Explore related knowledge and questions →

Question 27808: Oversized Steps, Stationary Maxima and Lost Feasibility Block Different Inferences

On this page
  1. Original question and givens
  2. Definition and scope
  3. Step-by-step derivation
  4. Reverse checks
  5. Result
  6. This question review and source binding

Return to catalogue page 140

← Question derivation index · Original question batch

R0054-27808 · q-20261015-pulse-20261119-r03-0083

Original question and givens

Use mode=constrained_confusion, complete model={"point":0,"gradient":8,"step_size":2,"lower":-1,"upper":1}. Give (mode, lower_bound, upper_bound, feasible_point, unconstrained_next_point, constrained_descent_claim, boundary).

  • G001 — Use mode=constrained_confusion, complete model={"point":0,"gradient":8,"step_size":2,"lower":-1,"upper":1}. Give (mode, lower_bound, upper_bound, feasible_point, unconstrained_next_point, constrained_descent_claim, boundary).

Definition and scope

Use the original question domain, assumptions and cited MKO definitions. This item has second-context mathematical and bilingual review, with the model, answer and every arithmetic step independently recomputed from the original parameters; the source question remains a candidate.

Step-by-step derivation

S001 · implies

Before

source roles = [gd-boundary]

After

derived = [[mode, lower_bound, upper_bound, feasible_point, unconstrained_next_point, constrained_descent_claim, boundary]]

Conditions: none

List the complete operation/mode field order without JavaScript or answer-shape inference;Boolean,string,null and an unclaimed result remain distinct.

Step identifiers and dependencies

Rule: source_ordered_fields_without_JS · Uses: G001

S002 · calculation

Before

GD constrained ORIGINAL alpha supplied gradient := mul(2, 8)

After

GD constrained ORIGINAL alpha supplied gradient = 16

Conditions: none

Substitute original roles and established intermediates exactly,not approximations or internally consistent changed operands;extra teaching algebra adds no source-domain gate.

Step identifiers and dependencies

Rule: exact_rational_arithmetic · Uses: G001, S001

S003 · calculation

Before

GD constrained ORIGINAL unprojected next := sub(0, 16)

After

GD constrained ORIGINAL unprojected next = -16

Conditions: none

Substitute original roles and established intermediates exactly,not approximations or internally consistent changed operands;extra teaching algebra adds no source-domain gate.

Step identifiers and dependencies

Rule: exact_rational_arithmetic · Uses: G001, S002

S004 · implies

Before

source roles = [-1, 1, 0, 8, 2]

After

derived = [-16, No]

Conditions: none

The gradient scalar is given,not verified from an unprovided objective.The original point is in the CLOSED interval but the unprojected update is strictly outside.Do not silently clamp and call it the same step or constrained descent.

Step identifiers and dependencies

Rule: GD_ACTUAL_loss_of_feasibility_NO_projection_or_unknown_objective · Uses: G001, S003

Reverse checks

  • S004 · premise_and_result_audit — Reverse-check original data,operands,complete scope and premises;finite witnesses,conditional theorem use and formal proof remain distinct.
  • S003 · premise_and_result_audit — Recompute GD constrained ORIGINAL unprojected next with exact rational arithmetic, not rounded decimals.
  • S002 · premise_and_result_audit — Recompute GD constrained ORIGINAL alpha supplied gradient with exact rational arithmetic, not rounded decimals.
  • S001 · premise_and_result_audit — Reverse-check original data,operands,complete scope and premises;finite witnesses,conditional theorem use and formal proof remain distinct.

Result

(constrained_confusion, -1, 1, 0, -16, No, unconstrained_gradient_step_is_not_projected_or_constrained_descent)

The full substitutions and premise checks give the original answer; source identity,format and status are unchanged.

This question review and source binding

Review date: 2026-10-26

Original questions, answers, step expressions, numeric ASTs and historical records are retained. Source candidate labels remain historical and are not overwritten as formal proof.

Source hashes and review receipts
  • input commit: 0f7be61e2c22317a4075561dc822c87d881a50db
  • original question SHA-256: ef178341a4e9afb2fee345209fbe35cb347c279c179af977a180158538e0b1c4
  • candidate record SHA-256: f334cfe9e47efd8153e360e87d35e343556a051cca72812358901087f75fa637
  • semantic review receipt SHA-256: 0a76d8e93c08bb16998a0483f3dfc0504f269fc3e1982e6cd868cab0a2856d54
  • question-first witness SHA-256: 09127b736c225714dfa0b7ceb0e6a6e66df27438b480cad8217d3c2f99ce9437
  • Lean: NOT_RUN · human review: NOT_PERFORMED
Same-source full JSON