N begins at 0; retain sequence order and repeated values. A finite prefix does not determine a unique infinite rule, convergence, or infinite series. Given ordered prefix=[7, 0, 7, 1] and candidate nexts=[19, -18]. Append each candidate separately and give (first five-term list, second five-term list, are the first four terms equal?, are the fifth terms equal?). No general rule is specified.
G001 — N begins at 0; retain sequence order and repeated values. A finite prefix does not determine a unique infinite rule, convergence, or infinite series. Given ordered prefix=[7, 0, 7, 1] and candidate nexts=[19, -18]. Append each candidate separately and give (first five-term list, second five-term list, are the first four terms equal?, are the fifth terms equal?). No general rule is specified.
Definition and scope
Use the original question domain, assumptions and cited MKO definitions. This item has second-context mathematical and bilingual review, with the model, answer and every arithmetic step independently recomputed from the original parameters; the source question remains a candidate.
N starts at0;ordered finite indices and repeated values retained
After
given recurrences differ from guessing an infinite rule from observations
Conditions: none
Sequences are ordered and may repeat.A finite observed prefix alone does not determine a unique infinite rule;when a recurrence is explicitly supplied,use that rule rather than inventing one.
Step identifiers and dependencies
Rule: finite_ordered_sequence_scope · Uses: G001
S002 · implies
Before
original prefix=[7, 0, 7, 1];candidate next=19
After
[7, 0, 7, 1, 19]
Conditions: none
The first candidate appends only its own fifth term,leaving the original prefix unchanged.
The same prefix may have different proposed next terms,so the first four do not select a unique one.If the candidates coincide,do not call them distinct extensions.
S004 · premise_and_result_audit — Check against the original data and this step's premises; a one-way implication is not an equivalence.
S003 · premise_and_result_audit — Check against the original data and this step's premises; a one-way implication is not an equivalence.
S002 · premise_and_result_audit — Check against the original data and this step's premises; a one-way implication is not an equivalence.
S001 · premise_and_result_audit — Check against the original data and this step's premises; a one-way implication is not an equivalence.
Result
([7, 0, 7, 1, 19], [7, 0, 7, 1, -18], Yes, No)
The full substitutions and premise checks give the original answer; source identity,format and status are unchanged.
This question review and source binding
Review date: 2026-10-26
Original questions, answers, step expressions, numeric ASTs and historical records are retained. Source candidate labels remain historical and are not overwritten as formal proof.