第 21739 題：Möbius函數

原題與已知條件

positive integer domain與完整UPF multiplicities。操作=mobius-divisor-sum；資料={"n":14}。請依 exact_ordered_tuple_declared_by_interface 欄序回答。

• G001 — positive integer domain與完整UPF multiplicities。操作=mobius-divisor-sum；資料={"n":14}。請依 exact_ordered_tuple_declared_by_interface 欄序回答。

定義與適用範圍

沿用原題明示的論域、假設與來源 MKO 定義。本題已完成第二對話數理與中英語義覆核，並由原始參數逐題獨立重算模型、答案與每個算術步驟；原題仍為 candidate。

• mko-mobius-function

逐步推導

source operation=mobius-divisor-sum;original snapshot and mathematics retained

explicit ordered source output fields=[n, divisor_mu_rows, sum, target, equal]

ORIGINAL n=14;complete positive candidate range1..n

ALL actual positive divisors INCREASING=[1, 2, 7, 14]

mobius divisor1 of original n=14:actual positive input for mu=1

complete prime multiplicities required for this input;mu(1) uses empty product,not a partial factor search

mobius divisor1 of original n=14:input=1;COMPLETE prime multiset=[];distinct primes=[]

mu=1;empty product case=是;repeated prime=否

mobius divisor2 of original n=14:actual positive input for mu=2

complete prime multiplicities required for this input;mu(1) uses empty product,not a partial factor search

ORIGINAL positive integer absolute magnitude=2>1

initialize remaining=n,prime multiset empty;invariant product(extracted)*remaining=n;every smaller trial divisor has been exhausted

upf canonical complete product factor0 := mul(1, 2)

upf canonical complete product factor0 = 2

exhausted trial divisors below2;terminal remaining=2;d*d>remaining;ORIGINAL n=2

complete increasing prime multiset=[2];full product=2;a composite terminal remainder would have an already tested smaller divisor

mobius divisor2 of original n=14:input=2;COMPLETE prime multiset=[2];distinct primes=[2]

mu=-1;empty product case=否;repeated prime=否

mobius divisor7 of original n=14:actual positive input for mu=7

complete prime multiplicities required for this input;mu(1) uses empty product,not a partial factor search

ORIGINAL positive integer absolute magnitude=7>1

initialize remaining=n,prime multiset empty;invariant product(extracted)*remaining=n;every smaller trial divisor has been exhausted

next divisor=2;previous remaining=7;all smaller divisors exhausted

extracted multiplicity=0;next remaining=7;remaining modulo2=1;extracted multiset=[]

upf canonical complete product factor0 := mul(1, 7)

upf canonical complete product factor0 = 7

exhausted trial divisors below3;terminal remaining=7;d*d>remaining;ORIGINAL n=7

complete increasing prime multiset=[7];full product=7;a composite terminal remainder would have an already tested smaller divisor

mobius divisor7 of original n=14:input=7;COMPLETE prime multiset=[7];distinct primes=[7]

mu=-1;empty product case=否;repeated prime=否

mobius divisor14 of original n=14:actual positive input for mu=14

complete prime multiplicities required for this input;mu(1) uses empty product,not a partial factor search

ORIGINAL positive integer absolute magnitude=14>1

initialize remaining=n,prime multiset empty;invariant product(extracted)*remaining=n;every smaller trial divisor has been exhausted

upf extract divisor2 occurrence0 := div(14, 2)

upf extract divisor2 occurrence0 = 7

next divisor=2;previous remaining=14;all smaller divisors exhausted

extracted multiplicity=1;next remaining=7;remaining modulo2=1;extracted multiset=[2]

upf canonical complete product factor0 := mul(1, 2)

upf canonical complete product factor0 = 2

upf canonical complete product factor1 := mul(2, 7)

upf canonical complete product factor1 = 14

exhausted trial divisors below3;terminal remaining=7;d*d>remaining;ORIGINAL n=14

complete increasing prime multiset=[2, 7];full product=14;a composite terminal remainder would have an already tested smaller divisor

mobius divisor14 of original n=14:input=14;COMPLETE prime multiset=[2, 7];distinct primes=[2, 7]

mu=1;empty product case=否;repeated prime=否

Mobius complete divisor mu sum := sum(1, -1, -1, 1)

