Rational Number Foundations

This batch has passed Schema, deduplication, source-snapshot, and independent-answer recomputation checks; it is still not marked as human-reviewed.

This question bank has corresponding bilingual step-by-step derivations. Source candidate and English ai_candidate states are retained. AI review, finite computation and Lean formal proof are labelled separately.

batch-20260920-rational-number-foundations · 2026-09-20 · 100 questions

This English edition is an AI candidate and does not yet have an OCME Atlas (GPT-6) Twin closure receipt.

1. Valid Rational Representation

Both p=-12 and q=0 are explicitly integers. Is p/q a valid rational-number representation?

View answer and explanation

No

q=0, so the denominator is zero and no ordinary rational value is defined.

Reviewed step-by-step derivation

Rational number · qf-rational-valid-representation · candidate

2. Valid Rational Representation

Both p=-11 and q=2 are explicitly integers. Is p/q a valid rational-number representation?

View answer and explanation

Yes

q=2≠0, so -11/2 is a valid representation.

Reviewed step-by-step derivation

Rational number · qf-rational-valid-representation · candidate

3. Valid Rational Representation

Both p=-10 and q=3 are explicitly integers. Is p/q a valid rational-number representation?

View answer and explanation

Yes

q=3≠0, so -10/3 is a valid representation.

Reviewed step-by-step derivation

Rational number · qf-rational-valid-representation · candidate

4. Valid Rational Representation

Both p=-9 and q=4 are explicitly integers. Is p/q a valid rational-number representation?

View answer and explanation

Yes

q=4≠0, so -9/4 is a valid representation.

Reviewed step-by-step derivation

Rational number · qf-rational-valid-representation · candidate

5. Valid Rational Representation

Both p=-8 and q=5 are explicitly integers. Is p/q a valid rational-number representation?

View answer and explanation

Yes

q=5≠0, so -8/5 is a valid representation.

Reviewed step-by-step derivation

Rational number · qf-rational-valid-representation · candidate

6. Valid Rational Representation

Both p=-7 and q=0 are explicitly integers. Is p/q a valid rational-number representation?

View answer and explanation

No

q=0, so the denominator is zero and no ordinary rational value is defined.

Reviewed step-by-step derivation

Rational number · qf-rational-valid-representation · candidate

7. Valid Rational Representation

Both p=-6 and q=7 are explicitly integers. Is p/q a valid rational-number representation?

View answer and explanation

Yes

q=7≠0, so -6/7 is a valid representation.

Reviewed step-by-step derivation

Rational number · qf-rational-valid-representation · candidate

8. Valid Rational Representation

Both p=-5 and q=1 are explicitly integers. Is p/q a valid rational-number representation?

View answer and explanation

Yes

q=1≠0, so -5/1 is a valid representation.

Reviewed step-by-step derivation

Rational number · qf-rational-valid-representation · candidate

9. Valid Rational Representation

Both p=-4 and q=2 are explicitly integers. Is p/q a valid rational-number representation?

View answer and explanation

Yes

q=2≠0, so -4/2 is a valid representation.

Reviewed step-by-step derivation

Rational number · qf-rational-valid-representation · candidate

10. Valid Rational Representation

Both p=-3 and q=3 are explicitly integers. Is p/q a valid rational-number representation?

View answer and explanation

Yes

q=3≠0, so -3/3 is a valid representation.

Reviewed step-by-step derivation

Rational number · qf-rational-valid-representation · candidate

11. Valid Rational Representation

Both p=-2 and q=0 are explicitly integers. Is p/q a valid rational-number representation?

View answer and explanation

No

q=0, so the denominator is zero and no ordinary rational value is defined.

Reviewed step-by-step derivation

Rational number · qf-rational-valid-representation · candidate

12. Valid Rational Representation

Both p=-1 and q=5 are explicitly integers. Is p/q a valid rational-number representation?

View answer and explanation

Yes

q=5≠0, so -1/5 is a valid representation.

Reviewed step-by-step derivation

Rational number · qf-rational-valid-representation · candidate

13. Valid Rational Representation

Both p=0 and q=6 are explicitly integers. Is p/q a valid rational-number representation?

