Explore related knowledge and questions →

Question 33651: Frobenius Fixes Every Element of This Prime Field

On this page
  1. Original question and givens
  2. Definition and scope
  3. Step-by-step derivation
  4. Reverse checks
  5. Result
  6. This question review and source binding

Return to catalogue page 169

← Question derivation index · Original question batch

R0066-33651 · q-20261014-advance-20261031-r06-finite-field-0076

Original question and givens

Use the complete prime field Z_2, with prime p=2, residue labels 0 through p−1, and addition/multiplication modulo p. Nonzero inputs alone may be inverted; division by zero is never allowed. This prime-field family does not assert that every finite field has prime order or that every finite ring is a field. element=0, possibly zero. Give (element,p,power,equal?,Frobenius_on_prime_field), with power=element^p modulo p.

  • G001 — Use the complete prime field Z_2, with prime p=2, residue labels 0 through p−1, and addition/multiplication modulo p. Nonzero inputs alone may be inverted; division by zero is never allowed. This prime-field family does not assert that every finite field has prime order or that every finite ring is a field. element=0, possibly zero. Give (element,p,power,equal?,Frobenius_on_prime_field), with power=element^p modulo p.

Definition and scope

Use the original question domain, assumptions and cited MKO definitions. This item has second-context mathematical and bilingual review, with the model, answer and every arithmetic step independently recomputed from the original parameters; the source question remains a candidate.

Step-by-step derivation

S001 · implies

Before

source roles = [qf-mod31-fielddeep-frobenius, [domain, element, operation, p]]

After

derived = [fielddeep-frobenius, Exact_prime_field_Zp]

Conditions: none

THIS source uses LOCAL-hyphen operations with exact keys/domain.Keep source field order and numeric/Boolean/string roles;integer rational texts omit/1.Original questions,English,MKOs,ASTs and statuses remain unchanged.

Step identifiers and dependencies

Rule: R66_EXACT_source_bank_keys_local_operation_domain · Uses: G001

S002 · implies

Before

source roles = [2, []]

After

derived = [[], Yes]

Conditions: none

Trial EVERY divisor2 through floor(sqrt(p));a composite would have a factor there.The empty test for p=2 is valid.This qualifies THIS prime field Z_p,not every finite field’s order or every finite ring as a field.

Step identifiers and dependencies

Rule: Field_PRIME_complete_trial_divisor_qualification · Uses: G001, S001

S003 · calculation

Before

Field ORIGINAL previous power times element k=1 := mul(1, 0)

After

Field ORIGINAL previous power times element k=1 = 0

Conditions: none

Calculate exactly from THIS step’s ORIGINAL ordered operands.Retain the SOURCE rational pre-reduction envelope separately;do not use floating values or silently widen a different bank.

Step identifiers and dependencies

Rule: exact_rational_arithmetic · Uses: G001, S002

S004 · implies

Before

source roles = [power exponent1, 0, 2]

After

derived = [0, 0]

Conditions: none

Use integer Euclidean division: value=n*quotient+remainder with0≤remainder<n.Normalize negative representatives too;do not use floating remainders.

Step identifiers and dependencies

Rule: Finite_MOD_euclidean_quotient_remainder · Uses: G001, S003

S005 · calculation

Before

Field ORIGINAL previous power times element k=2 := mul(0, 0)

After

Field ORIGINAL previous power times element k=2 = 0

Conditions: none

Calculate exactly from THIS step’s ORIGINAL ordered operands.Retain the SOURCE rational pre-reduction envelope separately;do not use floating values or silently widen a different bank.

Step identifiers and dependencies

Rule: exact_rational_arithmetic · Uses: G001, S004

S006 · implies

Before

source roles = [power exponent2, 0, 2]

After

derived = [0, 0]

Conditions: none

Use integer Euclidean division: value=n*quotient+remainder with0≤remainder<n.Normalize negative representatives too;do not use floating remainders.

Step identifiers and dependencies

Rule: Finite_MOD_euclidean_quotient_remainder · Uses: G001, S005

S007 · implies

Before

source roles = [2, 0, [0, 0]]

After

derived = [0, Yes]

Conditions: none

Repeated multiplication checks element^p=element in THIS prime field,including zero.Frobenius need not fix every element of an arbitrary extension field;do not widen the conclusion.

Step identifiers and dependencies

Rule: Field_FROBENIUS_prime_field_INCLUDES_zero · Uses: G001, S006

Reverse checks

  • S007 · premise_and_result_audit — Reverse-audit THIS step against its ORIGINAL ordered roles and complete premises.Accept the conclusion only under these conditions;do not invert a one-way implication or call a finite check a general formal proof.
  • S006 · premise_and_result_audit — Reverse-audit THIS step against its ORIGINAL ordered roles and complete premises.Accept the conclusion only under these conditions;do not invert a one-way implication or call a finite check a general formal proof.
  • S005 · premise_and_result_audit — Recompute Field ORIGINAL previous power times element k=2 with exact rational arithmetic, not rounded decimals.
  • S004 · premise_and_result_audit — Reverse-audit THIS step against its ORIGINAL ordered roles and complete premises.Accept the conclusion only under these conditions;do not invert a one-way implication or call a finite check a general formal proof.
  • S003 · premise_and_result_audit — Recompute Field ORIGINAL previous power times element k=1 with exact rational arithmetic, not rounded decimals.
  • S002 · premise_and_result_audit — Reverse-audit THIS step against its ORIGINAL ordered roles and complete premises.Accept the conclusion only under these conditions;do not invert a one-way implication or call a finite check a general formal proof.
  • S001 · premise_and_result_audit — Reverse-audit THIS step against its ORIGINAL ordered roles and complete premises.Accept the conclusion only under these conditions;do not invert a one-way implication or call a finite check a general formal proof.

Result

(0, 2, 0, Yes, Frobenius_on_prime_field)

The full substitutions and premise checks give the original answer; source identity,format and status are unchanged.

This question review and source binding

Review date: 2026-10-26

Original questions, answers, step expressions, numeric ASTs and historical records are retained. Source candidate labels remain historical and are not overwritten as formal proof.

Source hashes and review receipts
  • input commit: 0f7be61e2c22317a4075561dc822c87d881a50db
  • original question SHA-256: b3a482f5046e1c7f477daf538e4cddc0418b136ad6f536698e2bb06c756ae341
  • candidate record SHA-256: a2e2819f4730fcd9045b4a5eeab8192aa67265f1aad1141946e3f56ed3921e2c
  • semantic review receipt SHA-256: 99b4f114b2ec93164b6aa5681e0107033a240e7a3f0a8988633ba65320ede267
  • question-first witness SHA-256: d9bd3a1940da8a73f790ee3fe460c9a8523791bdbe72c8e0304e3740b66710cc
  • Lean: NOT_RUN · human review: NOT_PERFORMED
Same-source full JSON