Explore related knowledge and questions →
← Question derivation index · Original question batch
R0015-08353 · q-20261012-advance-20261017-r03-relation-0078
The explicitly typed relation R⊆Fin(0)×Fin(2) has ordered pairs=[]. Normalize repeated pairs as a set, in lexicographic order. A relation need not be single-valued or total; its converse need not be an inverse function. Give ([n,m], normalized pairs, each source fiber size, at-most-one value per source?, exactly-one value per source?, total image table or not-a-total-function).
G001 — The explicitly typed relation R⊆Fin(0)×Fin(2) has ordered pairs=[]. Normalize repeated pairs as a set, in lexicographic order. A relation need not be single-valued or total; its converse need not be an inverse function. Give ([n,m], normalized pairs, each source fiber size, at-most-one value per source?, exactly-one value per source?, total image table or not-a-total-function).Use the original question domain, assumptions and cited MKO definitions. This item has second-context mathematical and bilingual review, with the model, answer and every arithmetic step independently recomputed from the original parameters; the source question remains a candidate.
Before
types=(0,2);raw ordered pairs=[]
After
normalized relation=[]
Conditions: none
Validate both types of every ordered pair,then deduplicate identical pairs.Swapping coordinates forms the converse,not a sorting of one pair.A relation may be multivalued or partial.
Rule: typed_relation_set_normalization · Uses: G001
Before
source fiber sizes=[]
After
single-valued=Yes;exactly-one total=Yes;table/status=[]
Conditions: none
At most one value permits missing sources;exactly one makes a total function.On an empty source both universal conditions are true and the table is empty.Repeating a pair does not increase a fiber size.
Rule: partial_single_valued_not_total · Uses: G001, S001
S002 · premise_and_result_audit — Check against the original data and this step's premises; a one-way implication is not an equivalence.S001 · premise_and_result_audit — Check against the original data and this step's premises; a one-way implication is not an equivalence.([0, 2], [], [], Yes, Yes, [])
The full substitutions and premise checks give the original answer; source identity,format and status are unchanged.
Review date: 2026-10-26
Original questions, answers, step expressions, numeric ASTs and historical records are retained. Source candidate labels remain historical and are not overwritten as formal proof.
input commit: 0f7be61e2c22317a4075561dc822c87d881a50dboriginal question SHA-256: 53881a555e1962380c9b2da1de74e3bc1a5b800d4140612a1e1192b921be8706candidate record SHA-256: a9a419318d4e06139e54bcf0c7b405fc77e8b0a2be6773b8dbd70ddb8c5cac37semantic review receipt SHA-256: 6ecad9d909199221a07e923f87425e80b3bdec3eed46fe5910d04fca694cae18question-first witness SHA-256: e8f00458977a09493b5f9f05ab9e6feec72debaf4c7d1c609d1fc95900a35a1bLean: NOT_RUN · human review: NOT_PERFORMED