View answer and explanation

Yes

q=6≠0, so 0/6 is a valid representation.

Reviewed step-by-step derivation

Rational number · qf-rational-valid-representation · candidate

14. Valid Rational Representation

Both p=1 and q=7 are explicitly integers. Is p/q a valid rational-number representation?

View answer and explanation

Yes

q=7≠0, so 1/7 is a valid representation.

Reviewed step-by-step derivation

Rational number · qf-rational-valid-representation · candidate

15. Valid Rational Representation

Both p=2 and q=1 are explicitly integers. Is p/q a valid rational-number representation?

View answer and explanation

Yes

q=1≠0, so 2/1 is a valid representation.

Reviewed step-by-step derivation

Rational number · qf-rational-valid-representation · candidate

16. Valid Rational Representation

Both p=3 and q=0 are explicitly integers. Is p/q a valid rational-number representation?

View answer and explanation

No

q=0, so the denominator is zero and no ordinary rational value is defined.

Reviewed step-by-step derivation

Rational number · qf-rational-valid-representation · candidate

17. Valid Rational Representation

Both p=4 and q=3 are explicitly integers. Is p/q a valid rational-number representation?

View answer and explanation

Yes

q=3≠0, so 4/3 is a valid representation.

Reviewed step-by-step derivation

Rational number · qf-rational-valid-representation · candidate

18. Valid Rational Representation

Both p=5 and q=4 are explicitly integers. Is p/q a valid rational-number representation?

View answer and explanation

Yes

q=4≠0, so 5/4 is a valid representation.

Reviewed step-by-step derivation

Rational number · qf-rational-valid-representation · candidate

19. Valid Rational Representation

Both p=6 and q=5 are explicitly integers. Is p/q a valid rational-number representation?

View answer and explanation

Yes

q=5≠0, so 6/5 is a valid representation.

Reviewed step-by-step derivation

Rational number · qf-rational-valid-representation · candidate

20. Valid Rational Representation

Both p=7 and q=6 are explicitly integers. Is p/q a valid rational-number representation?

View answer and explanation

Yes

q=6≠0, so 7/6 is a valid representation.

Reviewed step-by-step derivation

Rational number · qf-rational-valid-representation · candidate

21. Valid Rational Representation

Both p=8 and q=0 are explicitly integers. Is p/q a valid rational-number representation?

View answer and explanation

No

q=0, so the denominator is zero and no ordinary rational value is defined.

Reviewed step-by-step derivation

Rational number · qf-rational-valid-representation · candidate

22. Valid Rational Representation

Both p=9 and q=1 are explicitly integers. Is p/q a valid rational-number representation?

View answer and explanation

Yes

q=1≠0, so 9/1 is a valid representation.

Reviewed step-by-step derivation

Rational number · qf-rational-valid-representation · candidate

23. Valid Rational Representation

Both p=10 and q=2 are explicitly integers. Is p/q a valid rational-number representation?

View answer and explanation

Yes

q=2≠0, so 10/2 is a valid representation.

Reviewed step-by-step derivation

Rational number · qf-rational-valid-representation · candidate

24. Valid Rational Representation

Both p=11 and q=3 are explicitly integers. Is p/q a valid rational-number representation?

View answer and explanation

Yes

q=3≠0, so 11/3 is a valid representation.

Reviewed step-by-step derivation

Rational number · qf-rational-valid-representation · candidate

25. Valid Rational Representation

Both p=12 and q=4 are explicitly integers. Is p/q a valid rational-number representation?

View answer and explanation

Yes

q=4≠0, so 12/4 is a valid representation.

Reviewed step-by-step derivation

Rational number · qf-rational-valid-representation · candidate

26. Denominator-Sign Normalization

Normalize -12/-1 to an exact representation with a positive denominator.

View answer and explanation

12/1

Because q=-1 is negative, move only the sign to the numerator. The value is unchanged; no gcd reduction is performed.

Reviewed step-by-step derivation

Rational number · qf-rational-denominator-sign-normalization · candidate

27. Denominator-Sign Normalization

Normalize -11/-2 to an exact representation with a positive denominator.

