Probability on finite sample spaces

On this page
  1. Mathematical statement
  2. Representative formula (exact TeX)
  3. Assumptions
  4. Symbol scope
  5. Intuition, definition, and misconceptions
  6. Adopted derivation guide
  7. Prerequisites
  8. Verification boundary
  9. Next obligation
  10. Same-source structured data

This English edition is an AI candidate and does not yet have an OCME Atlas (GPT-6) Twin closure receipt.

Assign nonnegative weights summing to one on a nonempty finite sample space. An event probability is the sum of the weights of its outcomes.

mko-probability · definition · v0.10.0

Mathematical statement

Let S be a nonempty finite sample space and F=𝒫(S) its event family, where 𝒫 denotes the full powerset and P denotes the probability law. Assign rational weights w_s≥0 to all s∈S with Σ_(s∈S)w_s=1. For E⊆S, P(E)=Σ_(s∈E)w_s. The formula P(E)=|E|/|S| applies only when all outcomes are explicitly equiprobable.

Representative formula (exact TeX)

P(E)

Assumptions

  • S is finite and nonempty, its elementary outcomes are distinct, and the event family is the full powerset.
  • Weights are exact nonnegative rational numbers summing exactly to one, and E must be a subset of S.

Symbol scope

  • P — finite probability law
  • E — event subset of the sample space

Intuition, definition, and misconceptions

First validate every weight and their total, then sum the weights of the event outcomes. Event cardinality is not a probability in general; elementary outcomes may have different weights.

P(∅)=0 and P(S)=1. The complement is taken relative to the same S, with P(S∖E)=1−P(E). A nonempty event can have probability zero when all its outcomes have zero weight.

The exercises use explicit integer outcome labels and rational weights with a common denominator for exact calculation and model-validity checks. They do not infer real-world experimental probabilities, establish independence or conditional probability, or extend to a general measure-theoretic definition.

Common errors include dividing favorable counts by total counts without equiprobability, or inferring that E is empty from P(E)=0.

Adopted derivation guide

Probability on finite sample spaces: validating a weight model, computing event probabilities and complements

The original MKO is retained. The guide has its own append-only revision and verification boundaries, not a new Lean proof.

Prerequisites

  • Event — Fix the sample space and event subsets, keeping outcomes distinct from events.
  • Ratio and proportion — Equiprobable counts and rational-weight arithmetic require valid ratios with nonzero denominators.

Verification boundary

Explicit finite rational weights can be recomputed completely; formal Evidence for general probability measures and countable additivity has not been established.

not_formalized

This does not mean the content is false; it means no replayable computational or formal evidence is registered yet.

Next obligation

Bind finite PMFs, rational-weight normalization, event sums, and relative complements; use a separate semantic bridge for the measure layer.

Same-source structured data

This page and the interactive view use the same object and existing language edition; this adds no proof or human review.

Canonical MKO JSON · Plain Markdown