Explore related knowledge and questions →

Question 27526: Empty Language, Epsilon, Wildcards and Bounded Equality Are Not Interchangeable

On this page
  1. Original question and givens
  2. Definition and scope
  3. Step-by-step derivation
  4. Reverse checks
  5. Result
  6. This question review and source binding

Return to catalogue page 138

← Question derivation index · Original question batch

R0054-27526 · q-20261015-advance-20261118-r06-regular-expression-0076

Original question and givens

Use mode=empty_vs_epsilon, complete model={"alphabet":[]}. Give (mode, alphabet, empty_language, epsilon_language, language_identity_claim, boundary).

  • G001 — Use mode=empty_vs_epsilon, complete model={"alphabet":[]}. Give (mode, alphabet, empty_language, epsilon_language, language_identity_claim, boundary).

Definition and scope

Use the original question domain, assumptions and cited MKO definitions. This item has second-context mathematical and bilingual review, with the model, answer and every arithmetic step independently recomputed from the original parameters; the source question remains a candidate.

Step-by-step derivation

S001 · implies

Before

source roles = [regex-boundary]

After

derived = [[mode, alphabet, empty_language, epsilon_language, language_identity_claim, boundary]]

Conditions: none

List the complete operation/mode field order without JavaScript or answer-shape inference;Boolean,string,null and an unclaimed result remain distinct.

Step identifiers and dependencies

Rule: source_ordered_fields_without_JS · Uses: G001

S002 · implies

Before

source roles = [[]]

After

derived = [[], [[]], No]

Conditions: none

As languages,[] has no words while[[]] has the single empty word;their cardinalities0 and1 differ.

Step identifiers and dependencies

Rule: Regex_EMPTY_language_NOT_singleton_EPS_language · Uses: G001, S001

Reverse checks

  • S002 · premise_and_result_audit — Reverse-check original data,operands,complete scope and premises;finite witnesses,conditional theorem use and formal proof remain distinct.
  • S001 · premise_and_result_audit — Reverse-check original data,operands,complete scope and premises;finite witnesses,conditional theorem use and formal proof remain distinct.

Result

(empty_vs_epsilon, [], [], [[]], No, empty_language_not_language_containing_empty_word)

The full substitutions and premise checks give the original answer; source identity,format and status are unchanged.

This question review and source binding

Review date: 2026-10-26

Original questions, answers, step expressions, numeric ASTs and historical records are retained. Source candidate labels remain historical and are not overwritten as formal proof.

Source hashes and review receipts
  • input commit: 0f7be61e2c22317a4075561dc822c87d881a50db
  • original question SHA-256: dd6f1ad6b0ec6a8f7d43c7dceedf952c3b5a8c16a3b54c69616683755c013a4d
  • candidate record SHA-256: b3c763bdaa5b9b1c175c7d1207f709aeb2d94ca490bfa713bfd4dcd36b8b5285
  • semantic review receipt SHA-256: 0a76d8e93c08bb16998a0483f3dfc0504f269fc3e1982e6cd868cab0a2856d54
  • question-first witness SHA-256: 09127b736c225714dfa0b7ceb0e6a6e66df27438b480cad8217d3c2f99ce9437
  • Lean: NOT_RUN · human review: NOT_PERFORMED
Same-source full JSON