View answer and explanation

11/2

Because q=-2 is negative, move only the sign to the numerator. The value is unchanged; no gcd reduction is performed.

Reviewed step-by-step derivation

Rational number · qf-rational-denominator-sign-normalization · candidate

28. Denominator-Sign Normalization

Normalize -10/-3 to an exact representation with a positive denominator.

View answer and explanation

10/3

Because q=-3 is negative, move only the sign to the numerator. The value is unchanged; no gcd reduction is performed.

Reviewed step-by-step derivation

Rational number · qf-rational-denominator-sign-normalization · candidate

29. Denominator-Sign Normalization

Normalize -9/-4 to an exact representation with a positive denominator.

View answer and explanation

9/4

Because q=-4 is negative, move only the sign to the numerator. The value is unchanged; no gcd reduction is performed.

Reviewed step-by-step derivation

Rational number · qf-rational-denominator-sign-normalization · candidate

30. Denominator-Sign Normalization

Normalize -8/-5 to an exact representation with a positive denominator.

View answer and explanation

8/5

Because q=-5 is negative, move only the sign to the numerator. The value is unchanged; no gcd reduction is performed.

Reviewed step-by-step derivation

Rational number · qf-rational-denominator-sign-normalization · candidate

31. Denominator-Sign Normalization

Normalize -7/-6 to an exact representation with a positive denominator.

View answer and explanation

7/6

Because q=-6 is negative, move only the sign to the numerator. The value is unchanged; no gcd reduction is performed.

Reviewed step-by-step derivation

Rational number · qf-rational-denominator-sign-normalization · candidate

32. Denominator-Sign Normalization

Normalize -6/-7 to an exact representation with a positive denominator.

View answer and explanation

6/7

Because q=-7 is negative, move only the sign to the numerator. The value is unchanged; no gcd reduction is performed.

Reviewed step-by-step derivation

Rational number · qf-rational-denominator-sign-normalization · candidate

33. Denominator-Sign Normalization

Normalize -5/-8 to an exact representation with a positive denominator.

View answer and explanation

5/8

Because q=-8 is negative, move only the sign to the numerator. The value is unchanged; no gcd reduction is performed.

Reviewed step-by-step derivation

Rational number · qf-rational-denominator-sign-normalization · candidate

34. Denominator-Sign Normalization

Normalize -4/-9 to an exact representation with a positive denominator.

View answer and explanation

4/9

Because q=-9 is negative, move only the sign to the numerator. The value is unchanged; no gcd reduction is performed.

Reviewed step-by-step derivation

Rational number · qf-rational-denominator-sign-normalization · candidate

35. Denominator-Sign Normalization

Normalize -3/-1 to an exact representation with a positive denominator.

View answer and explanation

3/1

Because q=-1 is negative, move only the sign to the numerator. The value is unchanged; no gcd reduction is performed.

Reviewed step-by-step derivation

Rational number · qf-rational-denominator-sign-normalization · candidate

36. Denominator-Sign Normalization

Normalize -2/-2 to an exact representation with a positive denominator.

View answer and explanation

2/2

Because q=-2 is negative, move only the sign to the numerator. The value is unchanged; no gcd reduction is performed.

Reviewed step-by-step derivation

Rational number · qf-rational-denominator-sign-normalization · candidate

37. Denominator-Sign Normalization

Normalize -1/-3 to an exact representation with a positive denominator.

View answer and explanation

1/3

Because q=-3 is negative, move only the sign to the numerator. The value is unchanged; no gcd reduction is performed.

Reviewed step-by-step derivation

Rational number · qf-rational-denominator-sign-normalization · candidate

38. Denominator-Sign Normalization

Normalize 0/-4 to an exact representation with a positive denominator.

View answer and explanation

0/4

Because q=-4 is negative, move only the sign to the numerator. The value is unchanged; no gcd reduction is performed.

Reviewed step-by-step derivation

Rational number · qf-rational-denominator-sign-normalization · candidate

39. Denominator-Sign Normalization

Normalize 1/-5 to an exact representation with a positive denominator.

