The denominators q=1 and s=2 are nonzero. Are 3/1 and 6/2 equivalent?
G001 — The denominators q=1 and s=2 are nonzero. Are 3/1 and 6/2 equivalent?
Definition and scope
Use the original question domain, assumptions and cited MKO definitions. This item has second-context mathematical and bilingual review, with the model, answer and every arithmetic step independently recomputed from the original parameters; the source question remains a candidate.
Separate source banks:legacy RAW SAFE with unbounded derived BigInts versus BASE Number.isInteger without invented SAFE/million caps.Operations,domains and permissive/exact keys follow THIS bank.Keep ORIGINAL JSON intact.
Rational equivalence ORIGINAL p times s := mul(3, 2)
After
Rational equivalence ORIGINAL p times s = 6
Conditions: none
Calculate exactly from ORIGINAL ordered operands;mul/sub/div have EXPLICITLY TWO operands.Legacy derived BigInts are not recapped at RAW SAFE;check BASE Number type/representation conditions separately.Do not use floating approximations to force an answer.
Rational equivalence ORIGINAL r times q := mul(6, 1)
After
Rational equivalence ORIGINAL r times q = 6
Conditions: none
Calculate exactly from ORIGINAL ordered operands;mul/sub/div have EXPLICITLY TWO operands.Legacy derived BigInts are not recapped at RAW SAFE;check BASE Number type/representation conditions separately.Do not use floating approximations to force an answer.
FIRST qualify BOTH nonzero denominators,THEN compare p*s=r*q.Negative denominators are allowed for EQUATIONS,unlike order-direction issues.Do not compare decimal appearance or accept0=0 with an undefined ratio.
S004 · premise_and_result_audit — Reverse-check THIS question’s ORIGINAL givens,domain and step premises.Preserve originals/English/MKOs/ASTs/status;do not reverse a one-way implication or call finite checks independent review or general formal proof.
S003 · premise_and_result_audit — Recompute Rational equivalence ORIGINAL r times q with exact rational arithmetic, not rounded decimals.
S002 · premise_and_result_audit — Recompute Rational equivalence ORIGINAL p times s with exact rational arithmetic, not rounded decimals.
S001 · premise_and_result_audit — Reverse-check THIS question’s ORIGINAL givens,domain and step premises.Preserve originals/English/MKOs/ASTs/status;do not reverse a one-way implication or call finite checks independent review or general formal proof.
Result
Yes
The full substitutions and premise checks give the original answer; source identity,format and status are unchanged.
This question review and source binding
Review date: 2026-10-26
Original questions, answers, step expressions, numeric ASTs and historical records are retained. Source candidate labels remain historical and are not overwritten as formal proof.