then compare all valid theta laws at each t. Leave zero-mass conditions undefined, encoded as null in these outputs. Separate explicit nonsufficiency witnesses, the identity statistic and the constant-statistic boundary. No factorization theorem or estimator-quality conclusion is introduced.

Representative formula (exact TeX)

S(T,t)=b

Assumptions

  • Complete finite parameter-indexed sampling laws are normalized separately under each theta.
  • The statistic is total and all fibers are complete.

Symbol scope

  • S — sufficiency predicate
  • T — finite statistic
  • t — statistic value
  • b — sufficiency Boolean

Intuition, definition, and misconceptions

Qualify the total statistic and fiber partition first.

Compute every positive-mass conditional table.

Separate theta invariance, nonsufficiency and zero-mass boundaries.

Do not fabricate a law on a zero-mass condition or infer estimator quality merely from data reduction.

Adopted derivation guide

A sufficiency certificate from every fibre conditional law

The original MKO is retained. The guide has its own append-only revision and verification boundaries, not a new Lean proof.

Prerequisites

Verification boundary

This finite-model certificate does not use the factorization theorem. Null denotes an undefined conditional law, not a zero distribution.

not_formalized

This does not mean the content is false; it means no replayable computational or formal evidence is registered yet.

Next obligation

Add a factorization criterion.

Same-source structured data

This page and the interactive view use the same object and existing language edition; this adds no proof or human review.

Canonical MKO JSON · Plain Markdown