View answer and explanation

-1/5

Because q=-5 is negative, move only the sign to the numerator. The value is unchanged; no gcd reduction is performed.

Reviewed step-by-step derivation

Rational number · qf-rational-denominator-sign-normalization · candidate

40. Denominator-Sign Normalization

Normalize 2/-6 to an exact representation with a positive denominator.

View answer and explanation

-2/6

Because q=-6 is negative, move only the sign to the numerator. The value is unchanged; no gcd reduction is performed.

Reviewed step-by-step derivation

Rational number · qf-rational-denominator-sign-normalization · candidate

41. Denominator-Sign Normalization

Normalize 3/-7 to an exact representation with a positive denominator.

View answer and explanation

-3/7

Because q=-7 is negative, move only the sign to the numerator. The value is unchanged; no gcd reduction is performed.

Reviewed step-by-step derivation

Rational number · qf-rational-denominator-sign-normalization · candidate

42. Denominator-Sign Normalization

Normalize 4/-8 to an exact representation with a positive denominator.

View answer and explanation

-4/8

Because q=-8 is negative, move only the sign to the numerator. The value is unchanged; no gcd reduction is performed.

Reviewed step-by-step derivation

Rational number · qf-rational-denominator-sign-normalization · candidate

43. Denominator-Sign Normalization

Normalize 5/-9 to an exact representation with a positive denominator.

View answer and explanation

-5/9

Because q=-9 is negative, move only the sign to the numerator. The value is unchanged; no gcd reduction is performed.

Reviewed step-by-step derivation

Rational number · qf-rational-denominator-sign-normalization · candidate

44. Denominator-Sign Normalization

Normalize 6/-1 to an exact representation with a positive denominator.

View answer and explanation

-6/1

Because q=-1 is negative, move only the sign to the numerator. The value is unchanged; no gcd reduction is performed.

Reviewed step-by-step derivation

Rational number · qf-rational-denominator-sign-normalization · candidate

45. Denominator-Sign Normalization

Normalize 7/-2 to an exact representation with a positive denominator.

View answer and explanation

-7/2

Because q=-2 is negative, move only the sign to the numerator. The value is unchanged; no gcd reduction is performed.

Reviewed step-by-step derivation

Rational number · qf-rational-denominator-sign-normalization · candidate

46. Denominator-Sign Normalization

Normalize 8/-3 to an exact representation with a positive denominator.

View answer and explanation

-8/3

Because q=-3 is negative, move only the sign to the numerator. The value is unchanged; no gcd reduction is performed.

Reviewed step-by-step derivation

Rational number · qf-rational-denominator-sign-normalization · candidate

47. Denominator-Sign Normalization

Normalize 9/-4 to an exact representation with a positive denominator.

View answer and explanation

-9/4

Because q=-4 is negative, move only the sign to the numerator. The value is unchanged; no gcd reduction is performed.

Reviewed step-by-step derivation

Rational number · qf-rational-denominator-sign-normalization · candidate

48. Denominator-Sign Normalization

Normalize 10/-5 to an exact representation with a positive denominator.

View answer and explanation

-10/5

Because q=-5 is negative, move only the sign to the numerator. The value is unchanged; no gcd reduction is performed.

Reviewed step-by-step derivation

Rational number · qf-rational-denominator-sign-normalization · candidate

49. Denominator-Sign Normalization

Normalize 11/-6 to an exact representation with a positive denominator.

View answer and explanation

-11/6

Because q=-6 is negative, move only the sign to the numerator. The value is unchanged; no gcd reduction is performed.

Reviewed step-by-step derivation

Rational number · qf-rational-denominator-sign-normalization · candidate

50. Denominator-Sign Normalization

Normalize 12/-7 to an exact representation with a positive denominator.

View answer and explanation

-12/7

Because q=-7 is negative, move only the sign to the numerator. The value is unchanged; no gcd reduction is performed.

Reviewed step-by-step derivation

Rational number · qf-rational-denominator-sign-normalization · candidate

51. Equivalent Fractions

The denominators q=1 and s=2 are nonzero. Are -11/1 and -22/2 equivalent?

