Explore related knowledge and questions →

Question 29072: A Complex Pair versus a Real-Embedding Candidate

On this page
  1. Original question and givens
  2. Definition and scope
  3. Step-by-step derivation
  4. Reverse checks
  5. Result
  6. This question review and source binding

Return to catalogue page 146

← Question derivation index · Original question batch

R0057-29072 · q-20261013-advance-20261022-r03-complex-number-0097

Original question and givens

Represent a complex number a+b*i by the ordered integer pair [a,b], with i²=−1. Keep the real component first and the imaginary coefficient second; graph appearance supplies no missing values. No complex division or polar form is used here. value=[9, 0], real candidate=10. Give (value,real candidate,is the imaginary coefficient zero?,is value exactly [candidate,0]?).

  • G001 — Represent a complex number a+b*i by the ordered integer pair [a,b], with i²=−1. Keep the real component first and the imaginary coefficient second; graph appearance supplies no missing values. No complex division or polar form is used here. value=[9, 0], real candidate=10. Give (value,real candidate,is the imaginary coefficient zero?,is value exactly [candidate,0]?).

Definition and scope

Use the original question domain, assumptions and cited MKO definitions. This item has second-context mathematical and bilingual review, with the model, answer and every arithmetic step independently recomputed from the original parameters; the source question remains a candidate.

Step-by-step derivation

S001 · implies

Before

source roles = [qf-str22-complex-real-embedding-audit, complex-real-embedding-audit]

After

derived = [[value, real_candidate, is_real_embedding, matches]]

Conditions: none

Use this bank exact ordered tuple and hyphenated operation.Rational outputs reduce with positive denominators and OMIT/1 for integers,unlike the preceding legacy bank.Do not change original bilingual snapshots or meaning.

Step identifiers and dependencies

Rule: STR22_exact_interface_and_source_ORDERED_tuple_roles · Uses: G001

S002 · implies

Before

source roles = [[9, 0], 10]

After

derived = [Yes, No]

Conditions: none

a+bi is in the real embedding IFF b=0.Matching THIS candidate also requires a=candidate.The first flag may be True while matching is False;the candidate bound is±1e6,not the pair component bound1000.

Step identifiers and dependencies

Rule: Complex_real_embedding_vs_THIS_candidate_TWO_obligations · Uses: G001, S001

Reverse checks

  • S002 · premise_and_result_audit — Reverse-check every ORIGINAL coordinate/table entry/alignment and strict premise,not just the final answer.Keep finite candidates,general reasoning,formal proof and publication responsibilities distinct.
  • S001 · premise_and_result_audit — Reverse-check every ORIGINAL coordinate/table entry/alignment and strict premise,not just the final answer.Keep finite candidates,general reasoning,formal proof and publication responsibilities distinct.

Result

([9, 0], 10, Yes, No)

The full substitutions and premise checks give the original answer; source identity,format and status are unchanged.

This question review and source binding

Review date: 2026-10-26

Original questions, answers, step expressions, numeric ASTs and historical records are retained. Source candidate labels remain historical and are not overwritten as formal proof.

Source hashes and review receipts
  • input commit: 0f7be61e2c22317a4075561dc822c87d881a50db
  • original question SHA-256: 239992a6296e454b5dd35cf7bf2b53df440d1b6616cf5dab31289c5c72441436
  • candidate record SHA-256: 7b2f1180e0ec11785b2895f245adde07b8f49dd0af10dde42c268aa293e56d01
  • semantic review receipt SHA-256: db445bb0caa8a249fcf78eadd2550b49b820e279cc80b2327f0d757d3ae920b6
  • question-first witness SHA-256: 58d12a50ea9943c50b65927607347101b1ddaf692d62e091f2cae8a9f0362eb5
  • Lean: NOT_RUN · human review: NOT_PERFORMED
Same-source full JSON