Explore related knowledge and questions →

Question 5151: Complete Inclusion Obstruction Set

On this page
  1. Original question and givens
  2. Definition and scope
  3. Step-by-step derivation
  4. Reverse checks
  5. Result
  6. This question review and source binding

Return to catalogue page 26

← Question derivation index · Original question batch

R0009-05151 · q-20261008-advance-20261011-r05-subset-0001

Original question and givens

Finite integer sets A=[] and B=[1]; repeated elements count once. List all obstructions to A⊆B, namely elements in A but not B, increasingly without repetition.

  • G001 — Finite integer sets A=[] and B=[1]; repeated elements count once. List all obstructions to A⊆B, namely elements in A but not B, increasingly without repetition.

Definition and scope

Use the original question domain, assumptions and cited MKO definitions. This item has second-context mathematical and bilingual review, with the model, answer and every arithmetic step independently recomputed from the original parameters; the source question remains a candidate.

Step-by-step derivation

S001 · implies

Before

A=[];B=[1];same integer type

After

A⊆B means every A-element belongs to B

Conditions: none

An inclusion obstruction must belong to A but not B;an element outside A is no witness,and empty A gives no obstruction.

Step identifiers and dependencies

Rule: set_inclusion_definition · Uses: G001

S002 · implies

Before

[]

After

A⊆B=Yes

Conditions: none

Because every A-element was checked,the empty obstruction set is equivalent to this finite inclusion.

Step identifiers and dependencies

Rule: complete_inclusion_obstruction_inventory · Uses: G001, S001

Reverse checks

  • S002 · premise_and_result_audit — Check against the original data and this step's premises; a one-way implication is not an equivalence.
  • S001 · premise_and_result_audit — Check against the original data and this step's premises; a one-way implication is not an equivalence.

Result

[]

The full substitutions and premise checks give the original answer; source identity,format and status are unchanged.

This question review and source binding

Review date: 2026-10-26

Original questions, answers, step expressions, numeric ASTs and historical records are retained. Source candidate labels remain historical and are not overwritten as formal proof.

Source hashes and review receipts
  • input commit: 0f7be61e2c22317a4075561dc822c87d881a50db
  • original question SHA-256: 1dd63ec7c3aa1769f74025d6952e89c34f75a9738980cdc091a92b9efe2abfe7
  • candidate record SHA-256: 9c93c34274a8277782e1d66f03fcde0f0e492405873ca7f49d5569843c5e1ed8
  • semantic review receipt SHA-256: 71e7db519df31f3a164533e472e293cb64f001b475a8d002b4a5c2740a237b56
  • question-first witness SHA-256: 5a43f4f81b6256281f8d139a4010bbde127be803c528e5878857269c8f854462
  • Lean: NOT_RUN · human review: NOT_PERFORMED
Same-source full JSON