View answer and explanation

Yes

-11×2 = -22×1; the fractions are equivalent. This uses exact cross products rather than decimal appearance.

Reviewed step-by-step derivation

Rational number · qf-rational-equivalent-fractions · candidate

52. Equivalent Fractions

The denominators q=2 and s=4 are nonzero. Are -10/2 and -19/4 equivalent?

View answer and explanation

No

-10×4 ≠ -19×2; the fractions are not equivalent. This uses exact cross products rather than decimal appearance.

Reviewed step-by-step derivation

Rational number · qf-rational-equivalent-fractions · candidate

53. Equivalent Fractions

The denominators q=3 and s=6 are nonzero. Are -9/3 and -18/6 equivalent?

View answer and explanation

Yes

-9×6 = -18×3; the fractions are equivalent. This uses exact cross products rather than decimal appearance.

Reviewed step-by-step derivation

Rational number · qf-rational-equivalent-fractions · candidate

54. Equivalent Fractions

The denominators q=4 and s=8 are nonzero. Are -8/4 and -15/8 equivalent?

View answer and explanation

No

-8×8 ≠ -15×4; the fractions are not equivalent. This uses exact cross products rather than decimal appearance.

Reviewed step-by-step derivation

Rational number · qf-rational-equivalent-fractions · candidate

55. Equivalent Fractions

The denominators q=5 and s=10 are nonzero. Are -7/5 and -14/10 equivalent?

View answer and explanation

Yes

-7×10 = -14×5; the fractions are equivalent. This uses exact cross products rather than decimal appearance.

Reviewed step-by-step derivation

Rational number · qf-rational-equivalent-fractions · candidate

56. Equivalent Fractions

The denominators q=6 and s=12 are nonzero. Are -6/6 and -11/12 equivalent?

View answer and explanation

No

-6×12 ≠ -11×6; the fractions are not equivalent. This uses exact cross products rather than decimal appearance.

Reviewed step-by-step derivation

Rational number · qf-rational-equivalent-fractions · candidate

57. Equivalent Fractions

The denominators q=7 and s=14 are nonzero. Are -5/7 and -10/14 equivalent?

View answer and explanation

Yes

-5×14 = -10×7; the fractions are equivalent. This uses exact cross products rather than decimal appearance.

Reviewed step-by-step derivation

Rational number · qf-rational-equivalent-fractions · candidate

58. Equivalent Fractions

The denominators q=1 and s=2 are nonzero. Are -4/1 and -7/2 equivalent?

View answer and explanation

No

-4×2 ≠ -7×1; the fractions are not equivalent. This uses exact cross products rather than decimal appearance.

Reviewed step-by-step derivation

Rational number · qf-rational-equivalent-fractions · candidate

59. Equivalent Fractions

The denominators q=2 and s=4 are nonzero. Are -3/2 and -6/4 equivalent?

View answer and explanation

Yes

-3×4 = -6×2; the fractions are equivalent. This uses exact cross products rather than decimal appearance.

Reviewed step-by-step derivation

Rational number · qf-rational-equivalent-fractions · candidate

60. Equivalent Fractions

The denominators q=3 and s=6 are nonzero. Are -2/3 and -3/6 equivalent?

View answer and explanation

No

-2×6 ≠ -3×3; the fractions are not equivalent. This uses exact cross products rather than decimal appearance.

Reviewed step-by-step derivation

Rational number · qf-rational-equivalent-fractions · candidate

61. Equivalent Fractions

The denominators q=4 and s=8 are nonzero. Are -1/4 and -2/8 equivalent?

View answer and explanation

Yes

-1×8 = -2×4; the fractions are equivalent. This uses exact cross products rather than decimal appearance.

Reviewed step-by-step derivation

Rational number · qf-rational-equivalent-fractions · candidate

62. Equivalent Fractions

The denominators q=5 and s=10 are nonzero. Are 0/5 and 1/10 equivalent?

View answer and explanation

No

0×10 ≠ 1×5; the fractions are not equivalent. This uses exact cross products rather than decimal appearance.

Reviewed step-by-step derivation

Rational number · qf-rational-equivalent-fractions · candidate

63. Equivalent Fractions

The denominators q=6 and s=12 are nonzero. Are 1/6 and 2/12 equivalent?

