Explore related knowledge and questions →

Question 10582: An Explicit Infinite Constant Tail Supplies a Quantified Witness

On this page
  1. Original question and givens
  2. Definition and scope
  3. Step-by-step derivation
  4. Reverse checks
  5. Result
  6. This question review and source binding

Return to catalogue page 53

← Question derivation index · Original question batch

R0020-10582 · q-20261013-advance-20261023-r04-metric-convergence-0057

Original question and givens

Use the complete qualified finite metric table=[[0, 7, 15, 24], [7, 0, 8, 17], [15, 8, 0, 9], [24, 17, 9, 0]] on Fin(4)={0,…,3}. Preserve the convergence quantifiers: for every positive epsilon there exists N such that every n≥N satisfies d(x_n,candidate)<epsilon. A finite recorded tail alone does not certify this infinite statement. prefix=[2, 3]; every later term equals tail=0, candidate=1. This is an explicitly specified infinite sequence, not an inference from a finite pattern. Give (prefix,tail,candidate,prefix length,converges?,witness). For equality use for any epsilon>0 choose N=prefix length; otherwise use tail-value-differs-from-candidate.

  • G001 — Use the complete qualified finite metric table=[[0, 7, 15, 24], [7, 0, 8, 17], [15, 8, 0, 9], [24, 17, 9, 0]] on Fin(4)={0,…,3}. Preserve the convergence quantifiers: for every positive epsilon there exists N such that every n≥N satisfies d(x_n,candidate)<epsilon. A finite recorded tail alone does not certify this infinite statement. prefix=[2, 3]; every later term equals tail=0, candidate=1. This is an explicitly specified infinite sequence, not an inference from a finite pattern. Give (prefix,tail,candidate,prefix length,converges?,witness). For equality use for any epsilon>0 choose N=prefix length; otherwise use tail-value-differs-from-candidate.

Definition and scope

Use the original question domain, assumptions and cited MKO definitions. This item has second-context mathematical and bilingual review, with the model, answer and every arithmetic step independently recomputed from the original parameters; the source question remains a candidate.

Step-by-step derivation

S001 · implies

Before

carrier Fin(4);complete distance table=[[0, 7, 15, 24], [7, 0, 8, 17], [15, 8, 0, 9], [24, 17, 9, 0]]

After

nonnegative typed entries=Yes;zero iff equal=Yes;symmetric=Yes;all triangle tests=Yes

Conditions: none

Qualify the whole metric table,not only queried cells.Labels are not distances:diagonal zero,positive separation,symmetry and every triangle condition are premises for later reasoning.

Step identifiers and dependencies

Rule: whole_qualified_finite_metric · Uses: G001

S002 · implies

Before

phase=candidate;prefix=[2, 3];all later terms explicitly equal=0

After

candidate=1;infinite constant tail begins at=2

Conditions: none

The problem explicitly specifies every later term as tail;this is not guessing an infinite rule from a finite prefix.The prefix does not change the tail limit.

Step identifiers and dependencies

Rule: declared_infinite_tail_not_pattern_guess · Uses: G001, S001

S003 · calculation

Before

candidate separating epsilon := div(7, 2)

After

candidate separating epsilon = 7/2

Conditions: none

Compute exactly with this step's original roles and operands,without floating approximation or reordering source data.

Step identifiers and dependencies

Rule: exact_rational_arithmetic · Uses: G001, S002

S004 · implies

Before

phase=candidate;tail distance=7;epsilon=7/2

After

for any proposed N choose n=max(N,2);distance=7>=epsilon

Conditions: none

Metric separation gives positive distance.Choose half of it as epsilon;after every proposed N a tail term retains that distance and violates the full-tail convergence condition.

Step identifiers and dependencies

Rule: constant_tail_nonlimit_counterwitness · Uses: G001, S003

Reverse checks

  • S004 · premise_and_result_audit — Check against the original data and this step's premises; a one-way implication is not an equivalence.
  • S003 · premise_and_result_audit — Recompute candidate separating epsilon with exact rational arithmetic, not rounded decimals.
  • S002 · premise_and_result_audit — Check against the original data and this step's premises; a one-way implication is not an equivalence.
  • S001 · premise_and_result_audit — Check against the original data and this step's premises; a one-way implication is not an equivalence.

Result

([2, 3], 0, 1, 2, No, tail-value-differs-from-candidate)

The full substitutions and premise checks give the original answer; source identity,format and status are unchanged.

This question review and source binding

Review date: 2026-10-26

Original questions, answers, step expressions, numeric ASTs and historical records are retained. Source candidate labels remain historical and are not overwritten as formal proof.

Source hashes and review receipts
  • input commit: 0f7be61e2c22317a4075561dc822c87d881a50db
  • original question SHA-256: f94b8f7fdf563b92bb05079a9c0ce5230e9267629c2fd12698961795e38be3e5
  • candidate record SHA-256: 205724a16a255e2b955578f75a15ca0935e59aede684aa0d9917baf9779dbf0d
  • semantic review receipt SHA-256: b4c47938fd38085d44967226cfa8337d61334455472e7307c60d3a488cef598f
  • question-first witness SHA-256: 3c23baa97a5933bc07b44f2257017ef4e845bf1429bd6f5381410681c43b97e4
  • Lean: NOT_RUN · human review: NOT_PERFORMED
Same-source full JSON