Mobius complete divisor mu sum = 0

ORIGINAL n=14;ALL increasing [divisor,mu] rows=[[1, 1], [2, -1], [7, -1], [14, 1]]

exact sum=0;target=0;squarefree divisors correspond to subsets of DISTINCT primes,so sum=(-1)^subset_size summed over all subsets=(1-1)^r;for n1,r0 gives1

逐步反向核對

• S025 · premise_and_result_audit — 回到原始資料與本步條件核對，不把單向推論誤稱等價。
• S024 · premise_and_result_audit — 以精確有理數重算 Mobius complete divisor mu sum，不以小數近似替代。
• S023 · premise_and_result_audit — 回到原始資料與本步條件核對，不把單向推論誤稱等價。
• S022 · premise_and_result_audit — 回到原始資料與本步條件核對，不把單向推論誤稱等價。
• S021 · premise_and_result_audit — 以精確有理數重算 upf canonical complete product factor1，不以小數近似替代。
• S020 · premise_and_result_audit — 以精確有理數重算 upf canonical complete product factor0，不以小數近似替代。
• S019 · premise_and_result_audit — 回到原始資料與本步條件核對，不把單向推論誤稱等價。
• S018 · premise_and_result_audit — 以精確有理數重算 upf extract divisor2 occurrence0，不以小數近似替代。
• S017 · premise_and_result_audit — 回到原始資料與本步條件核對，不把單向推論誤稱等價。
• S016 · premise_and_result_audit — 回到原始資料與本步條件核對，不把單向推論誤稱等價。
• S015 · premise_and_result_audit — 回到原始資料與本步條件核對，不把單向推論誤稱等價。
• S014 · premise_and_result_audit — 回到原始資料與本步條件核對，不把單向推論誤稱等價。
• S013 · premise_and_result_audit — 以精確有理數重算 upf canonical complete product factor0，不以小數近似替代。
• S012 · premise_and_result_audit — 回到原始資料與本步條件核對，不把單向推論誤稱等價。
• S011 · premise_and_result_audit — 回到原始資料與本步條件核對，不把單向推論誤稱等價。
• S010 · premise_and_result_audit — 回到原始資料與本步條件核對，不把單向推論誤稱等價。
• S009 · premise_and_result_audit — 回到原始資料與本步條件核對，不把單向推論誤稱等價。
• S008 · premise_and_result_audit — 回到原始資料與本步條件核對，不把單向推論誤稱等價。
• S007 · premise_and_result_audit — 以精確有理數重算 upf canonical complete product factor0，不以小數近似替代。
• S006 · premise_and_result_audit — 回到原始資料與本步條件核對，不把單向推論誤稱等價。
• S005 · premise_and_result_audit — 回到原始資料與本步條件核對，不把單向推論誤稱等價。
• S004 · premise_and_result_audit — 回到原始資料與本步條件核對，不把單向推論誤稱等價。
• S003 · premise_and_result_audit — 回到原始資料與本步條件核對，不把單向推論誤稱等價。
• S002 · premise_and_result_audit — 回到原始資料與本步條件核對，不把單向推論誤稱等價。
• S001 · premise_and_result_audit — 回到原始資料與本步條件核對，不把單向推論誤稱等價。

結論

(14, [[1, 1], [2, -1], [7, -1], [14, 1]], 0, 0, 是)

依上列完整代值及條件核對得到原題答案；原題編號、格式與狀態保持不變。

本題覆核與來源綁定

覆核日期：2026-10-26

原題、答案、步驟表達式、數值 AST 與既有歷史保持原樣；原來的候選狀態屬於來源歷史，不覆寫為形式化證明。