View answer and explanation

Yes

1×12 = 2×6; the fractions are equivalent. This uses exact cross products rather than decimal appearance.

Reviewed step-by-step derivation

Rational number · qf-rational-equivalent-fractions · candidate

64. Equivalent Fractions

The denominators q=7 and s=14 are nonzero. Are 2/7 and 5/14 equivalent?

View answer and explanation

No

2×14 ≠ 5×7; the fractions are not equivalent. This uses exact cross products rather than decimal appearance.

Reviewed step-by-step derivation

Rational number · qf-rational-equivalent-fractions · candidate

65. Equivalent Fractions

The denominators q=1 and s=2 are nonzero. Are 3/1 and 6/2 equivalent?

View answer and explanation

Yes

3×2 = 6×1; the fractions are equivalent. This uses exact cross products rather than decimal appearance.

Reviewed step-by-step derivation

Rational number · qf-rational-equivalent-fractions · candidate

66. Equivalent Fractions

The denominators q=2 and s=4 are nonzero. Are 4/2 and 9/4 equivalent?

View answer and explanation

No

4×4 ≠ 9×2; the fractions are not equivalent. This uses exact cross products rather than decimal appearance.

Reviewed step-by-step derivation

Rational number · qf-rational-equivalent-fractions · candidate

67. Equivalent Fractions

The denominators q=3 and s=6 are nonzero. Are 5/3 and 10/6 equivalent?

View answer and explanation

Yes

5×6 = 10×3; the fractions are equivalent. This uses exact cross products rather than decimal appearance.

Reviewed step-by-step derivation

Rational number · qf-rational-equivalent-fractions · candidate

68. Equivalent Fractions

The denominators q=4 and s=8 are nonzero. Are 6/4 and 13/8 equivalent?

View answer and explanation

No

6×8 ≠ 13×4; the fractions are not equivalent. This uses exact cross products rather than decimal appearance.

Reviewed step-by-step derivation

Rational number · qf-rational-equivalent-fractions · candidate

69. Equivalent Fractions

The denominators q=5 and s=10 are nonzero. Are 7/5 and 14/10 equivalent?

View answer and explanation

Yes

7×10 = 14×5; the fractions are equivalent. This uses exact cross products rather than decimal appearance.

Reviewed step-by-step derivation

Rational number · qf-rational-equivalent-fractions · candidate

70. Equivalent Fractions

The denominators q=6 and s=12 are nonzero. Are 8/6 and 17/12 equivalent?

View answer and explanation

No

8×12 ≠ 17×6; the fractions are not equivalent. This uses exact cross products rather than decimal appearance.

Reviewed step-by-step derivation

Rational number · qf-rational-equivalent-fractions · candidate

71. Equivalent Fractions

The denominators q=7 and s=14 are nonzero. Are 9/7 and 18/14 equivalent?

View answer and explanation

Yes

9×14 = 18×7; the fractions are equivalent. This uses exact cross products rather than decimal appearance.

Reviewed step-by-step derivation

Rational number · qf-rational-equivalent-fractions · candidate

72. Equivalent Fractions

The denominators q=1 and s=2 are nonzero. Are 10/1 and 21/2 equivalent?

View answer and explanation

No

10×2 ≠ 21×1; the fractions are not equivalent. This uses exact cross products rather than decimal appearance.

Reviewed step-by-step derivation

Rational number · qf-rational-equivalent-fractions · candidate

73. Equivalent Fractions

The denominators q=2 and s=4 are nonzero. Are 11/2 and 22/4 equivalent?

View answer and explanation

Yes

11×4 = 22×2; the fractions are equivalent. This uses exact cross products rather than decimal appearance.

Reviewed step-by-step derivation

Rational number · qf-rational-equivalent-fractions · candidate

74. Equivalent Fractions

The denominators q=3 and s=6 are nonzero. Are 12/3 and 25/6 equivalent?

View answer and explanation

No

12×6 ≠ 25×3; the fractions are not equivalent. This uses exact cross products rather than decimal appearance.

