Explore related knowledge and questions →

Question 24274: The Whole Factorial Coefficient Ratio Supplies an All-Later Witness Recipe

On this page
  1. Original question and givens
  2. Definition and scope
  3. Step-by-step derivation
  4. Reverse checks
  5. Result
  6. This question review and source binding

Return to catalogue page 122

← Question derivation index · Original question batch

R0047-24274 · q-20261015-advance-20261113-r02-real-exponential-function-0049

Original question and givens

Use the whole real series E(x)=sum over n≥0 of x^n/n!, with power-series coefficients1/n!. A finite sum is a separate object; whole-series identities require the declared convergence and rearrangement obligations. Use epsilon=1/25, N=27, requiring N at least the denominator. Give (epsilon_denominator, N, epsilon, coefficient_ratio_law, ratio_bound_at_N, strict_tail_certificate, certificate).

  • G001 — Use the whole real series E(x)=sum over n≥0 of x^n/n!, with power-series coefficients1/n!. A finite sum is a separate object; whole-series identities require the declared convergence and rearrangement obligations. Use epsilon=1/25, N=27, requiring N at least the denominator. Give (epsilon_denominator, N, epsilon, coefficient_ratio_law, ratio_bound_at_N, strict_tail_certificate, certificate).

Definition and scope

Use the original question domain, assumptions and cited MKO definitions. This item has second-context mathematical and bilingual review, with the model, answer and every arithmetic step independently recomputed from the original parameters; the source question remains a candidate.

Step-by-step derivation

S001 · implies

Before

source roles = [exp-infinite-radius-certificate]

After

derived = [[epsilon_denominator, N, epsilon, coefficient_ratio_law, ratio_bound_at_N, strict_tail_certificate, certificate]]

Conditions: none

List the source field order without JavaScript.Gradient boundary uses its original mode to choose6,8 or7 fields;no padding or answer-derived mode.

Step identifiers and dependencies

Rule: source_ordered_fields_without_JS · Uses: G001

S002 · calculation

Before

Exp tail coefficient ratio bound := div(1, 28)

After

Exp tail coefficient ratio bound = 1/28

Conditions: none

Substitute original roles and established intermediates exactly;check nonzero denominators and do not round.

Step identifiers and dependencies

Rule: exact_rational_arithmetic · Uses: G001, S001

S003 · calculation

Before

Exp declared positive epsilon := div(1, 25)

After

Exp declared positive epsilon = 1/25

Conditions: none

Substitute original roles and established intermediates exactly;check nonzero denominators and do not round.

Step identifiers and dependencies

Rule: exact_rational_arithmetic · Uses: G001, S002

S004 · implies

Before

source roles = [25, 27, 1/28, 1/25]

After

derived = [EVERY n>=N:1/(n+1)<=1/(N+1)<1/d, for ANY epsilon>0 choose integer N with N+1>1/epsilon, coefficient ratio limit0,radius infinity]

Conditions: none

N>=d gives the strict bound1/(N+1)<1/d.The arbitrary-positive-epsilon recipe proves a limit,not just one epsilon.Term ratios at fixed x have an extra |x| and still tend0,so all real x give absolute convergence.

Step identifiers and dependencies

Rule: Exp_ALL_n_tail_and_arbitrary_epsilon_recipe · Uses: G001, S003

S005 · implies

Before

source roles = [[25, 27], a_n=1/n! for EVERY n>=0]

After

derived = [coefficient ratio=1/(n+1), for EVERY fixed real z,term absolute ratio=|z|/(n+1)->0, absolute convergence and real-valued E(z)]

Conditions: none

For any fixed real z,choose N+1>2|z|;later absolute term ratios are below1/2 and a geometric tail proves absolute convergence.This is not finite-prefix extrapolation or omission of |z|.

Step identifiers and dependencies

Rule: Exp_WHOLE_factorial_law_ALL_fixed_real_arguments · Uses: G001, S004

Reverse checks

  • S005 · premise_and_result_audit — Check against the original data and this step's premises; a one-way implication is not an equivalence.
  • S004 · premise_and_result_audit — Check against the original data and this step's premises; a one-way implication is not an equivalence.
  • S003 · premise_and_result_audit — Recompute Exp declared positive epsilon with exact rational arithmetic, not rounded decimals.
  • S002 · premise_and_result_audit — Recompute Exp tail coefficient ratio bound with exact rational arithmetic, not rounded decimals.
  • S001 · premise_and_result_audit — Check against the original data and this step's premises; a one-way implication is not an equivalence.

Result

(25, 27, epsilon=1/25, |a_(n+1)/a_n|=1/(n+1), 1/28, Yes, for_all_n_at_least_N_coefficient_ratio_is_less_than_epsilon_so_the_ratio_limit_is_zero_and_radius_is_infinity)

The full substitutions and premise checks give the original answer; source identity,format and status are unchanged.

This question review and source binding

Review date: 2026-10-26

Original questions, answers, step expressions, numeric ASTs and historical records are retained. Source candidate labels remain historical and are not overwritten as formal proof.

Source hashes and review receipts
  • input commit: 0f7be61e2c22317a4075561dc822c87d881a50db
  • original question SHA-256: f90e9d3615637f10c414f936a2bd725809f1f9db4e4c9ae41fe348cc25478cf0
  • candidate record SHA-256: 9a4ce6653c7253b63c484790bc11a6715fc7336d932e02d095899515bbcba12f
  • semantic review receipt SHA-256: 9b43b9823e9bd2478d6caa5b57ffed161c2c8956af86974e901d5662ad994386
  • question-first witness SHA-256: eb97596068e2d5648033bab2b8f6ca9b653bbe8cb77c0f8e1d16d0c40e46f50b
  • Lean: NOT_RUN · human review: NOT_PERFORMED
Same-source full JSON