Explore related knowledge and questions →

Question 2355: A Short Exact Orbit of the Specified Logistic Increment Model

On this page
  1. Original question and givens
  2. Definition and scope
  3. Step-by-step derivation
  4. Reverse checks
  5. Result
  6. This question review and source binding

Return to catalogue page 12

← Question derivation index · Original question batch

R0003-02355 · q-20261013-advance-20261021-r07-discrete-logistic-growth-0030

Original question and givens

Use exactly the fixed discrete increment model next=x+r*x*(1−x/K), with K>0, 0≤r≤1 and 0≤x≤K, at fixed time steps. Reduce exact rational outputs and omit /1 for integers. This is neither another logistic-map convention nor a continuous logistic solution; a finite orbit proves no stability, convergence or empirical population fit. initial=4/25, rate=1/1, capacity=9/1, updates=0. Give (initial,rate,capacity,update count,orbit including initial). With zero updates retain just the initial value.

  • G001 — Use exactly the fixed discrete increment model next=x+r*x*(1−x/K), with K>0, 0≤r≤1 and 0≤x≤K, at fixed time steps. Reduce exact rational outputs and omit /1 for integers. This is neither another logistic-map convention nor a continuous logistic solution; a finite orbit proves no stability, convergence or empirical population fit. initial=4/25, rate=1/1, capacity=9/1, updates=0. Give (initial,rate,capacity,update count,orbit including initial). With zero updates retain just the initial value.

Definition and scope

Use the original question domain, assumptions and cited MKO definitions. This item has second-context mathematical and bilingual review, with the model, answer and every arithmetic step independently recomputed from the original parameters; the source question remains a candidate.

Step-by-step derivation

S001 · implies

Before

0≤r=1≤1; K=9>0; 0≤x=4/25≤K

After

T(x)=x+r·x·(1−x/K)

Conditions: none

This fixed model adds the increment to the old state;it is not the different direct-product map r·x·(1−x/K).

Step identifiers and dependencies

Rule: logistic_increment_model · Uses: G001

S002 · implies

Before

initial=4/25; steps=0

After

retain the initial state before updating

Conditions: none

A zero-transition prefix still contains its initial state.

Step identifiers and dependencies

Rule: logistic_orbit_initial · Uses: G001, S001

S003 · implies

Before

orbit=[4/25]

After

entries=1=steps+1

Conditions: none

This is an exact finite orbit,not a stability proof,empirical prediction or model-fit evidence.

Step identifiers and dependencies

Rule: logistic_prefix_scope · Uses: G001, S002

Reverse checks

  • S003 · premise_and_result_audit — Check against the original data and this step's premises; a one-way implication is not an equivalence.
  • S002 · premise_and_result_audit — Check against the original data and this step's premises; a one-way implication is not an equivalence.
  • S001 · premise_and_result_audit — Check against the original data and this step's premises; a one-way implication is not an equivalence.

Result

(4/25, 1, 9, 0, [4/25])

The full substitutions and premise checks give the original answer; source identity,format and status are unchanged.

This question review and source binding

Review date: 2026-10-26

Original questions, answers, step expressions, numeric ASTs and historical records are retained. Source candidate labels remain historical and are not overwritten as formal proof.

Source hashes and review receipts
  • input commit: 0f7be61e2c22317a4075561dc822c87d881a50db
  • original question SHA-256: 38058d194898eac46e323f8c3bf1ed724954192d46ddee6afaf01bd2b8fd4db4
  • candidate record SHA-256: b82e724f44e27bbc5bc30822202b241269147b554be68ec39c339c3ae764f5a2
  • semantic review receipt SHA-256: 5dbc70ebd5f74b23384c93b63a2b1d6519e206c79f22ae16a6c2d7483cea783f
  • question-first witness SHA-256: cf121c8dd2fec13aa118b04b049ee39494f1d6d9ecdc13514cafb78c0fc021fa
  • Lean: NOT_RUN · human review: NOT_PERFORMED
Same-source full JSON