Reviewed step-by-step derivation

Rational number · qf-rational-equivalent-fractions · candidate

75. Equivalent Fractions

The denominators q=4 and s=8 are nonzero. Are 13/4 and 26/8 equivalent?

View answer and explanation

Yes

13×8 = 26×4; the fractions are equivalent. This uses exact cross products rather than decimal appearance.

Reviewed step-by-step derivation

Rational number · qf-rational-equivalent-fractions · candidate

76. Reduced Rational Form

Reduce 0/12 to an exact lowest-terms form with a positive denominator.

View answer and explanation

0/1

The canonical reduced form of zero is 0/1.

Reviewed step-by-step derivation

Rational number · qf-rational-reduced-form · candidate

77. Reduced Rational Form

Reduce -12/8 to an exact lowest-terms form with a positive denominator.

View answer and explanation

-3/2

Divide numerator and denominator by their gcd and normalize the denominator sign; the result is -3/2.

Reviewed step-by-step derivation

Rational number · qf-rational-reduced-form · candidate

78. Reduced Rational Form

Reduce 27/12 to an exact lowest-terms form with a positive denominator.

View answer and explanation

9/4

Divide numerator and denominator by their gcd and normalize the denominator sign; the result is 9/4.

Reviewed step-by-step derivation

Rational number · qf-rational-reduced-form · candidate

79. Reduced Rational Form

Reduce -24/8 to an exact lowest-terms form with a positive denominator.

View answer and explanation

-3/1

Divide numerator and denominator by their gcd and normalize the denominator sign; the result is -3/1.

Reviewed step-by-step derivation

Rational number · qf-rational-reduced-form · candidate

80. Reduced Rational Form

Reduce 45/12 to an exact lowest-terms form with a positive denominator.

View answer and explanation

15/4

Divide numerator and denominator by their gcd and normalize the denominator sign; the result is 15/4.

Reviewed step-by-step derivation

Rational number · qf-rational-reduced-form · candidate

81. Reduced Rational Form

Reduce -36/8 to an exact lowest-terms form with a positive denominator.

View answer and explanation

-9/2

Divide numerator and denominator by their gcd and normalize the denominator sign; the result is -9/2.

Reviewed step-by-step derivation

Rational number · qf-rational-reduced-form · candidate

82. Reduced Rational Form

Reduce 63/12 to an exact lowest-terms form with a positive denominator.

View answer and explanation

21/4

Divide numerator and denominator by their gcd and normalize the denominator sign; the result is 21/4.

Reviewed step-by-step derivation

Rational number · qf-rational-reduced-form · candidate

83. Reduced Rational Form

Reduce -48/8 to an exact lowest-terms form with a positive denominator.

View answer and explanation

-6/1

Divide numerator and denominator by their gcd and normalize the denominator sign; the result is -6/1.

Reviewed step-by-step derivation

Rational number · qf-rational-reduced-form · candidate

84. Reduced Rational Form

Reduce 81/12 to an exact lowest-terms form with a positive denominator.

View answer and explanation

27/4

Divide numerator and denominator by their gcd and normalize the denominator sign; the result is 27/4.

Reviewed step-by-step derivation

Rational number · qf-rational-reduced-form · candidate

85. Reduced Rational Form

Reduce -60/8 to an exact lowest-terms form with a positive denominator.

View answer and explanation

-15/2

Divide numerator and denominator by their gcd and normalize the denominator sign; the result is -15/2.

Reviewed step-by-step derivation

Rational number · qf-rational-reduced-form · candidate

86. Reduced Rational Form

Reduce 99/12 to an exact lowest-terms form with a positive denominator.

View answer and explanation

33/4

Divide numerator and denominator by their gcd and normalize the denominator sign; the result is 33/4.

Reviewed step-by-step derivation

Rational number · qf-rational-reduced-form · candidate

87. Reduced Rational Form

Reduce -72/8 to an exact lowest-terms form with a positive denominator.

View answer and explanation

-9/1

Divide numerator and denominator by their gcd and normalize the denominator sign; the result is -9/1.

