Explore related knowledge and questions →

Question 7427: Append Candidate Guard before New Table and Collisions

On this page
  1. Original question and givens
  2. Definition and scope
  3. Step-by-step derivation
  4. Reverse checks
  5. Result
  6. This question review and source binding

Return to catalogue page 38

← Question derivation index · Original question batch

R0013-07427 · q-20261012-advance-20261016-r06-injective-0052

Original question and givens

Finite types start at 0: Fin(0)=∅→Fin(1), complete images=[]. Check the whole original total table before any candidate evaluation; empty-function properties depend on the declared codomain. At the new input label n, append candidate value=0. Give (original images, new-value codomain eligibility, new images or outside-codomain, new collisions or not-evaluated, new injectivity or not-evaluated). A valid append can create nine input labels.

  • G001 — Finite types start at 0: Fin(0)=∅→Fin(1), complete images=[]. Check the whole original total table before any candidate evaluation; empty-function properties depend on the declared codomain. At the new input label n, append candidate value=0. Give (original images, new-value codomain eligibility, new images or outside-codomain, new collisions or not-evaluated, new injectivity or not-evaluated). A valid append can create nine input labels.

Definition and scope

Use the original question domain, assumptions and cited MKO definitions. This item has second-context mathematical and bilingual review, with the model, answer and every arithmetic step independently recomputed from the original parameters; the source question remains a candidate.

Step-by-step derivation

S001 · implies

Before

Fin(0)→Fin(1);original images=[]

After

injectivity forbids equal outputs from distinct original input labels

Conditions: none

Injectivity forbids equal outputs for distinct inputs;the empty function is vacuously injective,which is not surjectivity.Type-check the whole original table and retain original labels under restriction or deletion.

Step identifiers and dependencies

Rule: finite_injectivity_label_scope · Uses: G001

S002 · implies

Before

append candidate value=0;old codomain Fin(1)

After

qualified=Yes

Conditions: none

Require the new value to lie in the original codomain before constructing a table;an outside value leaves injectivity unevaluated,not False.

Step identifiers and dependencies

Rule: append_output_codomain_guard · Uses: G001, S001

S003 · implies

Before

phase=appended;all input labels=[0]

After

collisions=[];injective=Yes

Conditions: none

After all x<y pairs are checked,an empty collision list is equivalent to injectivity on this finite restriction.With0 or1 input,there are no distinct-input pairs.

Step identifiers and dependencies

Rule: complete_pairwise_collision_inventory · Uses: G001, S002

S004 · implies

Before

original n=0;new input label=0;new table=[0]

After

new domain has 1 labels;codomain m=1

Conditions: none

A legal append can extend8 original inputs to9 derived domain labels.Do not reapply the original n≤8 input-slice limit to this derived table,and do not expand the codomain.

Step identifiers and dependencies

Rule: derived_appended_domain_size · Uses: G001, S003

Reverse checks

  • S004 · premise_and_result_audit — Check against the original data and this step's premises; a one-way implication is not an equivalence.
  • S003 · premise_and_result_audit — Check against the original data and this step's premises; a one-way implication is not an equivalence.
  • S002 · premise_and_result_audit — Check against the original data and this step's premises; a one-way implication is not an equivalence.
  • S001 · premise_and_result_audit — Check against the original data and this step's premises; a one-way implication is not an equivalence.

Result

([], Yes, [0], [], Yes)

The full substitutions and premise checks give the original answer; source identity,format and status are unchanged.

This question review and source binding

Review date: 2026-10-26

Original questions, answers, step expressions, numeric ASTs and historical records are retained. Source candidate labels remain historical and are not overwritten as formal proof.

Source hashes and review receipts
  • input commit: 0f7be61e2c22317a4075561dc822c87d881a50db
  • original question SHA-256: f580beafa4a27ec3d94310215b559d4167a6bd06a0bffb1e010be0ab25afb410
  • candidate record SHA-256: 88e1859de0968fe7e14de61cd1df7fa21dc82a1cd31b8e39df014b93aca50e3f
  • semantic review receipt SHA-256: e89fc6d4a50a4a7fc942c6c8939a92f835e30105a9a5850e37dd198f31c1ed59
  • question-first witness SHA-256: 0e1039f4cf022bf35af4e5531651c9a2b7ca7a5fdacac34fb1e4bcd9a81f6299
  • Lean: NOT_RUN · human review: NOT_PERFORMED
Same-source full JSON