Explore related knowledge and questions →

Question 34791: Equivalent Fractions

On this page
  1. Original question and givens
  2. Definition and scope
  3. Step-by-step derivation
  4. Reverse checks
  5. Result
  6. This question review and source binding

Return to catalogue page 174

← Question derivation index · Original question batch

R0068-34791 · q-20260920-rational-equivalent-fractions-0016

Original question and givens

The denominators q=2 and s=4 are nonzero. Are 4/2 and 9/4 equivalent?

  • G001 — The denominators q=2 and s=4 are nonzero. Are 4/2 and 9/4 equivalent?

Definition and scope

Use the original question domain, assumptions and cited MKO definitions. This item has second-context mathematical and bilingual review, with the model, answer and every arithmetic step independently recomputed from the original parameters; the source question remains a candidate.

Step-by-step derivation

S001 · implies

Before

source roles = [qf-rational-equivalent-fractions, [p, q, r, s]]

After

derived = [BASE-no-required-operation, no-invented-domain]

Conditions: none

Separate source banks:legacy RAW SAFE with unbounded derived BigInts versus BASE Number.isInteger without invented SAFE/million caps.Operations,domains and permissive/exact keys follow THIS bank.Keep ORIGINAL JSON intact.

Step identifiers and dependencies

Rule: R68_BANK_specific_keys_operations_and_numeric_guards · Uses: G001

S002 · calculation

Before

Rational equivalence ORIGINAL p times s := mul(4, 4)

After

Rational equivalence ORIGINAL p times s = 16

Conditions: none

Calculate exactly from ORIGINAL ordered operands;mul/sub/div have EXPLICITLY TWO operands.Legacy derived BigInts are not recapped at RAW SAFE;check BASE Number type/representation conditions separately.Do not use floating approximations to force an answer.

Step identifiers and dependencies

Rule: exact_rational_arithmetic · Uses: G001, S001

S003 · calculation

Before

Rational equivalence ORIGINAL r times q := mul(9, 2)

After

Rational equivalence ORIGINAL r times q = 18

Conditions: none

Calculate exactly from ORIGINAL ordered operands;mul/sub/div have EXPLICITLY TWO operands.Legacy derived BigInts are not recapped at RAW SAFE;check BASE Number type/representation conditions separately.Do not use floating approximations to force an answer.

Step identifiers and dependencies

Rule: exact_rational_arithmetic · Uses: G001, S002

S004 · implies

Before

source roles = [4, 2, 9, 4]

After

derived = [16, 18, No]

Conditions: none

FIRST qualify BOTH nonzero denominators,THEN compare p*s=r*q.Negative denominators are allowed for EQUATIONS,unlike order-direction issues.Do not compare decimal appearance or accept0=0 with an undefined ratio.

Step identifiers and dependencies

Rule: Rational_EQUIVALENCE_crossmultiply_ONLY_nonzero_denominators · Uses: G001, S003

Reverse checks

  • S004 · premise_and_result_audit — Reverse-check THIS question’s ORIGINAL givens,domain and step premises.Preserve originals/English/MKOs/ASTs/status;do not reverse a one-way implication or call finite checks independent review or general formal proof.
  • S003 · premise_and_result_audit — Recompute Rational equivalence ORIGINAL r times q with exact rational arithmetic, not rounded decimals.
  • S002 · premise_and_result_audit — Recompute Rational equivalence ORIGINAL p times s with exact rational arithmetic, not rounded decimals.
  • S001 · premise_and_result_audit — Reverse-check THIS question’s ORIGINAL givens,domain and step premises.Preserve originals/English/MKOs/ASTs/status;do not reverse a one-way implication or call finite checks independent review or general formal proof.

Result

No

The full substitutions and premise checks give the original answer; source identity,format and status are unchanged.

This question review and source binding

Review date: 2026-10-26

Original questions, answers, step expressions, numeric ASTs and historical records are retained. Source candidate labels remain historical and are not overwritten as formal proof.

Source hashes and review receipts
  • input commit: 0f7be61e2c22317a4075561dc822c87d881a50db
  • original question SHA-256: aacca76ad352f9e8b9554bddc3fed177ba4e56ea484bd467786040824bcf7bb4
  • candidate record SHA-256: fdf2f506d3ff246c1b53a160ce0ebe9e26060e4b2a89e45de376f9579ff646eb
  • semantic review receipt SHA-256: e7a54104fa02c235f7591329bd6db8d626dd74bf0fae29c557b1f269c85066ed
  • question-first witness SHA-256: 8401a3c2064c1275a6a7ea8f00412fa12286cec7b2db6c305ff9dba3724ae229
  • Lean: NOT_RUN · human review: NOT_PERFORMED
Same-source full JSON