Reviewed step-by-step derivation

Rational number · qf-rational-reduced-form · candidate

88. Reduced Rational Form

Reduce 117/12 to an exact lowest-terms form with a positive denominator.

View answer and explanation

39/4

Divide numerator and denominator by their gcd and normalize the denominator sign; the result is 39/4.

Reviewed step-by-step derivation

Rational number · qf-rational-reduced-form · candidate

89. Reduced Rational Form

Reduce -84/8 to an exact lowest-terms form with a positive denominator.

View answer and explanation

-21/2

Divide numerator and denominator by their gcd and normalize the denominator sign; the result is -21/2.

Reviewed step-by-step derivation

Rational number · qf-rational-reduced-form · candidate

90. Reduced Rational Form

Reduce 135/12 to an exact lowest-terms form with a positive denominator.

View answer and explanation

45/4

Divide numerator and denominator by their gcd and normalize the denominator sign; the result is 45/4.

Reviewed step-by-step derivation

Rational number · qf-rational-reduced-form · candidate

91. Reduced Rational Form

Reduce -96/8 to an exact lowest-terms form with a positive denominator.

View answer and explanation

-12/1

Divide numerator and denominator by their gcd and normalize the denominator sign; the result is -12/1.

Reviewed step-by-step derivation

Rational number · qf-rational-reduced-form · candidate

92. Reduced Rational Form

Reduce 153/12 to an exact lowest-terms form with a positive denominator.

View answer and explanation

51/4

Divide numerator and denominator by their gcd and normalize the denominator sign; the result is 51/4.

Reviewed step-by-step derivation

Rational number · qf-rational-reduced-form · candidate

93. Reduced Rational Form

Reduce -108/8 to an exact lowest-terms form with a positive denominator.

View answer and explanation

-27/2

Divide numerator and denominator by their gcd and normalize the denominator sign; the result is -27/2.

Reviewed step-by-step derivation

Rational number · qf-rational-reduced-form · candidate

94. Reduced Rational Form

Reduce 171/12 to an exact lowest-terms form with a positive denominator.

View answer and explanation

57/4

Divide numerator and denominator by their gcd and normalize the denominator sign; the result is 57/4.

Reviewed step-by-step derivation

Rational number · qf-rational-reduced-form · candidate

95. Reduced Rational Form

Reduce -120/8 to an exact lowest-terms form with a positive denominator.

View answer and explanation

-15/1

Divide numerator and denominator by their gcd and normalize the denominator sign; the result is -15/1.

Reviewed step-by-step derivation

Rational number · qf-rational-reduced-form · candidate

96. Reduced Rational Form

Reduce 189/12 to an exact lowest-terms form with a positive denominator.

View answer and explanation

63/4

Divide numerator and denominator by their gcd and normalize the denominator sign; the result is 63/4.

Reviewed step-by-step derivation

Rational number · qf-rational-reduced-form · candidate

97. Reduced Rational Form

Reduce -132/8 to an exact lowest-terms form with a positive denominator.

View answer and explanation

-33/2

Divide numerator and denominator by their gcd and normalize the denominator sign; the result is -33/2.

Reviewed step-by-step derivation

Rational number · qf-rational-reduced-form · candidate

98. Reduced Rational Form

Reduce 207/12 to an exact lowest-terms form with a positive denominator.

View answer and explanation

69/4

Divide numerator and denominator by their gcd and normalize the denominator sign; the result is 69/4.

Reviewed step-by-step derivation

Rational number · qf-rational-reduced-form · candidate

99. Reduced Rational Form

Reduce -144/8 to an exact lowest-terms form with a positive denominator.

View answer and explanation

-18/1

Divide numerator and denominator by their gcd and normalize the denominator sign; the result is -18/1.

Reviewed step-by-step derivation

Rational number · qf-rational-reduced-form · candidate

100. Reduced Rational Form

Reduce 225/12 to an exact lowest-terms form with a positive denominator.

View answer and explanation

75/4

Divide numerator and denominator by their gcd and normalize the denominator sign; the result is 75/4.

Reviewed step-by-step derivation

Rational number · qf-rational-reduced-form · candidate

Canonical question JSONL · English JSONL · Validation report